posted on Nov, 21 2015 @ 01:10 PM
a reply to:
TXRabbit
I read half the thread by AstroEngineer last night and the rest this afternoon. Twenty one pages and he only got to the first part of section three!
A few of the comments regarding legitimacy mirrored my own at the time I first read the account the 2010. Most of the thread was members arguing.
In his last post he did say he would complete the sections on his blog first and then come back to ATS to post the remaining parts. He may well have
seen the thread closed and with all the negative comments thought to himself "why bother?". So only two and half sections were reviewed on ATS and
yet the blog has twelve sections. A quick scan and look at a few comments revealed a few ATS members continued the discussion on his blog. It is a
shame no one started a new thread with links to the remaining sections to discuss the claims.
I am going to read his blog again tonight followed by the comments as I am still undecided. From the actual thread we get the following from ATS
members.
a) a very sophisticated troll
b) a creative writer testing an idea in a surreptitious way
c) deliberate disinformation (a few agendas proposed)
d) genuine
I would also add paranoid schizophrenia to the list as a potential. Paranoid schizophrenics are often very intelligent. Combine this with some
engineering/computer experience and then add psychosis and paranoia into the equation.
It is interesting that his blog has not been updated since 2010. Maybe he has gone into hiding or maybe sectioned. Maybe *they* got him