Proof that the Bible was not written by mankind!

a reply to: Lysergic

Yet again you show 0.0000% evidence of understanding at all much of anything he is asserting.

Yet you purport to be rationally justified in judging it bogus.

LOLOLOLOL.

And you think we should treat THAT as reasonable?

LOLOLOLOL.

a reply to: BO XIAN

LOLOLOL. indeed.

Got a person arguing about fiction to me haha

Religious-Conspira-tainment.

originally posted by: chr0naut

Is mathematics man-made? Did it exist prior to humans?

In one sense, it did, the rules of the universe appear to be mathematical.

But in the other sense, mathematics as a system, is man made.

There you go again--trying to be logical & rational with folks who avoid it on these threads like the plague.

If they were logical and rational, they'd have to face THE FACTS presented. And they don't DARE do that. So they spew nonsense post in and post out.

It would be humorous if it weren't so intellectually lacking as to be embarrassing.

a reply to: Lysergic

Go ahead and treat it as fiction, if you dare.

Nevertheless,

ALL CREATION--THE ENTIRE MULTIVERSE

will ultimately bow to it and it's Author Yehovah.

a reply to: BO XIAN

I dare.

Sounds like a guy with an Ego problem.

BOW TO ME!

Mmm, no thx.

a reply to: BO XIAN

Well... This isn't Chucky's work anyways...

The whole idea of the 7s in the bible came from Ivan Panin... who admitted apparently in one of his books that he cooked the results to get the desired result.

Can't seem to find the article that went over it in detail...

but heres a different one that explains a few things

users.cecs.anu.edu.au...

a reply to: Lysergic

He was merely emphasizing the impossibility/improbability of doing such a task.

It was like Elisha pouring water on the sacrifice and in the trench around the altar on Mt Carmel. He was emphasizing the difficulty of the task.

Though, probably he'd have been delighted to have seen someone try--because--given his INFORMATION SCIENCE background, he knew it to be functionally impossible.

He's actually one of the more humble International Christian speakers I know of. That should be plenty evident from watching as few as 3 or 4 of his videos.

And, somewhat like me--he seems to enjoy poking at the absurdities on the other side. So daring the other side to sort of put up or shut up is a kind of fun thing for both of us.

a reply to: Akragon

How dare he make money off someone elses pseudo-science.

a reply to: Akragon

Will try and check it out tomorrow.

Heading to bed.

Missler has a ton of references on his org's website. He doesn't depend totally on the old codger by any means.

originally posted by: BO XIAN
a reply to: Akragon

Will try and check it out tomorrow.

Heading to bed.

Missler has a ton of references on his org's website. He doesn't depend totally on the old codger by any means.

But he does dabble in pseudo-science.

a reply to: Lysergic

I think you have it backwards.

The RELIGION OF SCIENTISM is full of pseudo-science; cooked books; corrupt relationships; cooked data etc.

Missler is a different order of character. Thankfully.

originally posted by: BO XIAN
a reply to: Lysergic

I think you have it backwards.

The RELIGION OF SCIENTISM is full of pseudo-science; cooked books; corrupt relationships; cooked data etc.

Missler is a different order of character. Thankfully.

Citation needed.

a reply to: Lysergic

NOPE.

He has far too much integrity for that.

That's more the realm of the naysayers hereon.

originally posted by: BO XIAN
a reply to: Lysergic

I think you have it backwards.

The RELIGION OF SCIENTISM is full of pseudo-science; cooked books; corrupt relationships; cooked data etc.

Missler is a different order of character. Thankfully.

I don't know about that bud...

Hes had his share of insanity in his "predictions" and theories...

originally posted by: BO XIAN
a reply to: Lysergic

NOPE.

He has far too much integrity for that.

That's more the realm of the naysayers hereon.

Citation needed to back up YOUR claims.
I am not having a discussion on forum with Chuck, it is you, if you have forgotten.

a reply to: Lysergic

There's plenty of threads about that on ATS.

Even the Main Stream Media has had plenty of stories about such.

IF you seriously want that info--you can find it.

I already know it's true. I've already read plenty of those studies and articles.

I don't have any significant need to do such research again.

Help yourself.

originally posted by: BO XIAN
a reply to: Lysergic

There's plenty of threads about that on ATS.

Even the Main Stream Media has had plenty of stories about such.

IF you seriously want that info--you can find it.

I already know it's true. I've already read plenty of those studies and articles.

I don't have any significant need to do such research again.

Help yourself.

Just because someone made a thread on ATS, does not make something true.

You can't prove your claim, it is only an opinion.

Thanks for playing, go get some rest.

a reply to: Lysergic

I don't care to obey your commands or expectations in such regards.

If you find my blather inconclusive or unattractive, so be it.

AT my age, I increasingly do what I want in my retirement.

If I want to refresh my memory with more current research, I do.

If I want to write from 55 or so years of massive information devouring--I will.

I'm not here to be anyone's research clerk.

I don't bow at the altar of command performances for citations or religion of scientism proofs.

I write from my perspective. Those who wish to dialogue with me can do so on that basis . . . or not.

a reply to: BO XIAN

It's all good, we disagree, so what.

a reply to: Lysergic

I will get some rest. I'm still grieving over the loss several hours ago of a major sculpture I spent 5 months on--it fell over and crashed and burned irretrievably. Sigh.