It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: FreeThinkerbychoice
I feel the very premise of animation, life or whatever you deem fit as a label to be the biggest anomaly that science still fails to quantify with in logical fundamental meaning.
originally posted by: FreeThinkerbychoice
Science can always explain the how but it fails miserably at explaining the why.
originally posted by: FreeThinkerbychoice
Merely observing social behavior can indicate the sheer strength of influence. It is fascinating how quickly one may adapt their behavior to fit into a group, even if it means temporarily overriding their own morality for fear of being left out.
originally posted by: FreeThinkerbychoice
The cold hard truth is their will never be an ultimate truth.
originally posted by: Ghost147
originally posted by: FreeThinkerbychoice
I feel the very premise of animation, life or whatever you deem fit as a label to be the biggest anomaly that science still fails to quantify with in logical fundamental meaning.
Science doesn't deal with 'meaning' that's what philosophy is. Science deals with 'how', not 'why'.
We use science as a tool to explain our observations of naturally occurring phenomena by means of how they function, and how they came to be.
'Meaning' is a 'why' not a 'how'.
originally posted by: FreeThinkerbychoice
Science can always explain the how but it fails miserably at explaining the why.
Looks like you beat me to it (I'm responding as I read). It's not that it fails at explaining why, it's that it simply never attempts to answer 'why' in the first place. That's not the purpose of Science.
originally posted by: FreeThinkerbychoice
Merely observing social behavior can indicate the sheer strength of influence. It is fascinating how quickly one may adapt their behavior to fit into a group, even if it means temporarily overriding their own morality for fear of being left out.
We can actually determine these factors by looking into the biological history of group-mentality, social species, and communal living. It all has to do with survival.
originally posted by: FreeThinkerbychoice
The cold hard truth is their will never be an ultimate truth.
This is true.
After reading your OP, I would say you're on the verge of being correct in your analyses, but you're forgetting one crucial point. Nothing may ever be absolutely certain, but that does not mean that everything we can observe provides no weight to coming to a conclusion.
For instance, we have never personally been to another planet. We can see them through telescopes, we can send probes to them and receive information back from them, but we have yet to personally go to one. Does that mean that we cannot come to the conclusion that planets exist? Of course not.
We have can objectively prove that planets exist through external factors, mathematics, observation of gravitational forces, so on and so forth. We can still come to a conclusion, regardless if we cannot be 100% certain on anything.
That is what many seem to forget.
originally posted by: GreatWay
a reply to: FreeThinkerbychoice
Hello,
The life experience as you might call it, or incarnation, is such that there is much confusion. As if a veil has been placed over your eyes and you can only see a fraction of what you saw before. The "not knowing" or "uncertainty" is with a purpose - for it is the misunderstanding and the mistakes that we make that creates new experience and understanding.
This is just my belief of course.
Namaste.