It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: nullafides
a reply to: one4all
Wow, are you ever incapable of seeing the forest for the trees.
I used the metaphor of "bombing" as the OP used the metaphor of "bombing" terrorists out of existence.
I said you cannot bomb an idea, because, the idea is what is motivating the terrorists to do what they do. And even if you eliminate those terrorists you won't be eliminating the idea as well. In effect, the people are actually the delivery device, not the threat.
That was the intent of my statements. Would pictures somehow work better for you?
originally posted by: JourneymanWelder
I cant believe it but this one thing he said really got me thinking, terrorists dont care about collateral damage so why should we?
Lets make their home a crater and see how many more times they try to attack the west after that.
Hell Im trying to get into the army too so I can take a few of them out my self, Im willing to die for my country if it means I can take a few of those bastards out with me. Anyone else agree?
originally posted by: madmac5150
Obama, as the head of any other nation..... would be apprehended and charged with war crimes
No trial... no jury... just end up on the man's list on a Tuesday....
originally posted by: ReprobateRaccoon
originally posted by: JourneymanWelder
I cant believe it but this one thing he said really got me thinking, terrorists dont care about collateral damage so why should we?
Lets make their home a crater and see how many more times they try to attack the west after that.
Hell Im trying to get into the army too so I can take a few of them out my self, Im willing to die for my country if it means I can take a few of those bastards out with me. Anyone else agree?
Your statement attests to your lack of understanding of the world.
1. "Terrorists" are largely a product of government manipulation and propaganda. (This is ATS. Don't you know that already?)
2. Do you really think you're going to "bomb them into stopping?" If a foreign nation bombed your country and killed your family and friends for something you weren't involved in, would you just ignore it, or would you become active in the fight to avenge the lives of those you lost?
3. Do you really think you're going to join the military, then you'll be able to go overseas and kill as many brown people as you want? Friend, what you're referring to isn't a war on terror, what you want is called genocide.
4. It's always easy to state that you're willing to die for your country in defense of freedom, but once you realize that freedom is a lie, that your "enemy" isn't the one you're actually waging war on, and that your life is the one on the line while the warmongers sit at home, getting rich, instigating more wars, your entire outlook changes.
In a nutshell, no, I don't "agree."
RR, CDR, USN (Ret)
originally posted by: ridgerunner
unless the west finds a leader like the Lionheart or Vlad the Impaler the islamists are not going to have a suitable foe and Europe will be gone in 15 years
originally posted by: Nickn3
Islamic baby killers are Muslins.
originally posted by: JourneymanWelder
originally posted by: Leonidas
a reply to: JourneymanWelder
Why should we be better than Terrorists? Really?
yes, why? they wont stop until we are all dead.
They need to know not to mess with the west or they will keep digging deeper.
Lets make their home a crater
originally posted by: nullafides
originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: JourneymanWelder
Because we should strive to be better than terrorist? And it is a war crime to do what he wants.
I love the romantic notion of chivalry in war.
But, it's a joke. And it is naive.
When someone is out to kill you....you strike as hard, and as fast, and as dirty as you can.
In survival, there is no "better than". And there is no second place, either.