Evidence that God did not create Man

a reply to: Swills

Science and Darwinism go hand in hand. I just find it very ironic he'll poop all over science but truly believes RV is real and that he now knows the origins of mankind because of it. Of the two, one is a theory and the other is probably complete BS.

Hand in hand, like two distinct entities, one of which projects its self onto the other by associating its self with it as closely as possible while remaining ever so distinct? yes, absolutely

RV on the other hand, is observable and reproducible: close your eyes and remember the last time you were in a zoo. Abra che Davra

Of course, using RV as published by untrustworthy liars murderers such as the CIA as a basis for cosmology is pretty retarded, but it does beat Darwinism

originally posted by: Agartha

originally posted by: Informer1958
Today man is still in the early stages of what is outside of our planetary system, even with the advance technologies of Satellite and advance telescopes.

How do you know for sure there are more advanced civilizations outside the solar system? We don't have any evidence for that.

I believe man was created around 150 thousand years ago, and not from evolution, and not from God.
Also it is interesting that when man suddenly appeared on earth he is intelligent and understands art, mathematics, language, music, Architecture and so much more.

If Homo Sapiens is not the product of evolution, why do we share DNA with every other creature on this planet? If we have 'alien' DNA mixed with ours, how comes nobody has spotted that? By nobody I mean doctors, nurses, scientists, lab techs etc.

Why do you believe so firmely it happened 150,000 years ago. What is your evidence?

Regarding Remote viewing, your link said:

One can legitimately ask, therefore, why the CIA, after ending "official" support in 1975 continued tasking the program for intelligence until 1995, when it then orchestrated the program's demise?

$20 millions were invested in the program and then it was closed due to lack of reliable results. If it was good I'm sure they would have increased the funding, instead of cancelling the program. And as the participants of the project have gone public with full disclosure and are still around, it doesn't seem like the government is concerned.

I have read the Princeton experiments on remote viewing and although the results show that some information seemed to be acquired beyond chance, there was a striking diminution when participants had to give more details of their viewing. (LINK)

Agartha it actually was spotted by scientists .Google alien DNA found in humans.

a reply to: PrimeAutobot

citation required

a reply to: Informer1958

Best evidence that man was not created by a supreme being? How poorly we are designed as a species if we were "Designed". Evolution can explain the faults in life, otherwise, "God" is a shoddy works-deity, and he half arsed the design. Thus he is not omnipotent.

a reply to: Informer1958
Kudos, interesting thread.

Whatever our past was, it doesn't depend on whether we can accept it not. Maybe the best that we can do is to be open to the different perspectives, possibilities and explanations.

a reply to: 5StarOracle

I have another opinion to why aliens might have created man.

Bare with me for a minute, while we take a trip down this amazing rabbit hole.

What if, God created hundreds of thousand, or even millions of planets with so many different life forms, from higher intelligent to low intelligent.

Now I am a firm believer that a soul that is born on earth, chooses to be born on earth to learn a valuable lesson and to experience their lessons good or bad by their own choices of free will.

I do not believe our souls are of man, on the contrary the soul is something much greater, more greater than we can understand.

My "opinion" is, for the soul to achieve a higher spirituality of greatness, one must be born on a planet where it is possible for the soul to experience a life lesson.

Before the soul comes to earth, their memories are temporary wiped out and the reason for this is, so the soul can achieve their lessons while on earth, if the soul memories where still intact while on earth then the soul could not learn their lesson.


Ok bare with me here, I am trying to convey a much bigger picture or let's say connect the dots here to why Aliens came to earth to create man kind.

I have no doubts there are aliens that are good, and bad with good reason. I have no doubt that God is perfect in all the creations.

My "opinion" is after God created earth which is perfect in every way and all living creatures are here for many reason are still unknown to man to this day. Our assumptions are to all things are here to maintain some kind of balance.

Now lets say, that after millions of years on earth the evolution process was much slower than what was to be expected.

