Donald or Hillary? I don't care except for this question.

In my opinion, they are both very bad candidates for President, but I am Canadian, so what do I know. Okay, I know a lot due to the internet. and my internet research says they are both not good.

But as a world citizen, where the US is running things globally, I have to wonder whether Clinton or Trump is most likely to lead the world into a nuclear war that will cause me to become a pile of ash.

My vote is Clinton. But I also believe there are other people with more power that tell presidents what to do, so I guess this question doesn't really matter.

Where is the question?

a reply to: droid56

They'll both continue to cheer lead for defense contractors and Big Bizness. They'll both continue on the path of war, air strikes, drone strikes, warmongering, regime change, and perhaps a major war.

Trump is a thin skinned pansie and Clinton is a war hawk.

a reply to: Swills

Bravo.

Couldn't have been phrased any better.

This global social chaos / Social Group Warfare (SGW) agenda that the PC Progressives are pushing for, bound with SJW + Islamic Extremists being spread across the Western world at an alarming rate, aside from the soon to go HOT Emerging Technologies threats humanity faces (that SGW is distracting everyone from), the biggest threat I see right now is this Globalist SGW agenda.

So that's a "vote" for 'Hillary For Extinction'.

Trump will rebuild relations with other countries, while using the art of the deal to convince them to uphold their part of the bargain. The bargaining chips are already in play and they have been for a long time.

originally posted by: Swills
a reply to: droid56

Trump is a thin skinned pansie and Clinton is a war hawk.

Trump also understands economic wars in today's age are much more efficient. Hillary only knows how to approve wars that have no real challenge. Hillary is scared #less of Putin, Donald isn't.

My question.... when is the IRS going to audit the Clinton Foundation??

originally posted by: droid56
In my opinion, they are both very bad candidates for President, but I am Canadian, so what do I know. Okay, I know a lot due to the internet. and my internet research says they are both not good.

Canadian here too, and I do agree with the above. There is no easy choice.

However the one thing I would use as a deciding factor between corrupt and corrupter - is the answer to this question:
Which candidate truly loves America?

Because as I see it, one clearly does, and one loves -other- countries (& their favours) much more, it would seem.

originally posted by: TheTory
Trump will rebuild relations with other countries, while using the art of the deal to convince them to uphold their part of the bargain. The bargaining chips are already in play and they have been for a long time.

Ok, given your first sentence proves true, what are those bargaining chips, and who put them in play?
OH, and what's this 'art of the deal' stuff. From what I've seen of the 'art of the deal', it mostly has to do with who has the biggest stick.

a reply to: droid56

Well I am australian so I know even less, I'm further away. Anyway, IMO, Hillary is by far the most likely to turn us all ash or to things that are only partly recongizable as human. T

This because TPTB want her hook or by crook and I suspect that its her willingness and or, pliability to put it that way, that causes TPTB to want her. I suspect that from their perspective of TPTB, Trump may suffer from the problem that he is his own man.

a reply to: droid56

I think Trump would lead us there. Though it is possoble Clinton would lead us there. Trump would cause it by simple idiocy. If Clinton caused it, it would be via being a warhawk. But we have had a lot of warhawks, entrenched in world finance. If it is a % chance, Trump would have the highest percentage of doing that.

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
This global social chaos / Social Group Warfare (SGW) agenda that the PC Progressives are pushing for, bound with SJW + Islamic Extremists being spread across the Western world at an alarming rate, aside from the soon to go HOT Emerging Technologies threats humanity faces (that SGW is distracting everyone from), the biggest threat I see right now is this Globalist SGW agenda.

So that's a "vote" for 'Hillary For Extinction'.

Now there is SGW rather than SJW. That is made up. Completely.

originally posted by: TheTory
Trump will rebuild relations with other countries, while using the art of the deal to convince them to uphold their part of the bargain. The bargaining chips are already in play and they have been for a long time.

Will he read from his book while doing this? I hope not.

originally posted by: EternalShadow
My question.... when is the IRS going to audit the Clinton Foundation??

I am sure they have been audited. Trump states he is continually being audited, so he won't release his tax returns like every other candidate did. Odd, the IRS says there is no problem for anyone under audit to release tax returns. I don;t think he has as much money as he says or is hiding something.

It has been a very long time since a candidate didn;t release their tax returns.

originally posted by: MoonBlossom

originally posted by: droid56
In my opinion, they are both very bad candidates for President, but I am Canadian, so what do I know. Okay, I know a lot due to the internet. and my internet research says they are both not good.

Canadian here too, and I do agree with the above. There is no easy choice.

However the one thing I would use as a deciding factor between corrupt and corrupter - is the answer to this question:
Which candidate truly loves America?

Because as I see it, one clearly does, and one loves -other- countries (& their favours) much more, it would seem.

Canadian here too and I endorse this message!

originally posted by: droid56
In my opinion, they are both very bad candidates for President, but I am Canadian, so what do I know. Okay, I know a lot due to the internet. and my internet research says they are both not good.

But as a world citizen, where the US is running things globally, I have to wonder whether Clinton or Trump is most likely to lead the world into a nuclear war that will cause me to become a pile of ash.

My vote is Clinton. But I also believe there are other people with more power that tell presidents what to do, so I guess this question doesn't really matter.

The U.S. is running things globally? Are you serious? Go watch another replay of the summit series.....

a reply to: droid56

I have to wonder whether Clinton or Trump is most likely to lead the world into a nuclear war that will cause me to become a pile of ash. My vote is Clinton.

I don't think a nuclear war is on the cards, but I think the more hawkish of the two is the Chucky doll.

Trump is a big, lumbering pussycat and will be cheerfully led by his advisors.

Don't be deceived or alarmed at what he says - he knows how to win the populist vote.

a reply to: TerryMcGuire
Wasnt it Teddy who said "speak softly and carry a big stick"? He did alright as President .

a reply to: Vector99

Trump doesn't understand a damn thing about leading a country.

A part of me wants him to win so when he fails and fails I can point my finger at all his ignorant supporters and say I told you so! But even then, I'm sure they would continue making excuses for him. Sad!