Jaw-dropping photos taken above CERN’s Large Hadron Collider lead to wild new conspiracy theories

a reply to: SemperFried

Nope it's not over it.

It was directly over Geneva, which is located on the point of the lake.

There is an airport between the lake and the edge of the tunnel.

originally posted by: SemperFried
Like I said the pics show it to be West of the lake.
And here you can see how close the LHC is to the lake.

^^ That's not a good picture to show where the particles accelerator is. Here is a map that shows exactly where it is and if you compare it to the original pic you can clearly see the storm was NOT above the accelerator (just like Argyll and Chadwickus have said). You got at least 8/10km from the particles accelerator to the lake where the storm is.

originally posted by: BO XIAN
That would be good info to get.

Thanks.

I don't know.

It was not over CERN, plus the person who took the picture said very clearly on her page that it was not over the particles accelerator. So no portals, only an incredibly beautiful storm.

a reply to: Gothmog

Possibly chaos theory that states a butterfly flapping its wings on one coast could produce a cyclone on another? Just came to mind about the mosquito in flight business...

There are two lakes the storm appears to be right above a very bright spot with a curve which from the sky is typically and airport. So small lake back ground bright curve mid-ground and large lake foreground seems to place it at the end of an airport... a night shot above the city sans the storm would be a good locator, I think google earth has a night setting... my browser gets tagged as having an ad blocker even with exceptions so I can't really razz ma tazz such a thing.

tell me that vid at the end was fake pree...

Just two snapshots, no footage?

alright guys, all this actual science and observed meteorological experience and knowledge of geography aside, how can we discount such credible and thought provoking testimony as
"What portals are doors being opened in this cloud?"

a reply to: continuousThunder

"What portals are doors being opened in this cloud?"

Any your imagination can conjure up.

a reply to: continuousThunder

Short answer? Because it's not even a cogent enough sentence to understand what is actually being inquired about.

a reply to: continuousThunder

Long answer:
Because the average LHC Doomsayer in the media, and especially the tabloid rags, has no actual clue what the machine truly does, how it does it, what smashing protons together or smashing gold nuclei into lead targets actually produces, nor how any of the quantum boogeymen they love to list would actually interact with reality if created.
Honestly, the only (exceedingly remote. Really, statistical probability too close to zero to bother with) possibility of unexpected results from the LHC that ever even made my blink is the spontaneous production of strange matter (stranglets). Those little buggers would be a bad time if they ever popped into existence in our neighborhood. But even if the LHC was colliding at energies high enough to create them, it's not a concern that it actually would. While they can exist, in theory, it's more akin to the mass of a photon. We can't say for absolutely certainty that the photon has absolutely 0 mass, but all evidence indicates that it must. It would be the same for the probability of stranglets. We cannot absolutely say they cannot exist, but all evidence seems to indicate that it's a probability near 0.

So Thunderstorms are portals now?



Sorry... just wanted to be the 1000th person to post the same response. Love seeing everyone scrambling to post a debunk despite there being no-one fighting the other corner

a reply to: Agartha

^^ That's not a good picture to show where the particles accelerator is. Here is a map that shows exactly where it is and if you compare it to the original pic you can clearly see the storm was NOT above the accelerator (just like Argyll and Chadwickus have said). You got at least 8/10km grom the particles accelerator to the lake where the storm is.

And like those before you, you seem to have some sort of matter in your eyes.

It is clear from the map you posted yourself that the LHC tunnel comes as close as 2.5 km to the lake, and again in the pics the thunderstorm is West of the lake and above part of the LHC, and probably was directly over the whole thing before the pics were taken.


And why is that not a good picture, it shows exactly the same only the perspective is different. Maybe you guys can get a group discount for an eye check up.....

It was not over CERN, plus the person who took the picture said very clearly on her page that it was not over the particles accelerator

They also said it was over the lake but in the pics it is not above the lake at all but to the West of it.......

a reply to: pfishy

i feel bad now that you've gone to so much trouble spelling all that out... my post was intended to be blatantly tongue in cheek, a bit of funning around about the article's lack of research and/or copy editing.
apologies.

a reply to: Chadwickus

It was directly over Geneva, which is located on the point of the lake.

It is located around the point, so way North of it too.....

If it was over Geneva then parts of it were above the LHC too.

There is an airport between the lake and the edge of the tunnel

Yes, and?

originally posted by: SemperFried
And like those before you, you seem to have some sort of matter in your eyes.

Ah.... slander, the tool of the looser.
Go after the ball, pal, not the player......

It is clear from the map you posted yourself that the LHC tunnel comes as close as 2.5 km to the lake, and again in the pics the thunderstorm is West of the lake and above part of the LHC, and probably was directly over the whole thing before the pics were taken.

I actually think it was probably over the lake, before the pic was taken, seeing as the person who took the picture said it was 'above Geneva and its lake'.

If you look at the original picture you can see the airport, behind it we have CERN and on the other side, right by the lake, we have the storm. You have a couple of kms between the storm and CERN

And why is that not a good picture, it shows exactly the same only the perspective is different.

It's not a good picture because with that perspective you cannot calculate properly the distance between CERN and the lake.

Maybe you guys can get a group discount for an eye check up.....

LOL
What else will you say about us?

a reply to: BO XIAN

Isn't this thread a propagation of ignorance? Exactly what we come here to stop?

For there to be NEW portals, doesn't there have to be old ones?

a reply to: BO XIAN

a reply to: continuousThunder

No reason to feel bad. I knew exactly what you meant when I read your comment. That was just me being overly verbose, as usual.

a reply to: yuppa

Lightning doesn't move at the speed if light

The max speed it reaches is about 1/3rd the speed of light.

I don't see any ships floating in the cloud.

The Only Thunderstorm Ive seen that similar

was a Thunderstorm During a Erupting Volcano in Iceland
Years back ...

and what caused it ... ?? Research it ....

yeah Google it...

or see this ...

What causes volcanos to produce lightning?
earthsky.org...

So its Energy Energy... People ..

So CERN Had Caused this Thunderstom
by some kind of Energy.. Experiment ...

well if this Actually did Happen
over that certain Date ( time Frame )


Portal ??? My Butt !!

a Lot of Weird Crap been going on at CERN in the Past Few Years..