It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: JohnnyElohim
originally posted by: Vector99
originally posted by: JohnnyElohim
originally posted by: dragonridr
originally posted by: JohnnyElohim
originally posted by: Vector99
a reply to: Prezbo369
Yea lets not call an apple an apple.
You should probably supply context and sourcing for those photographs. One is of rioters in Baltimore in the wake of the Freddie Gray incident. The other is of FSA fighters in Syria. What is your point in comparing the two with no context or explanation?
Think they are trying to point out vandalism is another form if terrorism. It can be but not always depends on if it is intentional. For exmple trying to shut down an airport intentionally that is terrorism. But if a random riot broke out closing the airport the intent wasn't there. It was just a consequence of the riot. In the case of BLM they are intentionally trying to disrupt society in order to change policy. That is the very definition of a terrorist.
They might be trying to say that.
The two photos I posted were for contrast. Only one of them depicted "terrorists". You assumed they both did. Media has done it's job.
Neither of them depicted terrorists. Neither of them depicted BLM protestors.
a person who uses terrorism in the pursuit of political aims
originally posted by: Vector99
originally posted by: JohnnyElohim
originally posted by: Vector99
originally posted by: JohnnyElohim
originally posted by: dragonridr
originally posted by: JohnnyElohim
originally posted by: Vector99
a reply to: Prezbo369
Yea lets not call an apple an apple.
You should probably supply context and sourcing for those photographs. One is of rioters in Baltimore in the wake of the Freddie Gray incident. The other is of FSA fighters in Syria. What is your point in comparing the two with no context or explanation?
Think they are trying to point out vandalism is another form if terrorism. It can be but not always depends on if it is intentional. For exmple trying to shut down an airport intentionally that is terrorism. But if a random riot broke out closing the airport the intent wasn't there. It was just a consequence of the riot. In the case of BLM they are intentionally trying to disrupt society in order to change policy. That is the very definition of a terrorist.
They might be trying to say that.
The two photos I posted were for contrast. Only one of them depicted "terrorists". You assumed they both did. Media has done it's job.
Neither of them depicted terrorists. Neither of them depicted BLM protestors.
Definition of terrorist.
a person who uses terrorism in the pursuit of political aims
the use of violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims.
originally posted by: Vector99
originally posted by: Vector99
originally posted by: JohnnyElohim
originally posted by: Vector99
originally posted by: JohnnyElohim
originally posted by: dragonridr
originally posted by: JohnnyElohim
originally posted by: Vector99
a reply to: Prezbo369
Yea lets not call an apple an apple.
You should probably supply context and sourcing for those photographs. One is of rioters in Baltimore in the wake of the Freddie Gray incident. The other is of FSA fighters in Syria. What is your point in comparing the two with no context or explanation?
Think they are trying to point out vandalism is another form if terrorism. It can be but not always depends on if it is intentional. For exmple trying to shut down an airport intentionally that is terrorism. But if a random riot broke out closing the airport the intent wasn't there. It was just a consequence of the riot. In the case of BLM they are intentionally trying to disrupt society in order to change policy. That is the very definition of a terrorist.
They might be trying to say that.
The two photos I posted were for contrast. Only one of them depicted "terrorists". You assumed they both did. Media has done it's job.
Neither of them depicted terrorists. Neither of them depicted BLM protestors.
Definition of terrorist.
a person who uses terrorism in the pursuit of political aims
Definition of terrorism
the use of violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims.
oops meant to edit, not reply to myself
originally posted by: Vector99
originally posted by: Vector99
originally posted by: JohnnyElohim
originally posted by: Vector99
originally posted by: JohnnyElohim
originally posted by: dragonridr
originally posted by: JohnnyElohim
originally posted by: Vector99
a reply to: Prezbo369
Yea lets not call an apple an apple.
You should probably supply context and sourcing for those photographs. One is of rioters in Baltimore in the wake of the Freddie Gray incident. The other is of FSA fighters in Syria. What is your point in comparing the two with no context or explanation?
