It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Xcathdra
I was wondering if Ceres might have been a moon of the planet that used to be where the asteroid belt is now.
I disagree with that summation, because other possibilities are just as possible.
originally posted by: wildespace
originally posted by: Xcathdra
I was wondering if Ceres might have been a moon of the planet that used to be where the asteroid belt is now.
If you could clump all the asteroids in the belt (including Ceres) into one single body, it would be smaller than the Moon. So, no, it doesn't look like there used to be a planet there. Rather, those asteroids are probably the "bits and pieces" left over from the formation of the Solar System, and formed into a belt through gravitational influence from Mars and Jupiter.
originally posted by: Xcathdra
I was wondering if Ceres might have been a moon of the planet that used to be where the asteroid belt is now.
Either way cool video. Thanks for sharing.
originally posted by: All Seeing Eye
I disagree with that summation, because other possibilities are just as possible.
originally posted by: wildespace
originally posted by: Xcathdra
I was wondering if Ceres might have been a moon of the planet that used to be where the asteroid belt is now.
If you could clump all the asteroids in the belt (including Ceres) into one single body, it would be smaller than the Moon. So, no, it doesn't look like there used to be a planet there. Rather, those asteroids are probably the "bits and pieces" left over from the formation of the Solar System, and formed into a belt through gravitational influence from Mars and Jupiter.
What if there was a planet there that fell apart for one reason or another, but all the bits and pieces did not stay in the planetary orbit, but were flung out in space, and pelted the other planets in the form of "asteroid rain". That would account for many of the meteor hits on the moon, mars and the other planets. Besides, I doubt very seriously any estimate of the size of the planet that could have been there, could even be close to the truth.
originally posted by: Vector99
originally posted by: Xcathdra
I was wondering if Ceres might have been a moon of the planet that used to be where the asteroid belt is now.
Either way cool video. Thanks for sharing.
There was never a planet there, not enough debris to even form one. Jupiter keeps us from having a 4th rocky planet, sigh, Jupiter why you hate on the inner planets?
Because, maybe, we have planetary mechanics, and solar system mechanics, ALL WRONG. The way I see it is, we have 5 billion years worth of ignorance to sort through. If Jupiter was such a magnetic suck to the whole area, why are there still any asteroids left in the asteroid belt? Would not of Jupiter drew them all in by now??? And besides, Jupiter may have been much smaller at one time, and I cant see any reliable way to determine the size of planets 4 billion years ago, except for earth.
Why would 1/10 of the planet stay in place and the rest fly off?
There was never a planet in the asteroid belt because of jupiter.