It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The Crimes of Sexual Predator Bill Clinton and his Treasonous Wife Hilary

page: 2
29
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 5 2015 @ 07:06 PM
link   
a reply to: reldra

possible pedophilia: stonezone.com...
tainted Blood: bulldognews.net...
1984arkansasmotheroftheyear.blogspot.com...
And what is not treasonous about Hilary violating her oath to not delete governmental records, the clintons profiting from a russian uranium dea,l etc.



posted on Nov, 5 2015 @ 07:11 PM
link   

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: Enochstask

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: Enochstask

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: Enochstask

originally posted by: Blazemore2000
I think you've confused Bill Clinton with Bill Cosby. Sexual predator? If that's true, then our country is over run with sexual predators. Sensationalize much?


So when your 20 year comes home in tears one day after her boss ejaculates on her blue dress you are cool with it?


Monica Lewinsky was not in tears, though. She saved the dress that way for sentimental reasons. She was young, successful and having an affair with the President. She was happy. It also started when she was 22. She lived on her own, you make it sound like she came home to parents.


I believe you are wrong, and here is why. After the assault by her boss, which by the way is against the law and why we have sexual harassment laws, she called Linda Tripp on the phone crying and that is how the whole thing became public.
I posted a link to the C-Span hearing tapes.

www.c-span.org...


This was an ongoing affair. She spoke to Linda Tripp about it often, thinking she was confiding in a trustworthy friend. Boy, was she wrong. Monica Lewinsky was not an assault victim.


The initial phone call Monica was in tears. Under sexual harassment law when a person in charge of a subordinate has sexual relations with the subordinate it is considered assault.


No, it is not. If the attention is unwanted it is. If a threat is made regarding one's employment status, it is also.
You really think that a boss having an affair with a subordinate is against the law? That is categorically false.

It was an emotional phone call, but the incident was consensual. The incidents to follow were also.


You're right they were two kids in love and I have no idea what I am talking about. So when your daughter comes home with her blue dress soiled one day you two can high five.



posted on Nov, 5 2015 @ 07:17 PM
link   

originally posted by: ancap4liberty
a reply to: reldra

possible pedophilia: stonezone.com...
tainted Blood: bulldognews.net...
1984arkansasmotheroftheyear.blogspot.com...
And what is not treasonous about Hilary violating her oath to not delete governmental records, the clintons profiting from a russian uranium dea,l etc.


The first article is ridiculous. Clinton is a pedophile because he has met Bill Epstein, Alan Dershowitz and Prince Andrew?
I have met Alan Dershowitz, my mother is an attorney and did some research for him at one time. Are you going to add me to this 6 degrees of kevin Bacon thing?

The second goes over the same information about the 'blood program' as the article I referenced before. It suggests Vince Foster may have known something about it or tried to cover parts of it, but gives no proof. Just really flimsy conjecture.

The last article is all conjecture.



posted on Nov, 5 2015 @ 07:20 PM
link   

originally posted by: Enochstask

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: Enochstask

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: Enochstask

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: Enochstask

originally posted by: Blazemore2000
I think you've confused Bill Clinton with Bill Cosby. Sexual predator? If that's true, then our country is over run with sexual predators. Sensationalize much?


So when your 20 year comes home in tears one day after her boss ejaculates on her blue dress you are cool with it?


Monica Lewinsky was not in tears, though. She saved the dress that way for sentimental reasons. She was young, successful and having an affair with the President. She was happy. It also started when she was 22. She lived on her own, you make it sound like she came home to parents.


I believe you are wrong, and here is why. After the assault by her boss, which by the way is against the law and why we have sexual harassment laws, she called Linda Tripp on the phone crying and that is how the whole thing became public.
I posted a link to the C-Span hearing tapes.

www.c-span.org...


This was an ongoing affair. She spoke to Linda Tripp about it often, thinking she was confiding in a trustworthy friend. Boy, was she wrong. Monica Lewinsky was not an assault victim.


The initial phone call Monica was in tears. Under sexual harassment law when a person in charge of a subordinate has sexual relations with the subordinate it is considered assault.


No, it is not. If the attention is unwanted it is. If a threat is made regarding one's employment status, it is also.
You really think that a boss having an affair with a subordinate is against the law? That is categorically false.

It was an emotional phone call, but the incident was consensual. The incidents to follow were also.


You're right they were two kids in love and I have no idea what I am talking about. So when your daughter comes home with her blue dress soiled one day you two can high five.


They were both adults. They had an affair. If my daughter is ever sexually assaulted, that will be a tragedy, at any age. If I learn that she has had an affair with a married man, I will tell her it would likely end in heartbreak if she is in love with him.