Think they are trying to point out vandalism is another form if terrorism. It can be but not always depends on if it is intentional. For exmple trying to shut down an airport intentionally that is terrorism. But if a random riot broke out closing the airport the intent wasn't there. It was just a consequence of the riot. In the case of BLM they are intentionally trying to disrupt society in order to change policy. That is the very definition of a terrorist.
They might be trying to say that.
The two photos I posted were for contrast. Only one of them depicted "terrorists". You assumed they both did. Media has done it's job.
Neither of them depicted terrorists. Neither of them depicted BLM protestors.
Definition of terrorist.
a person who uses terrorism in the pursuit of political aims
Definition of terrorism
the use of violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims.
oops meant to edit, not reply to myself
originally posted by: Prezbo369
Yeah this has always been the way with protests, whether they're on public or private property. But now because it's black people they're terrorists?.....so very very pathetic...
originally posted by: JohnnyElohim
originally posted by: Vector99
originally posted by: Vector99
originally posted by: JohnnyElohim
originally posted by: Vector99
originally posted by: JohnnyElohim
originally posted by: dragonridr
originally posted by: JohnnyElohim
originally posted by: Vector99
a reply to: Prezbo369
Yea lets not call an apple an apple.
You should probably supply context and sourcing for those photographs. One is of rioters in Baltimore in the wake of the Freddie Gray incident. The other is of FSA fighters in Syria. What is your point in comparing the two with no context or explanation?
Think they are trying to point out vandalism is another form if terrorism. It can be but not always depends on if it is intentional. For exmple trying to shut down an airport intentionally that is terrorism. But if a random riot broke out closing the airport the intent wasn't there. It was just a consequence of the riot. In the case of BLM they are intentionally trying to disrupt society in order to change policy. That is the very definition of a terrorist.
They might be trying to say that.
The two photos I posted were for contrast. Only one of them depicted "terrorists". You assumed they both did. Media has done it's job.
Neither of them depicted terrorists. Neither of them depicted BLM protestors.
Definition of terrorist.
a person who uses terrorism in the pursuit of political aims
Definition of terrorism
the use of violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims.
oops meant to edit, not reply to myself
Sigh.
Property damage is not violence,
originally posted by: Vector99
originally posted by: JohnnyElohim
originally posted by: Vector99
originally posted by: Vector99
originally posted by: JohnnyElohim
originally posted by: Vector99
originally posted by: JohnnyElohim
originally posted by: dragonridr
originally posted by: JohnnyElohim
originally posted by: Vector99
a reply to: Prezbo369
Yea lets not call an apple an apple.
You should probably supply context and sourcing for those photographs. One is of rioters in Baltimore in the wake of the Freddie Gray incident. The other is of FSA fighters in Syria. What is your point in comparing the two with no context or explanation?
Think they are trying to point out vandalism is another form if terrorism. It can be but not always depends on if it is intentional. For exmple trying to shut down an airport intentionally that is terrorism. But if a random riot broke out closing the airport the intent wasn't there. It was just a consequence of the riot. In the case of BLM they are intentionally trying to disrupt society in order to change policy. That is the very definition of a terrorist.
They might be trying to say that.
The two photos I posted were for contrast. Only one of them depicted "terrorists". You assumed they both did. Media has done it's job.
Neither of them depicted terrorists. Neither of them depicted BLM protestors.
Definition of terrorist.
a person who uses terrorism in the pursuit of political aims
Definition of terrorism
the use of violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims.
oops meant to edit, not reply to myself
Sigh.
Property damage is not violence,
Really? what would you define it as?
originally posted by: Vector99
originally posted by: JohnnyElohim
originally posted by: Vector99
originally posted by: Vector99
originally posted by: JohnnyElohim
originally posted by: Vector99
originally posted by: JohnnyElohim
originally posted by: dragonridr
originally posted by: JohnnyElohim
originally posted by: Vector99
a reply to: Prezbo369
Yea lets not call an apple an apple.
