It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: DISRAELI
a reply to: Khaleesi
And does your current choice of possible candidates include anyone who doesn't have a large election fund?
originally posted by: olaru12
originally posted by: yuppa
originally posted by: olaru12
originally posted by: ketsuko
And as angry as people are, if they pick anyone other than someone people voted for, you are looking at president Hillary or real revolution or third party.
Who will be the targets in a "real revolution"?
Third party is a good idea however!
TArgets in a real revolution? the GOP and DNC leaderships along with the bilderburgs and bankers. Nooses and gunshots for all.
I don't think making those kinds of threats is wise.
People weren't really that pissed back when hardly anyone at all could vote, so your wish will never become a reality. Voting is just one small part of participation... a trivial part really. If you take one person's life an switch their votes to the opposite of what they wanted, there will generally be zero difference at all. So, voting is over-rated. Its an opinion poll. Once you have 5,000 participants, no more are needed and are really a waste. At the national level any one person's opinion is irrelevant. Their actions, not including voting, are what matter.
originally posted by: CosmicSmack
a reply to: UnBreakable
I hope this gets people pissed. It is beyond the point were the corruption is obvious. I think we won't see any change until the camel's back breaks. We need to take the country back and fire all of these white house crooks.