Email Scandal: Hillary Clinton’s Last Defense Just Blew Up

a reply to: eluryh22

This has nothing to do with what were talking about here. Stay on topic.

a reply to: Sillyolme

Actually, the ease with which she lies through her teeth is part of the crux of the issue.

a reply to: butcherguy

Miss the part where it says the government has SINCE determined contained SENSITIVE information.
Not classified then . Classified recently.
The use of the word "insecure" in reference to the server is placed by the author since as I've already said the FBI has not said a thing. They are investigating the security of the damn server and they're not done yet.

Let's try to remember that this investigation is into the security of the server and is not and has never been a criminal investigation of Secretary Clinton.

The Washington post is neither conservative or liberal. They publish from authors with diverse leanings. I like them. Read the whole thing and you'll find articles both supporting Clinton and ones that don't.

originally posted by: eluryh22
a reply to: Sillyolme

Actually, the ease with which she lies through her teeth is part of the crux of the issue.

Lies ? what lies?

I think people are to quick to judge her integrity. This women has been under sniper fire for Gods sake and has kept her cool even when taking on the same people that have given her millions.

Imagine If Hillary hadn't taken on wall street and the insurance lobbyist where those industries would be today?

Its just coincidence that she is always in the middle of a scandal. She starts the Clinton foundation to do some good and some how millions are lost and unaccounted for, then people try to associate her to that. She is the victim here.

a reply to: eluryh22

I'm not trying to change your mind don't worry. You can hate her if that's your thing.

a reply to: eluryh22

You presume she cares of his extra-corricular activities enough for it to bother her. I think she has zero feelings on the issue.

a reply to: Sillyolme

Miss the part where it says the government has SINCE determined contained SENSITIVE information. Not classified then . Classified recently.

Sorry, but you are missing the really important part.

Who, do tell, is responsible for classifying the emails that Hillary wrote and when did they have a chance to do that?

Was it when Hillary was busy 'wiping' them off of her server?
Was it when Hillary's lawyers handed over a thumb drive containing some of her emails?

Please, when would they have had the chance to perform the classification process???

They keep saying "not classified at the time"

Well of course some weren't because the State Department never saw the ones on Hillary's private system until she herself was exposed and had no choice but to turn them over to the State Department long after she left office.

She had sole possession.

Then the SD was bound by court orders to release the emails to the public.

So of course they had to "mark them" according to guidelines.

Looks like many people are experiencing all 5 stags of denial at the same time.

originally posted by: Sillyolme

Miss the part where it says the government has SINCE determined contained SENSITIVE information.
Not classified then . Classified recently.
The use of the word "insecure" in reference to the server is placed by the author since as I've already said the FBI has not said a thing. They are investigating the security of the damn server and they're not done yet.

How can they assign a classification when they never saw them in the first place?

a reply to: eluryh22

She could walk on a stage in front of thousands of people and strangle an endangered animal while kicking an orphan in the face and never, EVER be held accountable.

You can easily say that about Trump too! Both have die hard supporters.

a reply to: WeRpeons

Trump didn't do that yet?

a reply to: Sillyolme

My arsenal is full. Why she should be president. What good things the Clinton foundation had done. Her early history in civil rights. The fact that she has more experience than any of the others.

And yet you fail to answer my question. What kind of person does supporting HC make YOU?

Or...mention any of the good things but mearly hint that there are any.

Experience, yeah. You know that people who are poor at their Federal jobs still get retirement, right?

Hacker ‘Guccifer,’ who uncovered Clinton’s private emails, to be extradited to US. www.rt.com...

Unraveling as we speak!

As far as Hillary goes, nobody can deny she is smart, knowledgeable, experienced, and that she has no doubt done some good things. But, none of that should disqualify her from being held accountable to the American people if she put this country at risk and broke our laws or even government protocols.

Even mob bosses do some good things....they support charitable causes, go to church, support their family, lavish gifts on others, etc. But, all the while, they are dealing in fraud, corruption, money-laundering, murder, extortion, etc. etc.

a reply to: 200Plus

Why yes...yes I do. Already posted some a few up.

a reply to: interupt42

Lies ? What lies?

As it pertains to this e-mail brouhaha, perhaps the easiest lie to expose is her claim that all of this personal-server stuff was for the convenience of using a single device although she used several. I would say it also lends to show how stupid she thinks the rest of us are.

a reply to: Sillyolme

What good things the Clinton foundation had done.

Haiti.

As Hillary Clinton moves toward a second run for the White House, her family’s global charitable work, mostly through the Clinton Foundation, has come under intense scrutiny. The foundation has accepted large donations from corporations and foreign countries, raising concerns that the Clintons are creating conflicts of interest by blurring the lines between their political, business and charitable interests.

The Washington Post reported last month that the foundation’s donors include seven foreign governments that contributed millions during Hillary Clinton’s tenure as secretary of state. Among those donations was a $500,000 contribution from the Algerian government for earthquake relief in Haiti that the foundation has acknowledged violated the terms of an ethics agreement with the Obama administration.

Washington Post

a reply to: NewzNose

I think HC denial is a sickness, perhaps brought on by childhood vaccinations and toothpaste.

She just may be the Donalds love child .just saying :>)

a reply to: NewzNose

Make me? Are we changing the thread to be about my character now? Are you going to slander me because I support Clinton.
No we're not doing that.

Here is the problem around the emails with Hillary Clinton:

When she was Secretary of State, there was no law or rule stating that she could not use a private server. The Secretaries of State before her had done such before. After she left office, then such was put into place.

People also tend to ignore the fact that others, like Rice and the person before her, used such and later on, their emails were retroactively made classified.

And then there is the entire debacle with Gowdy, when he was shown to have doctored documents in an attempt to derail her and prevent her from running office, if not have her thrown in jail.

This entire thing is so tiresome that it no longer matters. The Republicans bring up points, it is countered to the point where there is doubt on the minds of people about the validity of their claims. And each time they do another investigation, it comes out being a waste of time and money, that could have been used elsewhere.

Yeah, this is one dead horse that keeps on getting flogged.

Honestly, if this is the worst thing that can be found to go after Clinton on? Then really, in the grand scheme of things, it's hard to get really worked up about it.

I'd much rather people talked about the policies of the candidates, rather than this tiresome topic.