You should probably supply context and sourcing for those photographs. One is of rioters in Baltimore in the wake of the Freddie Gray incident. The other is of FSA fighters in Syria. What is your point in comparing the two with no context or explanation?
Think they are trying to point out vandalism is another form if terrorism. It can be but not always depends on if it is intentional. For exmple trying to shut down an airport intentionally that is terrorism. But if a random riot broke out closing the airport the intent wasn't there. It was just a consequence of the riot. In the case of BLM they are intentionally trying to disrupt society in order to change policy. That is the very definition of a terrorist.
They might be trying to say that.
The two photos I posted were for contrast. Only one of them depicted "terrorists". You assumed they both did. Media has done it's job.
Neither of them depicted terrorists. Neither of them depicted BLM protestors.
Definition of terrorist.
a person who uses terrorism in the pursuit of political aims
Definition of terrorism
the use of violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims.
oops meant to edit, not reply to myself
Sigh.
Property damage is not violence,
Really? what would you define it as?
originally posted by: dragonridr
originally posted by: Vector99
originally posted by: JohnnyElohim
originally posted by: Vector99
originally posted by: Vector99
originally posted by: JohnnyElohim
originally posted by: Vector99
originally posted by: JohnnyElohim
originally posted by: dragonridr
originally posted by: JohnnyElohim
originally posted by: Vector99
a reply to: Prezbo369
Yea lets not call an apple an apple.
You should probably supply context and sourcing for those photographs. One is of rioters in Baltimore in the wake of the Freddie Gray incident. The other is of FSA fighters in Syria. What is your point in comparing the two with no context or explanation?
Think they are trying to point out vandalism is another form if terrorism. It can be but not always depends on if it is intentional. For exmple trying to shut down an airport intentionally that is terrorism. But if a random riot broke out closing the airport the intent wasn't there. It was just a consequence of the riot. In the case of BLM they are intentionally trying to disrupt society in order to change policy. That is the very definition of a terrorist.
They might be trying to say that.
The two photos I posted were for contrast. Only one of them depicted "terrorists". You assumed they both did. Media has done it's job.
Neither of them depicted terrorists. Neither of them depicted BLM protestors.
Definition of terrorist.
a person who uses terrorism in the pursuit of political aims
Definition of terrorism
the use of violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims.
oops meant to edit, not reply to myself
Sigh.
Property damage is not violence,
Really? what would you define it as?
Apparently violence is just normal everyday thing around his house. Guessing he lives in Syria somewhere. Damaging property or threatening someone. I could say if you don't do what I want I will destroy tour home or business. Could threaten to make sure you can't open your business mafia used this one its called extortion.
originally posted by: Vector99
a reply to: JohnnyElohim
Would it be better if I labeled it as "domestic terrorism"?
A duck is a duck no matter how it quacks.
originally posted by: Vector99
a reply to: JohnnyElohim
They were British Terrorists.
originally posted by: JohnnyElohim
originally posted by: Vector99
a reply to: JohnnyElohim
Would it be better if I labeled it as "domestic terrorism"?
A duck is a duck no matter how it quacks.
So the Boston Tea Party was most certainly one of the earliest acts of Domestic Terrorism. The Sons of Liberty organized an effort to destroy property to make a political point. Yes? I'm not sure we want every instance of property damage that occurs in a political context to be considered terrorism. Are you?
originally posted by: SheopleNation
a reply to: theySeeme
No, Actually all that you seen were reports that 3 masked men fired into a crowd of BLM protesters, which somehow they knew they were white.
You also convenientlyy left out the fact that there were no arrests, no suspects and no proof.
originally posted by: SheopleNation
a reply to: theySeeme
You also convenientlyy left out the fact that there were no arrests, no suspects and no proof.
originally posted by: SheopleNation
a reply to: theySeeme
I mean if we are going to just make reckless assumptions with no evidence to back them up. ~$heopleNation