It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: UKTruth
I'm not saying his kids do not adore him. That could very well be true. I just do not believe your statement was correct in that his family are a great example for America.
You are going to have to put in some overtime to try and dampen the feeling America is getting that Trump has done a great job with his children.
The "feeling America is getting"? That statement is very odd. What evidence did you use to come to a conclusion about what America as a whole are feeling?
If you said how the Right Wing feels, I may agree, but America in general?
Honestly, you are talking as if you are one of his campaign staffers.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: olaru12
For a night that was supposed to be about jobs and the economy there was very little content in that vein.
Instead we had a mock trial and cheerleading with the word job said once and that was in a sentence bashing Clinton.
Then we're treated to Ben Carson implying that Clinton is a devil worshipper.
Clinton or Hillary was mentioned five times to one over the words work job or economy.
Great focus RNC
Tonight :Make America grow again.
Will it be all about Clinton again?
Probably.
99gazillionbillionmillion votes for Hillary.
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: UKTruth
Ok. Sure.
I don't blame you for avoiding my questions. I'm sure you see how ridiculous your statement was.
"Feeling America is getting"...
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: UKTruth
Could we be honest that many of Alinsky's ideas have become mainstream at least?
We see them dozens of times each day here in hundreds of posts.
So WHAT if Hillary knew Saul Alinsky ... or perhaps, WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE?
Trump "knows" George Soros, and has benefited greatly financially from deals with him.
Does that disqualify Trump? If not, what's the logic there?
originally posted by: cavtrooper7
a reply to: Gryphon66
We hate socialist ,hippie, terrorist ,leaders maybe?
originally posted by: UKTruth
By the way, I agree that Alinsky's teachings are very apparent these days - it would seem the world he wanted is the world we are living in.
originally posted by: SonOfThor
a reply to: Gryphon66
That is a solid analysis. I am keeping my eyes and ears open to his actual speech to close out the convention. I am wondering if he will actually get into details of his platform, or continue his same style of psychological marketing.
Tonight is a big one - Cruz, Rubio, Gingrich... I haven't watched all the speeches, but have heard that some of the speakers barely mentioned Trump themselves, and rather focused on 'the party' and 'winning elections'.
I know of many republicans who are seriously leaning Johnson now, particularly in Virginia, when they went with Rubio or Rand Paul during the primary may be swayed to Trump if the rest of the candidates can provide cogent arguments to do so. Very interested in the speeches tonight.
originally posted by: cavtrooper7
a reply to: Gryphon66
AGAIN I answered your question.. WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE?
originally posted by: SonOfThor
Why not have Johnson and Jull Stein on the debate stage with these two?