Nuclear Threat on America, the Hard Proof. Does ISIS have Nuclear Bombs?

This is of course a major conspiracy researcher who has in the past written very alternative information…nevertheless this may be very, very pertinent.

Why Obama and the West let a group like ISIS one day of normal power in order for this group to become established and able to potentially do something like seek Atomic material to inflict untold damage on the world, Ill never know.

According to this, admittedly alternative researchers, ISIS HAS NUCLEAR BOMBS!



www.veteranstoday.com...


I would imagine some of the experts here can comment on the technological items at the link.

originally posted by: Willtell
Why Obama and the West let a group like ISIS one day of normal power in order for this group to become established and able to potentially do something like seek Atomic material to inflict untold damage on the world, Ill never know.

ISIS started in 1999 and went through various iterations. That means that they were developing for 8 years before Obama was the POTUS.

Lots of people to blame for that but of course Obama gets blamed for everything on ATS.

Also VeteransToday isn't always the most reliable source or are prone to hyperbole.

This title is odd. Starts off with nuclear threat "Hard Proof" then asks a question that would be answered with legit "Hard Proof".....

More fear mongering.

I can't get past veteran's today.

originally posted by: opethPA

originally posted by: Willtell
Why Obama and the West let a group like ISIS one day of normal power in order for this group to become established and able to potentially do something like seek Atomic material to inflict untold damage on the world, Ill never know.

ISIS started in 1999 and went through various iterations. That means that they were developing for 8 years before Obama was the POTUS.

Lots of people to blame for that but of course Obama gets blamed for everything on ATS.

Also VeteransToday isn't always the most reliable source or are prone to hyperbole.

Of course you have lots of people to blame, Bush and Cheney are the number one culprits.

BUT… if you allow a group of madmen to get established as Obama did you ask for super trouble.


I tried to tell the people that these religious fundamentalists will blow up the earth if given a chance.

Obama pretends they aren’t crazy.

Figure that out.

You have Pakistan, a fundamentalist sympathetic country, having atomic bombs.

And Obama and the west, in order just to get Assad in Syria, help support a mad group of ISIS mass murderers who would at a drop of the hat kill millions to placate their diseased, sect and cult of religion


Also, I mentioned that the source is controversial

This is of course a major conspiracy researcher who has in the past written very alternative information…nevertheless this may be very, very pertinent.

I said the source was controversial. But the MSM isn't much better.

Let the pros figure it out...the guy says he went to the Gov with his info

a reply to: opethPA

That will change soon enough. Then everything will be blamed on Hillary.

a reply to: Sillyolme

Yeah, I imagine Trump will be blaming Hillary for a lot of the problems he'll have as commander in chief.

Joking, joking... ha ha, ha ha

check turky´s nuke depots... bet there are some missing ...
a reply to: Willtell

The main issue is that ISIS being allowed to have their caliphate could have given them some room to have a degree of stability to seek atomic weapons.


Obama’s slow, plodding method could have allowed ISIS the time to get a bomb, or chemical weapons.

The world allowing ISIS to remain so long in power is very strange.

Just doesn’t make sense

Unless they want to allow ISIS to precipitate some crazy cataclysmic event.
OR
Now here's a weird idea

KARMA?

Remember the original war on Iraq was based on a lie that Saddam had such weapons.

self-fulfilling prophecy

What if Saddam or any government other than ISIS was doing what ISIS is doing:

Killing American and NATO citizens and bragging about it

a reply to: ressiv

Where did you get that from?

Good question.

The coup was a plot by Erdogan to allow ISIS to make a move.

Maybe

a reply to: opethPA Yeah, can you name one other profession where you can 8 years of inadequate employment on the guy who had the job before you?

originally posted by: Willtell
The main issue is that ISIS being allowed to have their caliphate could have given them some room to have a degree of stability to seek atomic weapons.


Obama’s slow, plodding method could have allowed ISIS the time to get a bomb, or chemical weapons.

The world allowing ISIS to remain so long in power is very strange.

Just doesn’t make sense

Unless they want to allow ISIS to precipitate some crazy cataclysmic event.
OR
Now here's a weird idea

KARMA?

Remember the original war on Iraq was based on a lie that Saddam had such weapons.

self-fulfilling prophecy

What if Saddam or any government other than ISIS was doing what ISIS is doing:

Killing American and NATO citizens and bragging about it

What would you have had the world do? ISIS early success was a result of the Shia controlled Iraqi Government driving the Suunis and Saddams former officers into AlQuaida in Iraqs arms. What was going to stop that? When ISIS attacked the Iraqis were as surprised and upreared as everybody else. And by the time everybody began reacting they had taken half the country.

This of course was a result of the US never really letting the Iraqi take over the fighting so that as soon as the US left the Iraqis were not prepared. This time the US did it smart. They let the people who were going to be staying do the fighting , with a lot of support. Tossing US and Western troops back into the mix would have played right into ISIS hands as they would sell themselves as defending Islam from the Crusaders and that would have brought them more recruits than ever. The US would be in a never ending occupation with most of the population supporting ISIS and working against the US. Not like this would be the first time.

And nobody could have know the radicals Assad had sent into Iraq to fight the US during the early days of the uprisings would then be set free again once they had been rejailed by Assad. So they would cause troubles with the rebels. And nobody on the planet thinks sending US forces on the ground into the Syrian Civil war is a good idea.

The US fought ISIS using long term thinking not short term. Which is why ISIS is on its last legs and the US does not 500,000 troops sitting in Iraq dying from daily IED and suicide bombs.

a reply to: MrSpad

US special forces or CIA operatives aren't in Syria?...ground control to pigs

a reply to: MrSpad

US special forces or CIA operatives aren't in Syria?...ground control to pigs