It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Moreover, in a bombshell statement, Cox also said she feels the reason they were ambushed by authorities was because they had “many documents” in their possession which show the illegalities of area land grabs, such as the Hammond case, conducted by federal agencies.
originally posted by: Boadicea
a reply to: TheBadCabbie
I just read this at another website:
Moreover, in a bombshell statement, Cox also said she feels the reason they were ambushed by authorities was because they had “many documents” in their possession which show the illegalities of area land grabs, such as the Hammond case, conducted by federal agencies.
Do you happen to remember which interview Cox said this in? I remember Bundy claiming they had found evidence and documents proving federal malfeasance, but I don't recall Cox saying it in the two interviews I listened to, and I only have so much data until it re-ups at the end of the month so I don't want to use it up listening to them all again.
If this is true, then this would explain the need to separate the vehicles, and the ambush and shooting of Finicum and the vehicle. Dead men (and women) tell no tales...
I also hope that if it's true, that they got something out to somewhere... even just cell phone pics they sent to someone...
If the Obama Justice Department and FBI are truly interested in “transparency” and laying out “an honest and unfiltered view of what happened and how it happened,” they will release Shawna Cox’s video, as well as all other police/FBI video and audio recordings of the shooting.
If an officer intentionally or recklessly violates a suspect's constitutional rights, then the violation may be a provocation creating a situation in which force was necessary and such force would have been legal but for the initial violation.