The Mandela Effect Can No Longer Be Denied: Berenstein Was The Tip of The Iceberg

a reply to: alienDNA

I am 100% sure milk is spelled M I L K.... I am sure you are as well.

a reply to: hidingthistime

That is something completely different. That is a trained memory. Not a recollective memory.
That is just like you knowing left is left. Its not something you recollect.
You cannot compare the two types of memories.
One is learned through repetition - one is obtained through recollection.

One is never wrong (or very seldom) - and the other can possibly ALWAYS be wrong.

originally posted by: alienDNA
a reply to: hidingthistime

That is something completely different. That is a trained memory. Not a recollective memory.
That is just like you knowing left is left. Its not something you recollect.
You cannot compare the two types of memories.
One is learned through repetition - one is obtained through recollection.

One is never wrong (or very seldom) - and the other can possibly ALWAYS be wrong.

yes, and you need to accept that a lot of these experiences ARE things we knew through repetitions, not something we heard once in grade 3....

I had said before, we were in the earthquake threads looking at google earth daily, for hours on end, then it changed in an instant! It wasn't as if I looked at Australia once in grade 4 and that was the end of it... we were watching for tsunami threats, lookig at it alllll the time.... same with things like where your heart is, if you are always drawing out human anatomy, and have drawn it repeatedly, you KNOW where the human heart is! It is not just guessing from an operation game!

a reply to: hidingthistime

No. Your repetitive memory is not the same as you recollective.
None of the memories gone over in this thread are of repetitive memories.

It doesn't work like that! If you see me walking by in a blue shirt - that is not a repetitive memory! Even if you see me walking past you SEVERAL times!
Its still recollective.

If you saw me walk by in that blue shirt for days upon days, then _possibly_ it could qualify.
But it would have to be as often as how often you've seen the word milk and the connection in your brain between that word and the actual product called milk.
And basically NONE of the recollective memories we have as humans, are like that.

For your example to be valid - you would have to stare at the SAME picture for hours upon hours - for YEARS for it to become a trained memory..

Trust me on this. For a neural pathway to become solidified and as worn-down as the neural pathway between the word MILK to the product called MILK - you would have to train it for years.

In sports a movement has to be performed at least 10k times to become true muscle memory in relation to that movement. It's the same part of the brain that handles which foot is your left foot.

Even then you need warm ups as you can't 100% pull off an athletic movement without getting your body ready, and if you let time go by without training your performance decreases.

It's the same with memory.

a reply to: alienDNA

originally posted by: hellobruce

originally posted by: Profusion
How many people were in the car when John F. Kennedy was shot?

In my former reality, the answer was four people.

Who was driving?

A Secret Service agent was driving. I remember that because of William Cooper's theory that the driver was the one who shot Kennedy (see the video below). In my previous reality, it was very unclear as to whether the driver had shot Kennedy, but it was a possibility.

Look at the video below, it's entirely different now. You can see the gun as clear as day. It's unmistakable. This is definitely entirely different than before (for me).


www.youtube.com...

originally posted by: Profusion
Who was driving?

A Secret Service agent was driving.

There goes your claim only 4 people were in the car then!

You can see the gun as clear as day. It's unmistakable.

No, you cannot see a gun, nor can you see a secret service agent shoot over his shoulder.

a reply to: hellobruce

And now we see another component of the "Mandela Effect:" people remembering what they wanted to see, rather than what they actually saw.

originally posted by: Profusion
A Secret Service agent was driving.

That should be the end of it. At a minimum that makes 5 people in the car...Don't you understand that? You also do NOT see a gun in that video.

a reply to: Profusion

I rememeber driver and secret service in front and Jackie on thebmother side and on the back of the car longer, almost fell off.

originally posted by: raymundoko

originally posted by: Profusion
A Secret Service agent was driving.

That should be the end of it. At a minimum that makes 5 people in the car...Don't you understand that? You also do NOT see a gun in that video.

dont tell people what they do and do not see or do and do not remember, you look like you are trying to manipulate the non manipulateable.... people holding fast to thier integrity dont fall for that crap and it looks like you are trying to be controlling.

We rememeber what we rememeber, and you are going to have to accept that.

originally posted by: Profusion
Look at the video below, it's entirely different now. You can see the gun as clear as day. It's unmistakable. This is definitely entirely different than before (for me).

www.youtube.com...

Here is a clearer video.

a reply to: hidingthistime

Oh, so you can screen grab where the gun is? Can that poster? Please, by all means, show me I am wrong and that he can see a gun...

the notion that special agent greer shot JFK is so utterly preposterous that it should not even merit discussion - but hey welcome to ATS - so here we are

put your self in the shoes of special agent greer on the morning of the dallas visit - this is your " breifing " :

so agent greer - while driving the presidential limosine , we want you to shoot the president - while an armed agent is sitting next to you , the govenor and his wife are sitting bettween you and the president - and there are numeous other civilians , police and secret service agents within 20m - good luck

this is why people do not take bat crap crazy people seriously

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: hellobruce

And now we see another component of the "Mandela Effect:" people remembering what they wanted to see, rather than what they actually saw.

Exactly. Ever since this thing went viral, people are LOOKING for things they remembered incorrectly and attributing it to this non-existant effect.

originally posted by: olaru12
Parallel universe's aren't linear and they aren't parallel.

We exist in a foam of 11 individual bubbles, all rubbing up against one another. Sometimes at the junction point there is bleed over from one bubble to another. The bubbles are made of a quantum matrix, continually in flux; the bleed over changes both universes permanently.



This revelation was expressed to me in a nutmeg and cough syrup trip by a citizen of the bubble next to ours, who was on vacation in Santa Fe.

This is the reason Skin-walker ranch and the San Luis valley is so weird. Some of those critters next door know how to manipulate the matrix with a device that looks like an old flip phone made by Nokia.

remember stargate....

An old Nokia flip phone???!!! That explains EVERYTHING!!! the first time I ever saw jif peanut butter I owned one of those!!!! Damn thing was supernaturally indestructible! Why did I throw it out????????? lol

originally posted by: Davg80
a reply to: TombEscaper

possible explanations of this phenomenon could well be just common grammar mistakes or lapses in memory, i have another theory, and that is that they are collective unconscious psychosis that are either part of some sort of spiritual awakening or a man-made manipulation by technology we dont know of to control the unconscious, i think that people may well be connected unconsciously there have been a few cases close to home where 10 people from the same street all men committed suicide, in my town. all within six months of each other. there was also a case of mass unrelated suicides in a place in Wales that was all over the news. Maybe i should check up on the wales thing agaain to make sure its not been wiped from the timeline lol. definetely some strange goings on in the world ..for sure

A friend of mine told me a very personal story I will not repeat here, but the relevant info is this: if 10 adult men all grew up near each other and they all committed suicide or developed unusually self-destructive drug and alcohol problems, there's a good chance someone else on that street was a child molester when they were kids.

a reply to: hidingthistime

are you seriously on that same "we know what we know" bullsh**?
haven't you learn anything?
you cannot trust your memory for crying out loud.
this is getting more and more satirical.

a reply to: Debunkology

"you can see the gun clear as day "...
wow... delusion is strong with that one.

where's the gun bruh?

when are you people gonna wake up to the fact that you need to rethink some very basic stuff about reality.

good post!

I always thought that adult diapers were called Depends but I just saw a television commercial where they are simply "Depend".

Must be an alternate reality.