a reply to:
Swills
Here's the thing. It doesn't "make you dumb" or fry your brain cells. But, it does re-route your dopamine receptors, which effects the levels of
serotonin and other neural transmitter chemicals. And this "could" have an effect on the growth of the frontal lobe in an adolescent. This
"rerouting" of seratonin is similar to what ssri drugs like Zoloft do to the brain. Think of the brain like a big highway with many exits. These drugs
are like road construction, in which the current exits are blocked off and new exits are constructed. Are the new exits better or worse? Are the
lanes wider? Are the exits more efficient? Longer? Shorter? Will they cause more traffic jams or more accidents?
The frontal lobe doesn't stop growing until you are 25. So, repeated depletion of seratonin and dopamine inhibition might have an effect on its
growth, and thus might be negatively effecting the teenage brain. Truth is, we don't know what the effects are yet, or how severe. But, considering
these same chemicals are what steers and incentivises frontal lobe growth, it's not hard to imagine that it could effect the process.
No, it doesn't freeze brain cells, and no, it's not going to retard your iq growth. But, it does effect it... However minute. You simply cannot use
chemicals to trigger large doses of seratonin and not effect your brain. Another fear is that all drugs physically change your neural transmitters.
Opiate addicts have way more opiod u receptors than a normal brain. Why is that? Because, your brain will compensate for large repeated doses of
opiates by changing other receptors into opiod receptors in order to uptake this large dose of opiates. Marijuana would probably act in the same.
It also effects the growth of sperm tails. It breaks the rna chains that make up the tail. And that single broken sperm tail might belong to the sperm
that makes your child. What effects does this have on the subject?
Drugs are dangerous and should be thoroughly studied before promoted as "safe." We simply haven't done enough research to know the true effects of
these plants. Until we do, we should be extremely weary about promoting them as "good for you" or not dangerous. This goes for big pharma, every
alcohol manufacturer, and every dispensery.
Remember, people used to snort tobacco up their nasal passages, because they liked the feeling of the nicotine rush, and they thought sneezing was
good for you.
And just to clarify, I am for the legalization of all drugs. I don't think the government has the right or the authority to tell adults what they can
and can't put into their bodies. And I am all for ending the illegal drug trade and taking away the financial market from all of these gangs and
cartels that kill and rob innocent citizens. However, this doesn't mean we should stop researching and learning of the effects of these chemicals.
Just so long as they don't secretly test them on unknowing unwilling subjects by nepharious secret means.
edit on 19-1-2016 by SheepDipped because: (no reason given)
edit on 19-1-2016 by SheepDipped because: (no reason
given)
edit on 19-1-2016 by SheepDipped because: Cleaned and changed some choice words.
edit on 19-1-2016 by
SheepDipped because: (no reason given)
edit on 19-1-2016 by SheepDipped because: (no reason given)
edit on 19-1-2016
by SheepDipped because: (no reason given)
edit on 19-1-2016 by SheepDipped because: (no reason given)