Big Wall Street banks are for Hillary Clinton

originally posted by: ChesterJohn
a reply to: SeekingAlpha

your forget one thing, Democrats had the majority of congressional seats during his term. they were more responsible for the economic downturn than he

Nope. It is all Bush and his cronies that f'ed up this country during that time. Each time Dems like Bernie Sanders tried to put legislation to regulate banks, the right wingers blocked it or Bush threatened veto over them.

Let's not forget that Bush and Paulson were the ones that gave the banks the $700 Billion bailout. At no time in the history of the US have we ever dished out free money like this that greatly added to our national deficit and was completed unfunded via our tax revenues.

Face it, it's the right wing jack asses that have spent the better part of 30 years pushing trickle down economics, massive deficit spending, and wars that have lead to our financial demise. Obama looks like a freaking saint compared to the right wing dolts that have left this country in shambles financially.

And right wingers wonder why they are having a difficult time winning major elections in this country.

a reply to: SeekingAlpha
I just love deniers your party was responsible for all economic policies passé during the Bush administration yet you deny they had any part. Typical koolaid drinker Bush never pushed any executive orders that profited anyone butt the military complex but then again so has Obama and then some

a reply to: ChesterJohn

If you worked for the government in contracting jobs under Bush big names were behind it, you made big money, under Obama policies, he did a million cut, my husband lost his job for the first time in his working life under Obama government cuts, and when he came back to work he lost 12 thousand dollars,

That is because Obama took away all the big contracting players our of the picture in favor of minorities, minorities have to work with less money, that equals lest pay, less quality of work.

originally posted by: ChesterJohn
a reply to: SeekingAlpha
I just love deniers your party was responsible for all economic policies passé during the Bush administration yet you deny they had any part. Typical koolaid drinker Bush never pushed any executive orders that profited anyone butt the military complex but then again so has Obama and then some

You can tell yourself anything you want. But when reality hits in November, We'll see how much of a demise the democrats are in when Hillary becomes president. This will mean that democrats will rule for a minimum of 12 years. I will enjoy watching the right wingers pout like spoiled children.

By the way, your take on Bush's executive orders benefiting the military is laughable. Bush spent $1.7 TRILLION on his wars. This does not include the $700 Billion he gave to the banks. Again, Obama is a saint compared to Bush's two bit presidency.

originally posted by: marg6043
a reply to: ChesterJohn

If you worked for the government in contracting jobs under Bush big names were behind it, you made big money, under Obama policies, he did a million cut, my husband lost his job for the first time in his working life under Obama government cuts, and when he came back to work he lost 12 thousand dollars,

That is because Obama took away all the big contracting players our of the picture in favor of minorities, minorities have to work with less money, that equals lest pay, less quality of work.

Your signature about global warming is an abomination to intelligence. It's like you are a lobster in water that is slowly heated to a boil and you say "there's nothing wrong with the water."