It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

I Was A "Professional" 9/11 "Truther" (And I Still Am!)

page: 1
48
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:
+21 more 
posted on Jun, 20 2016 @ 04:43 PM
link   

TBH, I dont really know what it means to be a "professional" "truther".

Besides the obvious connotation of being paid to be a 9/11 "truther", I suppose it just means that someone is passionate about a cause.

Well, I dont believe the official story of 9/11.

Not saying that planes didnt hit the buildings (thats a straw man argument), just saying that there are many legitimate reasons to doubt the official version of events and the reason for the collapse of WTC 1, 2 and 7.

From the "hijackers" still being alive to the scientific dismantling of the official story, theres plenty to choose from.

If only most of us could be like this guy, he had it all figured out within minutes and even got the opportunity to tell his story to the world.


edit on 20-6-2016 by gladtobehere because: wording



posted on Jun, 20 2016 @ 04:46 PM
link   
I'm as unprofessional as they come.

I still like the truth though.

I guess this is a response to the other thread.

I couldnt be bothered to read it...the title alone was a killer.



posted on Jun, 20 2016 @ 04:47 PM
link   
all this nonsense distracts from the plausible theory, but I think that might be the idea



posted on Jun, 20 2016 @ 04:48 PM
link   
Andreas Bjorkman. Read what this man has to say and see if you can win the prize he's offering.



posted on Jun, 20 2016 @ 04:52 PM
link   
a reply to: gladtobehere

The guy in the first video is 'Harley Man' said to be an actor that day for the networks who were short on direct info for numerous reasons.
The same reason why the media 'dressed up' pictures of the seond plane coming in.
Really a side issue, but that's what they do. They should not have done that on 9/11.


edit on 20-6-2016 by smurfy because: Text.



posted on Jun, 20 2016 @ 04:53 PM
link   
Yeah, old Larry should've "pulled" the other thread before it caused any harm.


+6 more 
posted on Jun, 20 2016 @ 05:01 PM
link   
They...whomever "they" lied to us...here is a little more to consider. Great post...we need to see more on 911 to get the truth out....too bad the MSM will never pick up on it.

Here we go....remember that WTC 7 was collateral damage...Really?

You can eliminate the ‘official conspiracy theory of 911′ as being
utterly impossible. That it is also ludicrous and insulting to
intelligent people merely belabors the point.

Silverstein had Method, Motive and Opportunity

Of itself, this aspect of the story is worthy of several books. The
curtain rises upon a despondent, ugly gnomish schlemiel named
‘Lucky’ Larry Silverstein who is, interestingly, on record, video
tape to be precise, saying in fact that WTC 7, his property, was
‘pulled’. ‘Pulled’ means ‘controlled demolition’. Controlled
demolition means that the building so ‘pulled’ was prepped carefully
in advance. In advance of what? A pretext! A cover! Lucky Larry was not
just lucky. No one rolls the dice on a bet of several billion bucks.
Lucky Larry was not lucky, just crooked!

When someone like Lucky Larry buys a nearly worthless building –at any
price –you have good reason to question his motives and his plans. We
are not talking about a weekend ‘fixer upper’ to be flipped within a
week or a month. No –the World Trade center buildings were huge,
expensive, asbestos-ridden white elephants. It would have cost several
fortunes to demolish them. But Lucky Larry got an offer he could not
refuse, in fact, a Faustian bargain! Oy vay! Such a deal, already!!

Within a mere six weeks of his purchase, Larry doubles his insurance
policy. Just six weeks later, Lucky Larry sees his property destroyed in
an act of precise timing not witnessed since Moses (or was it God)
parted the Red Sea. Within six weeks, Lucky Larry sees his property, his
white elephant, his money pit, utterly destroyed. So far, Lucky Larry is
on a roll and has gotten away with it.

Silverstein’s 911 insurance payoff is estimated at some
17-billion-dollars. Let me repeat that: that’s BILLION dollars! But IF
911 had NOT occurred, Silverstein would most certainly have lost his
schlemiely ass. The May 2001 issue of Business Ins. mag reports that
critical money hemorrhaging at the white elephants of the WTC plagued by
low vacancy rates and the utter lack of modern communications. Larry’s
decision to take out a 99-year-lease on WTC makes absolutely no sense
unless he knew something that few others knew. Indeed, Lucky Larry took
over the rest of the World Trade Center on July 24th, 2001–a mere 6
weeks before 911.

The previous owner was the New York Port Authority which had carried a
grand total of 1.5 billion dollars of insurance for all of the
buildings. Lucky Larry, upside down at the the time, demanded, got, 3.5
billion worth of insurance, payable in cash if the WTC were to be
destroyed. It was destroyed and Larry was seen smiling on 911.


