It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: mOjOm
originally posted by: Talorc
Have you seen how mammals of even the lowest order react to their offspring being killed? Hint: it really upsets them.
Sometimes sure. Other times everything from Dogs to Primates have been known to kill and sometimes eat their young. So your argument sort of falls apart when you include them too.
In other words, science says the instinct to nurture is not innate, but learned.
originally posted by: windword
a reply to: Talorc
Nope, just common sense enough to know that getting an abortion is emotionally easier to do than actually killing a baby yourself.
What are you going on about? Abortion isn't the same as murdering a baby! An acorn isn't an oak tree and a embryo isn't a baby. You sound as out of touch as the 1st century literature that informs you on woman's issues! Ironic for you though, 1st century scholars didn't consider a fetus a person either.
originally posted by: Talorc
When in doubt, just let nature take its course. Nature is right far more often than we are.
We are not omniscient and cannot judge future outcomes in the case of unborn children, therefore any decision to snuff that potential is a poor one.
Nature is right far more often than we are.
originally posted by: ladyvalkyrie
a reply to: Talorc
Their heart was broken by the decision, but it would have been MORE broken to just have it and give it away.
originally posted by: Talorc
originally posted by: ladyvalkyrie
a reply to: Talorc
Their heart was broken by the decision, but it would have been MORE broken to just have it and give it away.
a reply to: ladyvalkyrie
The best decision is to have the baby and give it away.
originally posted by: windword
a reply to: Talorc
We are autonomous and not only can, but should make these decisions on our own.
Nature is neither right nor wrong, it just is. Measles are natural, yet we vaccinate ourselves to protect us against the virus' natural effects. We change, dominate and outwit nature all the time, moving mountains and creating power by damming and redirecting rivers.
Of course we should make the decision on our own. And as with most decisions, one choice is usually better than the others.
Well, for example, bacteria are more resistant to our antibiotics than ever before. Believing that we "dominate nature" is very much proof that we don't. That's the chest beating of an ape who just pulled termites out of the ground with a stick. I'm sure he also believes he dominates nature.
originally posted by: mOjOm
a reply to: Talorc
So as a Male, just what makes you think you're opinion on this is more valid than women who actually have to deal with having a baby in the first place???
You're arguing and making decisions about something you'll never have to personally go through. That alone is enough to stop listening but the fact that you're so dismissive about what actual women have to say about this topic makes it almost impossible to take you serious.
Of course we should make the decision on our own. And as with most decisions, one choice is usually better than the others.
I don't believe my opinion is more valid, I just believe that morality and logic are superior to feelings and opinions.
originally posted by: Talorc
Why are you arguing the topic then? Shouldn't you and I both leave this thread so that only the women can discuss it?
It's almost impossible to take you seriously, you're so dismissive of the women who don't believe in abortion.
I don't believe my opinion is more valid, I just believe that morality and logic are superior to feelings and opinions.
originally posted by: Talorc
The best decision is to have the baby and give it away. Perhaps emotionally harder at first, but morally it's the right decision to make. Your emotions are transient and ultimately, women's emotions don't matter where this is concerned. Some things are more important than your feelings, which many people can't seem to realize.
So, assuming that the actual childbirth is not an issue, and assuming that the pregnancy is not an issue, these women choose to abort the child rather than have it and give away because.... they can't stomach the idea of not seeing their child and having it raised by someone else?
originally posted by: intrepid
Why are you guys arguing the SAME crap AGAIN????? This is about the SCOTUS' ruling. I find it interesting with even numbers they were still able to come to a decision. Seems about the only part of the government is actually getting something done.