It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
There is very little signal noise now. It isn't like in the old days where if someone got your signal by mistake you'd lose control.
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: Edumakated
There is very little signal noise now. It isn't like in the old days where if someone got your signal by mistake you'd lose control.
Like I said, I don't know about now. BuBack in the day, passing cars or motorcycles with magnetos , cb radios, the frequency produced by lawn mower spark plugs (spark gap generators) could provide just enough interference to disrupt signal or worse make a turn into the ground. Besides that I personally witnessed a theft one day. A car drove by with an antenna out the window, took over flight control on an expensive model plane in flight and everyone watched helplessly as the plane followed the receding car down the road.
The reason they also monitor frequencies beside noise or jamming is to detect if someone else is going to try to steal a plane.
Broad band interference or spikes that merge with operating planes are monitored on an oscilloscope on site.
Planes that fly at the same time checked in with the person monitoring.
Yeah, I recall. It doesn't really work that way anymore. Transmitters use 2.4ghz instead of FM signals like before.
originally posted by: Eilasvaleleyn
a reply to: starfoxxx
Point 1: You are generalizing all teenage girls as attention whores. Classy.
Point 2: It is a matter of choice. If someone wishes to go to the beach in a bikini, that is their prerogative and they are aware they may get a few surreptitious looks. It is another thing altogether being recorded while in your own backyard. If you are in a private pool and not the beach, then it stands to reason that you may not want others looking at you.
Point 3: This is also applies to young children, not only teenage girls who "love the attention."
Point 4: A shotgun's ability to solve this problem is dependent on what airspace the drone is in. If it is not on your property, then the owner may sue you for damaging it.
As a final note, before you say my argument is dumb, please correct your grammar. Thank you.
ETA: You can't even se it past 200 feet (I can't anyway) unless you have a cam on it & you're doing FPV flying. (First person view)
originally posted by: Freeyourchains
It has begun already...the taxation, registration, limitations on drones... www.popsci.com...
If you build a drone fron scratch or buy one, you have to give money to the FAA? What the hell? Soon they'll be charging us all $5 per window we own again.
originally posted by: DexterRiley
Model airplanes over 8 oz are also required to be registered.
Here is an FAA document the provides some examples of drones that require registration.
Have fun!
-dex
SBEGO "Pocket Drone Quadcopter 124" FQ777. Check it out!
Pocket drones are way smaller than those pictures in your link and they're way under 8ozs.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: Flatfish
That's what I've been having trouble adjusting to, is which lights are front and which are back. They're fun as hell to fly though. I have a Quadrone XLC.
originally posted by: DexterRiley
a reply to: schadenfreude
ETA: You can't even se it past 200 feet (I can't anyway) unless you have a cam on it & you're doing FPV flying. (First person view)
Sounds like one of those "software updates" that someone else mentioned earlier in the thread probably disabled that feature. Don't you just love it when the vendors help you protect yourself from yourself?
I expect that some type of open source program will emerge in the near future that restores the owner's freedom to operate their purchase in whatever way they see fit.
-dex
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: Flatfish
I spent the first night doing that and chasing the dogs around our hotel room. Haha.