It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: SlapMonkey
hyper
originally posted by: Benevolent Heretic
a reply to: IAMTAT
OMG! He's got a boo-boo on his knee! LOL! Which is about as common as hypothyroidism, which I also have, and I take levothyroxine daily, too. Me and Bernie... We be mates!
You're so funny!
originally posted by: okrian
They are both serious, and both very easily treatable.
originally posted by: okrian
a reply to: SlapMonkey
This is entirely untrue. I opted to have my thyroid removed completely (and very glad i did this as opposed to "treating" it) because it is much easier to handle having no thyroid than having a malfunctioning one. I'll explain (hopefully quickly and concise).
...
The benefit of having no thyroid is that there is no thyroid hormone being produced by your body at all, which means you don't have to guess how much extra thyroid hormone to add. Your body is set to zero, that won't/can't change at all. Then it's much more simple to deduce the level you would need based on your age, sex, and weight. I've taken synthroid for years and it's completely a non-issue.
As long as I take the synthetic hormone every day it's just like my body is making it. No big deal, at all.
...
Slapmonkey, this sounds like an issue of not having a good endocrinologist, because as explained, no thyroid is always easier to treat (it makes the math much simpler). And I hope your wife finds one, cause this isn't a difficult problem to solve (was her surgery successful? is her thyroid actually all gone?). I'd ask some questions and find a new doc.
originally posted by: Benevolent Heretic
There's hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism. They are opposite conditions.