It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
“the right to purchase and sell firearms is part and parcel of the historically recognized right to keep and bear arms.”
“The right of law-abiding citizens to keep and to bear arms is not a ‘second-class right, subject to an entirely different body of rules than the other Bill of Rights guarantees that we have held to be incorporated into the Due Process Clause.’”
The 9th is usually a little Left leaning, but I guess they decided not to argue with the Supreme Court.
But notwithstanding, maybe some spheres want to hope and wait for an "incident" that goes the wrong way so somebody can set-up a lawsuit.
originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: introvert
It's a conspiracy forum.
And we all know courts and politicians never ever produce conspiracies.
It is much more logical to conclude that Leftists are not the anti-2nd boogeymen you lead people to believe.
originally posted by: projectvxn
a reply to: introvert
It is much more logical to conclude that Leftists are not the anti-2nd boogeymen you lead people to believe.
Except many leftists who are in power consistent sing the praises of confiscatory policies in other nations like Australia. By and large leftists ARE antigun.
originally posted by: LadyGreenEyes
a reply to: xuenchen
Wait....they did something right for once?
Now I am wondering why.
originally posted by: LadyGreenEyes
a reply to: xuenchen
Wait....they did something right for once?
Now I am wondering why.
originally posted by: xuenchen
Perhaps they did not want the case in question to go to the Supreme Court.
That would have made them look even more ridiculous.
They are probably expecting an onslaught of challenges next year after the California Gunpocalypse starts.