It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: uncommitted
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: BlueJacket
a reply to: chr0naut
Mega fauna and Dinosaurs are not the same thing, at least not that I'm aware of. Mega fauna died off during the younger dryas, 12800 years ago, Dinosaurs died off 65 million years ago. The only correlation being a large astronomical event ending them both.
I would argue that smaller dinosaur descendants exist to this day (in Avains, not Reptiles).
Mega Fauna to me are all those that have excessively large body mass and would find great difficulty surviving in our current environment. This would include dinosaurs.
Alligators and crocodiles could reasonably be classed as existing dinosaurs as they developed fairly much their current form during the time period associated with dinosaurs.
originally posted by: Rasalghul
a reply to: uncommitted
If I thought everyone took it literally I wouldn't ask the question. Of course it isn't historically accurate (the bible). Lot's of the tales in Genesis are of greater Mesopotamian origin (Sumer, Babylon, Canaan, Akkadia all had similar tales) and we just have a retelling of them in the bible.
They are not Jewish tales, just Israelite versions of older tales. But if you don't take it literally, I find that odd, you literally believe some, but not all, of the bible. Do you have a process for determining allegory from the literal? If some parts are just mythology, well, then it's not truth. I would have a difficult time with that, as "the word of god" is taken literally by many christians. Scientific discoveries that don't jive with Genesis has forced many to alter biblical interpretation to suit developments in human knowledge.
I can't believe that Enoch is not canonical, it answers the question better than science or re interpretation ever could. It's THE answer.
Are christians afraid of a book that makes it make sense? Enoch is the best book out of all scripture. IMO.
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: uncommitted
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: BlueJacket
a reply to: chr0naut
Mega fauna and Dinosaurs are not the same thing, at least not that I'm aware of. Mega fauna died off during the younger dryas, 12800 years ago, Dinosaurs died off 65 million years ago. The only correlation being a large astronomical event ending them both.
I would argue that smaller dinosaur descendants exist to this day (in Avains, not Reptiles).
Mega Fauna to me are all those that have excessively large body mass and would find great difficulty surviving in our current environment. This would include dinosaurs.
Alligators and crocodiles could reasonably be classed as existing dinosaurs as they developed fairly much their current form during the time period associated with dinosaurs.
Most dinosaurs were reptiles, but alligatoridae, crocodylidae and gavialidae are descended from a different branch of the phylolgenetic tree.
originally posted by: Rasalghul
a reply to: uncommitted
I remember as a kid someone found a living dodo bird in the 80's I think. Do you, or anyone else remember that?
originally posted by: uncommitted
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: uncommitted
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: BlueJacket
a reply to: chr0naut
Mega fauna and Dinosaurs are not the same thing, at least not that I'm aware of. Mega fauna died off during the younger dryas, 12800 years ago, Dinosaurs died off 65 million years ago. The only correlation being a large astronomical event ending them both.
I would argue that smaller dinosaur descendants exist to this day (in Avains, not Reptiles).
Mega Fauna to me are all those that have excessively large body mass and would find great difficulty surviving in our current environment. This would include dinosaurs.
Alligators and crocodiles could reasonably be classed as existing dinosaurs as they developed fairly much their current form during the time period associated with dinosaurs.
Most dinosaurs were reptiles, but alligatoridae, crocodylidae and gavialidae are descended from a different branch of the phylolgenetic tree.
That's a fair point, but you would then still agree they are examples of what we could consider dinosaurs walking or swimming amongst us.
originally posted by: Rasalghul
a reply to: uncommitted
I literally saw the bird on tv. It was without a doubt a dodo bird, from what I had learned about dodo's. And it was definitely called by everyone a dodo bird, and then I never heard about it again. So there are more somewhere, this one was just found, it must have strayed from where they are hiding, and probably have evolved instinctively to hide to prevent there extinction.
. I have no question that I saw it on the local news as a kid. I don't remember things that didn't happen and loved dinosaurs so much I was fully aware of what a dodo bird was so I didn't get the bird wrong either.
originally posted by: Prezbo369
a reply to: StallionDuck
No, it's beliefs like this that makes you a whack job....
Many people would rather see the likes of me dead and murdered simply because I wouldn't believe in evolution, or a 13billion year time table and so forth
originally posted by: Rasalghul
a reply to: Prezbo369
I definitely missed that, my mistake. What he said is crazy you were right. Sorry.
originally posted by: Rasalghul
a reply to: Raggedyman
I personally think evolution is a areaming pile of ..it. But I am not a christian.
originally posted by: StallionDuck
It's responses like this that turn a decent thread into a flaming all out fight.
You would be ignorant if you believe that people didn't feel that Christians are a waste of breath. I personally knew people growing up (who were even friends of mine) that believed that all Christians and Jews should be killed. Yeah, they were racist too. Why we remained friends while knowing I believed in God? I listed to heavy metal so I guess that made some kind of difference. Did they act upon it? No... they just believed it.
Christians are killed in other parts of the world simply because they are Christian and not muslim.
How can you deny that?
There are atheist who purposely dog Christians every day just because they're Christian. Sure.. there are Christians that do the same thing but I'm not denying that. You're simply denying the other side of it. To say that it's only one sided is completely ignorant.
So tell me... all knowing one... What constitutes me as a whack job, again?
Many people would rather see the likes of me dead and murdered simply because I wouldn't believe in evolution