+1 more 
posted on Jun, 20 2016 @ 05:03 PM
link   
There are so many flaws in the official US Government’s position on 9/11
that it is sometimes difficult to know just where to start. For example,
the miraculous survival of a passport, used to identify one of the
hijackers, which somehow worked its way through the aircraft’s impact,
explosion, fire, and an 800-plus foot free-fall to be found by a
well-dressed man and given to a New York City police detective at the
base of the twin towers is a standout. The superstar-like ability of
named pilots to go from the controls of a single-engine propeller-driven
light plane to the cockpit of a passenger airliner and do anything
except put it into the ground within a minute of turning off the
autopilot is another – who would ever have thought that the Microsoft
Flight Simulator program was so superlative? And the explanations given
for the multiple failures of NORAD (the North American Air Defense
Command) to have fighters on all four planes within minutes of their
straying off course are individually dubious and collectively
preposterous – only in Hollywood would they have any credence, perhaps
because that is where they originated.



posted on Jun, 20 2016 @ 05:05 PM
link   
Can two jets take down WTC 1 & 3...and later, by magic WTC 7...no but here is how it was done.

....Independent researchers have discovered a highly engineered
explosive-incendiary material in several dust samples collected near the
WTC site. In their paper, entitled Active Thermitic Material Discovered
in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe, nine researchers,
led by chemist Niels Harrit of the University of Copenhagen,
conclude:

“[T]he red layer of the red/gray chips we have discovered in the WTC
dust is active, unreacted thermitic material, incorporating
nanotechnology, and is a highly energetic pyrotechnic or explosive
material.”
Cheers


+7 more 
posted on Jun, 20 2016 @ 05:10 PM
link   
9/11 – Thе Basic Qυеѕtіοnѕ

1. Whу didn’t jets intercept thе airliners ѕіnсе thеу hаԁ
numerous warnings οf terrorist attacks?

2. Whу ԁіԁ Ashcroft ѕtοр flying commercial airlines, citing аn
unidentified “threat” іn July 2001?

3. Whу ԁіԁ FEMA lie аbουt thеіr presence іn Nеw York οn
9/11?

4. Whу didn’t thе Secret Service hustle Dubya out οf thе
classroom?

5. Whу ԁіԁ George H.W. Bush meet bin Laden’s brother οn 9/11?

6. Whу ԁіԁ passengers οr crewmembers οn three οf thе flights
аƖƖ υѕе thе term boxcutters?

7. Whеrе аrе thе flight recorders?

8. Whу wеrе thе FISA warrants discontinued?

9. Hοw ԁіԁ Bush see thе first plane crash οn live camera?

10 Whу wаѕ security meeting scheduled fοr 9/11 cancelled bу WTC
management οn 9/10?

11. Hοw ԁіԁ thеу come up wіth thе “culprits” ѕο quickly?

12. Hοw ԁіԁ thеу find thе terrorist’s cars аt thе airports
ѕο quickly?

13. Whу ԁіԁ Shrub dissolve thе Bin Laden Task Force?

14. Whу thе ѕtrаnɡе pattern οf debris frοm Flight 93?
15. Hοw extensive wаѕ thе relationship between thе Taliban, thе
ISI аnԁ thе CIA?

16. Whаt exactly wаѕ thе role οf Henry Kissinger аt UNOCAL?

17. Whеn wаѕ іt ԁесіԁеԁ tο cancel building a pipeline frοm
Turkmenistan through Afghanistan tο Pakistan?

18. Whу ԁіԁ thе FBI іn 1996 close thе files tο investigate Osama
bin Laden’s relatives іn Washington?

19. Whу ԁіԁ .Bush ѕtοр inquiries іntο terrorist connections οf
thе Bin Laden family іn early 2001?

20. Whο mаԁе thе ԁесіѕіοn tο hаνе John O’Neill ѕtοр
investigating Al-qeada accounts?

21. Whο gave thе ԁесіѕіοn tο give hіm a security job аt thе
World Trade Center?

22. Dіԁ John O’Neill meet anyone οf thе FEMA іn thе night οf
September 10th?

23. Whаt аbουt media reports thаt hijackers bουɡht tickets fοr
flights scheduled аftеr Sept. 11?
24. Whу ԁіԁ none οf thе 19 hijackers appear οn thе passenger
lists?

