It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
What is most troubling to financial market participants is that Clinton’s primary battle with Bernie Sanders has forced her to lean more heavily to the left than Wall Street finds comfortable. Perhaps the largest impact of Sanders on Clinton’s positioning has been on global trade. Clinton entered the race as a staunch supporter of free trade and has since been forced to adopt Sanders’ stance opposing the Trans-Pacific Partnership. Ironically, this is one of the few areas in which Clinton and Trump now seemingly agree.
The strong campaign run by Sanders has also forced Clinton to show support for free college tuition at state colleges and universities for those from families below top-income earners. While such a proposal is unlikely to pass muster if Republicans hang on to the House and Senate, sweeping additions to already-burdensome entitlement programs give market watchers significant heartburn.
While Clinton has taken a left-hand turn in recent weeks, the markets are hopeful that she’ll take a page from her husband’s playbook and campaign from the left and govern from the middle.
LINK
originally posted by: Profusion
Will the changes that Clinton has made in her campaign be enough to convince Sanders supporters to vote for her? In my experience, idealists (such as Sanders supporters) are rarely willing to negotiate. Half way is almost never enough for such people.
originally posted by: essentialtremors
a reply to: Profusion
There are plenty of former Sanders supporters on here alone trying to convince themselves to vote for Clinton. And the logic and reasoning that they use baffles the mind.
My gf is the same way. Her reason was because, although she can't stand the idea of a Clinton presidency, she doesn't want our state to go red again.
Ironically, all her political values align more with Johnson than Clump. By her own admission. It's just a vengeance vote in her mind, even though if enough people put their 'anti' style of politics aside and voted Johnson, our state would go neither red nor blue. And that's a way bigger middle finger IMHO.
originally posted by: essentialtremors
a reply to: Profusion
There are plenty of former Sanders supporters on here alone trying to convince themselves to vote for Clinton. And the logic and reasoning that they use baffles the mind.
My gf is the same way. Her reason was because, although she can't stand the idea of a Clinton presidency, she doesn't want our state to go red again.
Ironically, all her political values align more with Johnson than Clump. By her own admission. It's just a vengeance vote in her mind, even though if enough people put their 'anti' style of politics aside and voted Johnson, our state would go neither red nor blue. And that's a way bigger middle finger IMHO.