It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: tothetenthpower
This article was found on politico for me this morning and it discusses 5 different things that could be to done to combat ISIL on a more effective front. Now I'm not a military guy, I don't know if all or any of these are feasible, but there's one in particular I wanted to discuss:
5. Prepare for at-sea war crimes trials
Many ISIL fighters, once captured, are turned over to their home countries for trial or held in ramshackle prisons where chances of escape are fairly good. Instead of continuing this practice, the international community, with the U.S. taking the lead, should send captured high-value ISIL fighters to prison ships and convene immediate, no-nonsense international war crimes trials based at sea. These ships could be positioned off Diego Garcia, the British protectorate in the deepest part of the Indian Ocean. Prosecutors, defense lawyers and witnesses could conference by video. The ships could be equipped for swift on-board capital punishment. If the sentence were a prison term, the terrorist would be transported to a Western prison with adequate security and safeguards.
Full story can be found here.
So, building prisoner ships where terrorists could be tried for war crimes directly, as opposed to using Gitmo or the Hague for example.
Is this feasible? Do you think it would be a better solution that the two I mentioned above? It seems like a good idea, but again, I don't really know what the ramifications, costs or actual efficiency of such a plan would be.
They also discuss starting actual Cyber Warfare against them, which I'm really surprised that they haven't done already, you'd think that would be the #1 thing to do in order to combat the propaganda and the radicalization of non middle eastern living kids and young adults.
Thoughts?
~Tenth
originally posted by: Alien Abduct
a reply to: stonerwilliam
Then what would you do if all 300 million of them sign up?
originally posted by: paraphi
The idea is deeply flawed. No international criminal court would mandate capital punishment. The US is almost unique by being an outlier in the developed world by continuing to support capital punishment.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
I suppose we could send them to a country that does not have capital punishment and let them try and rehabilitate people who like to chuck other human beings off of buildings, burn them alive, decapitate them by sawing their head's off and generally behaving in a fashion reminiscent of Genghis Khan.
originally posted by: paraphi
Two wrongs don't make a right.
Returning jihadists should face due legal process, for sure. Where it is found they have committed atrocities they should face a long prison sentences. Some may never be released.
originally posted by: paraphi
A couple of days ago Radovan Karadzic was sentenced for war crimes and other crimes. He'll not leave prison alive.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
Face it, some people are not redeemable.
originally posted by: paraphi
True. We just differ on the punishment. I don't roll with making people martyrs. As they say in Latin (noting you seem to be proficient)...
Mea navis aëricumbens anguillis abundat.