25. Whу wουƖԁ devout Muslims frequent bars, drink alcoholic
beverages аnԁ leave thеіr bibles?

26. Whу wουƖԁ thе hijackers υѕе credit cards аnԁ allow
drivers licenses wіth photos tο bе zeroxed?

27. Whу ԁіԁ thе hijackers force passengers tο call relatives?

28. Hοw ԁіԁ thе hijackers change thе flight рƖаn without law
enforcement οr thе military try tο ѕtοр thеm?

29. Hοw ԁіԁ a hijackers passport miraculously appear near thе WTC?
Whο found іt аnԁ whаt time?

30. Hοw сουƖԁ thе FBI distinguish between “regular” Muslims
аnԁ hijacker Muslims οn those flights?

31. Whу wаѕ thеrе nοt one “innocent” Muslim οn board аnу
οf thеѕе flights?

32. Dіԁ someone ɡο through thе passenger lists looking fοr Muslim
names аnԁ ƖаbеƖ thеm аѕ hijackers?

I am a truth...can you all help answer these quesiions?
Cheers



posted on Jun, 20 2016 @ 05:11 PM
link   
a reply to: gladtobehere

I wonder, how does one become a professional truther? Is there a paycheck involved?



posted on Jun, 20 2016 @ 05:17 PM
link   
a reply to: JaMeDoIt

Answer 14 ? U.S. shot down flight 93



posted on Jun, 20 2016 @ 05:22 PM
link   
a reply to: gladtobehere

I have never believed it was all true. It was mainly the 'crash' at the Pentagon I looked at video of over and over again.

On the day of the attacks, I spoke on the phone to bruce beach, head of the Ark Two Shelter in Canada. There was a survival he ran that I was active on. I called him as people were still anticipating further attacks, though they were actually over. I wanted to make sure I had a spot there if I needed it.

He said to me, which was sort of baffling at the time, "They are going to close the border. I do not believe any of this is what it seems. You and your daughter have a spot, but they are going to close the border. You will not make it in time." They did close the Canadian border very shortly after. He did use the words False Flag, which I had dno't believe I had ever heard before, even being a frequent visitor to his website.

I have read much, if not most of the ATS 911 forums. There is a lot of disinfo out there. I am not sure, other than the reasons behind WT 7, that we will ever know all of the reasons and facts.
edit on 20-6-2016 by reldra because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 20 2016 @ 05:34 PM
link   
a reply to: gladtobehere

I'm more of a not-for-profit government critic.

Whether one believes the official government version that Saudi Arabian terrorists used 2 planes to knock down 3 towers in NYC - on the first try, 1 plane or missile to take out the Pentagon and another plane that crashed in a field because the west are infidels or whether one believes some other version of what transpired that day...it really is irrelevant.

At every stage in the life of a conspiracy, you have the believers and you have the skeptics and this has likely been the case since Caesar and Brutus or even before.

LOL - the 'professional' truther moniker gave me a laugh too.


edit on 20-6-2016 by Sublimecraft because:



+1 more 
posted on Jun, 20 2016 @ 05:55 PM
link   
Im the Shop Super at a steel Mill in California that makes steel products for buildings and bridges. My material is in bridges and buildings throughout the United States, Even under the Golden Gate as part of the retrofit. I have over 35 years experience in this field, and was also quality assurance Super for my corporation in the 90s. In 1990 , while on a business trip in Boston, I was asked by the president of one of Americas largest Steel mills to allow them to fly me to their mill, and do a quality presentation for all of their employees. ( I declined).

I remember that morning clearly. I had taken graveyard shift after my divorce so I could get my kids to school and back in my off hours. I was on Yahoo voice chat in a guitar playing room with several close friends from around the world. We all discussed it as we watched the towers smoking. I had to go to bed aftewr awhile but was confident that the fires would be eventually be put out, and it never even crossed my mind that they would come down. Why would it with my experience, training and knowlege? The whole jet fuel thing is stupid, and was obviously made up for people who dont know any better



posted on Jun, 20 2016 @ 06:03 PM
link   
a reply to: JaMeDoIt

33, why Barry Jennings told the truth, with independent proof on video and why media heavies like the BBC tried to make him a liar.



posted on Jun, 20 2016 @ 06:38 PM
link   
a reply to: Sublimecraft




At every stage in the life of a conspiracy, you have the believers and you have the skeptics and this has likely been the case since Caesar and Brutus or even before.

Funny how the conspiracy stories/methods have changed over 15 years.
But the OS has stayed the same.



posted on Jun, 20 2016 @ 06:41 PM
link   
I was a Truther once too, albeit only an amateur one.

Then I decided to turn my brain off so I didn't have to deal with the fact that our own government is evil as sin.

I'm much happier now.




posted on Jun, 20 2016 @ 07:57 PM
link   
a reply to: gladtobehere

Here, here. I will always be a "truther" and will take that to my grave. There are things that happened on 9/11 that that official conspiracy theory cannot and have not explained.



posted on Jun, 20 2016 @ 08:42 PM
link   
Thank you for your post! I am with you. 9/11 Truth is right.

The 9/11 lie known as the "official story" ignores many facts, while creating a highly improbable "official conspiracy story", which doesn't begin to explain the events before and after 9/11 that have come to light, and for which have not been answered.



new topics

top topics



 
48
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join