The Hominoid species was of the highest intelligent on earth before the creation of man. What I believe is the earth was ripe and ready for a new species to be created, so the souls can come to earth and be born in a higher intelligence to learn millions of different life lessons to achieve a higher greatness and be able to later move on to higher dimension and to continue to incarnate on those dimensions of learning and experience good and bad decision made by each soul.

I do not believe the hominoid species was intelligent enough for the souls to come to earth to learn life lessons. Could it not be possible for a higher intelligent species that may have been instructed to travel probably billions of light years away to create a new species that is now called man. Now the souls can come to earth to learn millions of life lessons?

Could this be one of mans greatest secretes?

Sure, many will scoff at this idea, as we have already seen demonstrated in this thread about RV. Even most scientists will scoff at the idea to why we are really here.

Regardless of what people might think about multidimensional beings, intelligent life beyond Earth, and the existence of great evil on our planet, there's one aspect of all this that's crystal clear. The science skeptics are dead wrong.

Science "skeptics" are actually misnamed. They aren't skeptical at all. They simply follow their own religion with its own sacred beliefs that cannot be questioned... ever! Those beliefs include the utter worship of the materialistic view of the universe. Simultaneously, so-called "skeptics" do not believe they are conscious beings themselves because they believe consciousness is merely an "artifact" of biochemical brain function.

There is no afterlife, they insist. There is no mind-body medicine, the placebo effect is useless, and there's no such thing as premonition, remote viewing or psychic phenomena. Oh yes, and they also insist that injecting yourself with mercury, MSG and formaldehyde via vaccines is actually good for you, that fluoride chemicals are good for the public health and that we should all eat more GMOs, pesticides and synthetic chemicals.

It's no surprise these religious cult members of the "scientism" cult don't believe in an afterlife. That's what allows them to commit genocidal crimes against the human race today via GMOs, experimental medicine, toxic vaccines and other deadly pursuits. In their view, humans have no souls so killing them is of no consequence.

What is it the souls come here to learn.

Perhaps upon our death, we are judged by a higher power, and that judgment takes into account our performance in these areas. Did we achieve a measure of self-awareness? Did we work to overcome evil? Did we express love and compassion and help uplift others with knowledge and awareness?

As you've probably already figured out, the vast majority of humans fail these tests. They die as bitter, selfish, substance-addicted, greed-driven minions of evil, who mistakenly thought they were winning the game of life while, in reality, they were losing the far more important test of the Creator.

The most important part about living a human life is not acquiring money, or fame, or power over others, but rather achieving a high "score" in this simulation known as "life" by resisting evil, spreading love and expanding awareness of that which is true.

For those who respect life, who practice humility and self awareness, who seek to spread knowledge and wisdom while resisting tyranny, oppression, ignorance and evil, their souls will, I believe, be selected for special tasks in the greater multiverse. That's the "real" existence. This Earthly life is only a dream-like simulation where your soul interfaces with the crude biology of our planet for a very short time span that's actually the blink of an eye in the larger picture.

In reality, you are much more than your body. In fact, your soul is infinitely more aware, intelligent and creative than what can be experienced or expressed through the brain of a human. Trying to experience the full reality of what you are through the limited physical brain matter of a human being is a lot like trying to teach an insect to compose music like Mozart.

www.divinitynow.com...

originally posted by: wisvol
Of course, using RV as published by untrustworthy liars murderers such as the CIA as a basis for cosmology is pretty retarded, but it does beat Darwinism

LMAO! Thanks a lot, I just spit out my coffee from laughing so hard.

In what kind of a warped version of reality, does a well substantiated scientific theory based on a proven process backed by evidence lose to a complete guess? RV the basis of cosmology? On what planet?

Ya'll are killing me today, seriously.

God would love evolution as it gives him immense amount of time to shape many universes and other life forms, we are "aliens", not to each other but to every other species (even other intelligent beings) we are aliens.

Can't say how old our Homosapien species is but who's to say another intelligent beings didn't interfere with our DNA and demanded us to call them God's? or who's to say we just didn't evolve thru natural selection.

I'm going to say we were naturally selected thru evolution thus God would let us evolve as we were ment to be.