Human anatomy, ribs, have change in this reality, mandela effect

now this sh!te is getting ridiculous.

and ATS does encourage this sort of riff raff. .. while the motto is deny ignorance.

i remember when yogurt used to taste good in the late 80s... Mandela effect... ooohhh...

This reminds me of asking someone (an average person) to draw a bicycle.

This explains it:

Quick. Draw a bike. Don't look at one first, just draw one. Done? Okay, now step back and look at your bike. It's total garbage, isn't it? It's not just you. Turns out that basically no human being on the planet can accurately draw a bicycle. At least, that's what the non-scientific evidence of Italian designer Gianluca Gimini suggests.

For years, as part of his Velocipedia project, Gimini has been asking friends, acquaintances, and random strangers to draw a bike. Then he uses the drawings as blueprints for some truly comedic 3-D mockups. They hilariously emphasize just how poor our basic understanding of simple mechanics really is.

Gimini, who has collected hundreds of bike drawings, says people tend to get the same things wrong every time. They'll get the general shape of a bike right—two wheels, some handlebars, a pair of pedals, and a crossbeam—but they usually whiff on the chain and gear assembly, the part of the bike that, you know, actually makes it work. "Some people attach the chain to the front wheel, or stretch it between the front and rear wheels," he says.

Another common issue is that people tend to draw parts of the frame attached to the hub of the front wheel, making the bike they're drawing unsteerable. This is the sort of mistake that might not be obvious when making a 2-D drawing, but which people can see right away when it's turned into a 3-D model.

The Velocipedia project started in 2009, when Gimini was reminiscing to a friend about a kid he knew in school who was asked by his teacher how a bike worked. "The poor kid panicked," Gimini remembers. "He couldn't even remember if the driving wheel was the front or the rear one." Gimini's friend laughed at the story, disbelieving that anyone who had ridden bikes could be ignorant of how they work. So Gimini challenged him to draw one on a napkin. Like Gimini's old school chum, his friend spectacularly failed. "That was when I collected bike drawings."

Since then, Gimini has collected 376 bike drawings, mostly from friends but also from strangers as part of events like the Venice Biennale and Milan Design Week. He estimates that only about one out of four people can draw a bike that would actually be rideable on the first try. Although everyone is asked to draw a standard men's bicycle, Gimini observes that men and women tend to focus on different details. "Drawings by women are richer in mudguards, bells, and lights, while male subjects tend to over-complicate the frame," he says, while also noting: "I am perfectly aware that 376 drawings isn't a significant statistical sample size."

So why can't people draw bikes? Gimini says he still doesn't know. "Anyone can spot the mistakes on other people's bicycles, but when asked to draw one, subjects usually end up making the exact same errors," he says. "It's like our brains shut down in panic."

www.fastcodesign.com...

originally posted by: mousse7714
a reply to: hidingthistime

Mandela effect: (N) many idiots trying to justify stupidity.....the truth of the matter is one may be an idiot.

Indeed. It's blatantly obvious that the ME obsession is quickly becoming not about legitimate oddities, but purely a carte blanche for being a total unapologetic moron. Especially in threads such as this.

Hope you brought something marginally fire-resistant to wear, OP. You're going to need it.

originally posted by: Nyiah

originally posted by: mousse7714
a reply to: hidingthistime

Mandela effect: (N) many idiots trying to justify stupidity.....the truth of the matter is one may be an idiot.

Indeed. It's blatantly obvious that the ME obsession is quickly becoming not about legitimate oddities, but purely a carte blanche for being a total unapologetic moron. Especially in threads such as this.

Hope you brought something marginally fire-resistant to wear, OP. You're going to need it.

no, we should let this thread fade into obscurity where it belongs and maybe the mandela effect, years from today will show that this was the hottest thread on ATS.....

a reply to: hidingthistime

This is how the world used to remember before the shift in 1963




or something

Same discussion has been posted Here Exactly the same material with the whole ribs concept and all. Except this other thread has a video.

Here's the stupid video.


Seriously ATS folks are we seeing a agenda here?

This is is the best I could do with a crappy mouse in a few minutes, but a few other people, who are artistic, are drawing it on paper, as they are afraid to post in these threads, will be pming me.... afraid to post in SKUNK WORKS by the way.... so you should really stop bumping the thread if it bugs you sooooo much! You are more obsessed with it that those experiencing these changes!

a reply to: FamCore

This is why when you're giving CPR you do compressions IN THE MIDDLE OF THE CHEST

a reply to: hidingthistime

I'm pretty sure you're trolling but I have to say that was amazingly hysterical! Laughed so hard tears came out of my eyes (MANDELA EFFECT, we used to cry out of our ears).

Lol, can you imagine how screwed we would be if our ribs came out of our spine?

a reply to: [post=20704610]Domo1I am not trolling....... that is why this is so scary, it really is that different.

Before, if you wanted to stab or shoot someone in the heart, you had to get through their ribs in the upper left chest....your heart is not even protected, way down in the middle under your weird attached rib cage....

originally posted by: EmmanuelGoldstein
a reply to: hidingthistime

This is how the world used to remember before the shift in 1963

or something

We didn't have devil horns....lol

Nice try though, not bad. HHa

originally posted by: hidingthistime
This is not some joke, it is terrifying.

Not as terrifying as your absolutely remarkable ignorance of basic human anatomy and willingness to jump on the crackpot bandwagon.

a reply to: AdmireTheDistance
Please bust this thread up, Thanks.

I don't know about the other stuff, but I DO remember someone telling me when I was young that the heart is actually on the left side of the chest.

I even remember thinking that it was a shame that they say that the Heart-Center represents The Power of Love and The Spirit since the Heart was not actually at the center but to the left.

But since the Heart is in the center of the chest, it fits perfectly with that Spiritual Teaching.

Forty some years ago, the old skeletons that they had in school and in some doctors shops had the bones the same and sometimes they had organs inside of them to show the position. They were probably twenty years old at that time. So I would say sixty years ago that everything was the same.

The only thing that is different is that back then it was a hell of a lot cheaper to go into the doctors office to see the thing. One doctor in the area had one of those old skeletons with organs in it in his office. I went there two times with someone, but for the life of me I can't remember who he was. One of the specialists either my mother or uncle went to see I suppose.

originally posted by: hidingthistime
This is is the best I could do with a crappy mouse in a few minutes,

So according to your anatomy people only had 1 lung, or 2 different sized lungs!

originally posted by: EmmanuelGoldstein
a reply to: hidingthistime

This is how the world used to remember before the shift in 1963

So you could hit someone in the middle of the chest and hit their spine.... and very easily puncture a lung also!