You are just obsessed over this blue dress and it's contents.


edit on 5-11-2015 by reldra because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 5 2015 @ 07:28 PM
link   

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: Enochstask

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: Enochstask

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: Enochstask

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: Enochstask

originally posted by: Blazemore2000
I think you've confused Bill Clinton with Bill Cosby. Sexual predator? If that's true, then our country is over run with sexual predators. Sensationalize much?


So when your 20 year comes home in tears one day after her boss ejaculates on her blue dress you are cool with it?


Monica Lewinsky was not in tears, though. She saved the dress that way for sentimental reasons. She was young, successful and having an affair with the President. She was happy. It also started when she was 22. She lived on her own, you make it sound like she came home to parents.


I believe you are wrong, and here is why. After the assault by her boss, which by the way is against the law and why we have sexual harassment laws, she called Linda Tripp on the phone crying and that is how the whole thing became public.
I posted a link to the C-Span hearing tapes.

www.c-span.org...


This was an ongoing affair. She spoke to Linda Tripp about it often, thinking she was confiding in a trustworthy friend. Boy, was she wrong. Monica Lewinsky was not an assault victim.


The initial phone call Monica was in tears. Under sexual harassment law when a person in charge of a subordinate has sexual relations with the subordinate it is considered assault.


No, it is not. If the attention is unwanted it is. If a threat is made regarding one's employment status, it is also.
You really think that a boss having an affair with a subordinate is against the law? That is categorically false.

It was an emotional phone call, but the incident was consensual. The incidents to follow were also.


You're right they were two kids in love and I have no idea what I am talking about. So when your daughter comes home with her blue dress soiled one day you two can high five.


They were both adults. They had an affair. If my daughter is ever sexually assaulted, that will be a tragedy, at any age. If I learn that she has had an affair with a married man, I will tell her it would likely end in heartbreak if she is in love with him.

You are just obsessed over this blue dress and it's contents.



See I see it the other way around. I think you are obsessed with defending Frosty the Hag and her creepy pervert husband at all cost. Oh well, I guess we all need a hobby.



posted on Nov, 5 2015 @ 07:35 PM
link   

originally posted by: Enochstask

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: Enochstask

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: Enochstask

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: Enochstask

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: Enochstask

originally posted by: Blazemore2000
I think you've confused Bill Clinton with Bill Cosby. Sexual predator? If that's true, then our country is over run with sexual predators. Sensationalize much?


So when your 20 year comes home in tears one day after her boss ejaculates on her blue dress you are cool with it?


Monica Lewinsky was not in tears, though. She saved the dress that way for sentimental reasons. She was young, successful and having an affair with the President. She was happy. It also started when she was 22. She lived on her own, you make it sound like she came home to parents.


I believe you are wrong, and here is why. After the assault by her boss, which by the way is against the law and why we have sexual harassment laws, she called Linda Tripp on the phone crying and that is how the whole thing became public.
I posted a link to the C-Span hearing tapes.

www.c-span.org...


This was an ongoing affair. She spoke to Linda Tripp about it often, thinking she was confiding in a trustworthy friend. Boy, was she wrong. Monica Lewinsky was not an assault victim.


The initial phone call Monica was in tears. Under sexual harassment law when a person in charge of a subordinate has sexual relations with the subordinate it is considered assault.


No, it is not. If the attention is unwanted it is. If a threat is made regarding one's employment status, it is also.
You really think that a boss having an affair with a subordinate is against the law? That is categorically false.

It was an emotional phone call, but the incident was consensual. The incidents to follow were also.


You're right they were two kids in love and I have no idea what I am talking about. So when your daughter comes home with her blue dress soiled one day you two can high five.


They were both adults. They had an affair. If my daughter is ever sexually assaulted, that will be a tragedy, at any age. If I learn that she has had an affair with a married man, I will tell her it would likely end in heartbreak if she is in love with him.

You are just obsessed over this blue dress and it's contents.



See I see it the other way around. I think you are obsessed with defending Frosty the Hag and her creepy pervert husband at all cost. Oh well, I guess we all need a hobby.


I am not defending them. I am stating facts. What way around are you going?

You stated it was assault for a boss to have sexual relations with a subordinate, it is not. She has never said she was assaulted. You acted as if Monica Lewinsky was a child, she was not. I am not sure what you are on about.



posted on Nov, 5 2015 @ 07:40 PM
link   

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: Enochstask

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: Enochstask

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: Enochstask

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: Enochstask

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: Enochstask

originally posted by: Blazemore2000
I think you've confused Bill Clinton with Bill Cosby. Sexual predator? If that's true, then our country is over run with sexual predators. Sensationalize much?


So when your 20 year comes home in tears one day after her boss ejaculates on her blue dress you are cool with it?


