The Sad Logic of Marco Rubio Supporters On The Issue of Syria.

I like the idea of no fly zones. It is widely known Russia is not attacking ISIS but is bombing civilians to help Assad.

This is almost coming from every Marco Rubio supporter when you try to engage with them in a debate.

Haven't they forgotten the consequences of previous no fly zones? its almost pointless debating with them on the issue of Syria.

By their logic is that America and Western allies in Syria have magical bombs that doesn't bomb civilians at the same time while the Marco Rubio Supporters are claiming Russia is helping Assad we are helping Islamists.


Its not ok for Obama to be helping Islamists but it is when the GOP are in Charge?

a reply to: TaleDawn


If one bombs, one will kill civilians. No getting around it. Less so with the technology that's out there these days, but only lessening the collateral damage. Not removing it.


As far as Comparing Obama
to the GOP, and I am NOT a Rubio supporter, Obama has shown an internal agenda that apparently reduces Christian influence while expanding Islam's within the nation. Be that at some ideal of diversity or not, it adds to an overall picture that cannot be associated with the GOP.


The perception being Obama goes too far. I lean to this view of him. The similarity you raise between the two camps is countered by those differences, IMO.

Rubio is a neocon Manchurian candidate. So is Hillary, along with Jeb Bush, McCain and Lindsey Graham…. all spout those stupid ideas about Syria.

That’s because Syria is on the list of countries to destabilize that is a part of a state department/CIA black operation that comes out of the Bush W era of neocons.

a reply to: Willtell

Plans to destabilize Syria is backfiring very badly.

originally posted by: TaleDawn
a reply to: Willtell

Plans to destabilize Syria is backfiring very badly.

Think every middle east plan since the 70's has backfired badly.

a reply to: TaleDawn

The first thing you need to explain is that a "civilian" becomes a combatant the second they take up arms against their president. So no, these are not civilians they are fighting. These are well armed and well funded groups who are fighting a war to take out the government. IN effect, an army.

originally posted by: TaleDawn

I like the idea of no fly zones. It is widely known Russia is not attacking ISIS but is bombing civilians to help Assad.

This is almost coming from every Marco Rubio supporter when you try to engage with them in a debate.

Haven't they forgotten the consequences of previous no fly zones? its almost pointless debating with them on the issue of Syria.

By their logic is that America and Western allies in Syria have magical bombs that doesn't bomb civilians at the same time while the Marco Rubio Supporters are claiming Russia is helping Assad we are helping Islamists.


Its not ok for Obama to be helping Islamists but it is when the GOP are in Charge?

PCR has a very good article on his page written by one bloke and also commentary about the same issue by the some US news organization. Very interesting comparisons. No wonder most Americans have no idea of whats going on.

a reply to: Azureblue

Link to the article?

originally posted by: TaleDawn
a reply to: Azureblue

Link to the article?

PCR's web page, not that hard to find.

www.paulcraigroberts.org...