It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Bill Clinton said he would support NAFTA if elected, but would demand supplemental agreements to protect worker rights,
originally posted by: Skywatcher2011
The other problem is the cheap crap (products) that come from China that copy good quality USA products and dump them in the US market at a much lower price. That is not fair at all...so STOP importing crap from overseas at lower price...and focus on good export business. That will save jobs...and so far no current candidate running for president has the knowledge or resources in doing so (with maybe the exception of Trump)
originally posted by: Metallicus
a reply to: TrueAmerican
What do you expect them to do when they can move to Mexico and not have to deal with unions and other hassles that our Government inflicts on companies. The problem is the more you regulate and tax 'the rich' the more they will flee the country for less authoritarian governments.
originally posted by: glend
originally posted by: MystikMushroom
One part of the problem...
The company has to keep the prices on its products low enough so that Americans can afford them...
But If americans loose all their jobs they cannot afford to buy anything regardless how cheap it is. So the real issue is to earn a quick buck for stock holders without any concern for the longer term welfare of the nation.
originally posted by: kosmicjack
a reply to: MystikMushroom
That's before "corporations" and "globalism" became the primary business drivers.
A locally owned business exists within a community. There is a symbiotic relationship. If the community flourishes the business flourishes and vice versa, as you alluded to.
Now, companies are only beholden to share holders and cheap resources. The very nature of a corporation detaches responsibility or commitment from decision making, putting profits ahead of people. While globalism encourages an endless quest for cheap resources to squeeze more profit for the corporate share holders. Add to that speculation on potential profits and the costs of natural resources and it's a death spiral.
originally posted by: Leonidas
People *DEMAND* lower and lower prices for the things they buy which forces manufacturers to do everything they can to lower costs to remain competitive - but those same people *DEMAND* good paying jobs stay in their country or state.
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: TrueAmerican
Another sellout of Americans, pure and simple.
Companies don't sell out. They just follow the path of most profit, and our corporate owned government makes those paths...
originally posted by: Leonidas
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: TrueAmerican
Another sellout of Americans, pure and simple.
Companies don't sell out. They just follow the path of most profit, and our government makes those paths...
Don't give the consumer a pass for their responsibility in this.
originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: Leonidas
You have that all backwards.
People do not demand cheaper and cheaper products. They earn less and less relative to the cost of living every year, so they have no choice about what they can afford. If wages were kept pinned so that inflationary action on cost of living was always mitigated for by an automatic matching change in wages, then this nonsense would not be happening.
As it is, the majority of people have experienced a drop in earnings in real terms, and the gap between top paid, and least has grown in size to the point of insanity. Frankly, any observation which fails to take this into account, is missing the point by a margin of miles.
originally posted by: MystikMushroom
a reply to: TrueBrit
It's a cycle. As people's purchasing power goes down (inflation) they can't afford things. Companies need to make their products cheaper to keep making sales. Cheaper products means paying people less. People making less money can't afford as many things...so companies outsource manufacturing to reduce costs...
It's like a huge game of Jenga. The bricks on the bottom are being taken and placed on the very top.
Eventually the whole damn tower is going to fall over. You can't just keep squeezing the middle and lower classes and pilling all that wealth at the top. It's not a sustainable system.
originally posted by: Blue_Jay33
So this is the type of thing Trump says he is going to stop.
Is he going to rip up NAFTA, and impose a 50% tariff on all Made in Mexico goods.
How about China same thing 50% tariff.
Problem is he would need to phase that in longer than his 4 years as POTUS, as companies need time to tool up and set up and train a workforce It took time to go away and it would take time to come back and people aren't that patient.
A side effect is it could produce a grey market via Canada.
originally posted by: ArchangelUriel
The crux of the issue in my mind is do we favor people of our own nationality for employment in our businesses for mutual self benefit or because of old fashioned nationalism that has been drilled into us since a young age? Perhaps at one point in time it was mutual self benefit, now I'm not so sure.
In the modern global economy with such economic and national mobility is it really viable to hold onto these ideals? If nations barely exist why should I pay wages and taxes at a higher rate than needed to? These are the questions I'm sure many business owners have asked themselves.
originally posted by: Irishhaf
a reply to: Ksihkehe
I have no proof of this... but I believe he dropped out due to a substantial threat to his family... once he got them secure he came back... thats the only way his behavior makes sense to me.
originally posted by: PLAYERONE01
originally posted by: TrueAmerican
a reply to: DexterRiley
Yeah, you mean this one?
He was so right.
The look on Bush snr's face at the 1:40 mark says it all. he could have burnt holes through perot with lazer eyes.
originally posted by: WeRpeons
Just had to share my experience with products produced in Mexico. As a CAD instructor, I had to purchase computer chairs for my lab. I purchased a few chairs manufactured in Canada. The following year I purchased a few chairs manufactured in Mexico. After only 2 years, the chairs from Mexico started to break and fall apart. The chairs from Canada were still in good shape even after I retired from teaching 8 years later.
What it comes down to is companies that sacrifice quality for profit will never get repeat business. So in the long run, are they really benefiting from cheap labor?
originally posted by: Hr2burn
How many people here shop religiously at Wal-Mart? You're a huge part of the problem. Karma is a bitch, it will come back and bite those that support Mexican/Chinese crap.