Monica Lewinsky was not in tears, though. She saved the dress that way for sentimental reasons. She was young, successful and having an affair with the President. She was happy. It also started when she was 22. She lived on her own, you make it sound like she came home to parents.


I believe you are wrong, and here is why. After the assault by her boss, which by the way is against the law and why we have sexual harassment laws, she called Linda Tripp on the phone crying and that is how the whole thing became public.
I posted a link to the C-Span hearing tapes.

www.c-span.org...


This was an ongoing affair. She spoke to Linda Tripp about it often, thinking she was confiding in a trustworthy friend. Boy, was she wrong. Monica Lewinsky was not an assault victim.


The initial phone call Monica was in tears. Under sexual harassment law when a person in charge of a subordinate has sexual relations with the subordinate it is considered assault.


No, it is not. If the attention is unwanted it is. If a threat is made regarding one's employment status, it is also.
You really think that a boss having an affair with a subordinate is against the law? That is categorically false.

It was an emotional phone call, but the incident was consensual. The incidents to follow were also.


You're right they were two kids in love and I have no idea what I am talking about. So when your daughter comes home with her blue dress soiled one day you two can high five.


They were both adults. They had an affair. If my daughter is ever sexually assaulted, that will be a tragedy, at any age. If I learn that she has had an affair with a married man, I will tell her it would likely end in heartbreak if she is in love with him.

You are just obsessed over this blue dress and it's contents.



See I see it the other way around. I think you are obsessed with defending Frosty the Hag and her creepy pervert husband at all cost. Oh well, I guess we all need a hobby.


I am not defending them. I am stating facts. What way around are you going?

You stated it was assault for a boss to have sexual relations with a subordinate, it is not. She has never said she was assaulted. You acted as if Monica Lewinsky was a child, she was not. I am not sure what you are on about.


You came to me I didn't come to you. What I am "on about" now is your fanatic desire to constantly defend Frosty the Hag and her husband that flies to pedophile island.



posted on Nov, 5 2015 @ 07:49 PM
link   

originally posted by: reldra



No, it is not. If the attention is unwanted it is. If a threat is made regarding one's employment status, it is also.
You really think that a boss having an affair with a subordinate is against the law? That is categorically false.

It was an emotional phone call, but the incident was consensual. The incidents to follow were also.


That's right...unwanted is the word. Why do people twist things in a forum like this as if they were the person involved.
Besides the OP does not include Monica Lewinsky who is seems was at work in the, ' comparable' incident, while the others seem to have been alone with Clinton in a hotel room. The whole thing is stupid. Clinton lied in the aftermath over what was, or had been an ongoing liason, that was stupid, the impeachment idea was political, and stupid.



posted on Nov, 5 2015 @ 08:03 PM
link   
Ha ha.

Bill "Kiss It" Clinton



posted on Nov, 5 2015 @ 08:33 PM
link   
a reply to: ancap4liberty

Lets not forget the guy that invited him to the UK while there taking advantage of a few little kiddies.



posted on Nov, 5 2015 @ 08:36 PM
link   
Read the Clinton's War on Women by Robert Stone and then come back and make comments about how great the Clintons are. ANYONE who would vote for Hillary Clinton is proof that Americans and their core education values are quite devoid of critical thinking or common sense.

oh, and by the way, when to the US population start acting like electing a POTUS is akin to a High School president election?!

I would not really vote for any of the current batch, however never ever that shell calling itself a human, Hillary!



posted on Nov, 6 2015 @ 09:56 AM
link   

originally posted by: Blazemore2000
I think you've confused Bill Clinton with Bill Cosby. Sexual predator? If that's true, then our country is over run with sexual predators. Sensationalize much?


Hide your head in the sand. The truth would blow your mind.



posted on Nov, 6 2015 @ 03:01 PM
link   
a reply to: HighDesertPatriot
It's hilarious that you accuse ppl of hiding their head in the sand, when all you do is spew BS propaganda. It's also hilarious that you think you can quantify what would "blow my mind".... or that you even have the first clue as to what truth is.



posted on Nov, 6 2015 @ 03:06 PM
link   
a reply to: Blazemore2000

You're a Clinton fanboy, I get it.



posted on Nov, 6 2015 @ 03:08 PM
link   
a reply to: HighDesertPatriot

Correction, I'm a Sanders fan boy. You're a fox news zombie. There... all fixed.



posted on Nov, 6 2015 @ 04:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: Blazemore2000
a reply to: HighDesertPatriot

Correction, I'm a Sanders fan boy. You're a fox news zombie. There... all fixed.


Not possible - I haven't had cable for 13 years.

Double fixed.



posted on Nov, 9 2015 @ 01:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sublimecraft
a reply to: ancap4liberty

If lying, cheating, and deception were drugs, this pair would be full blown junkies.


More like dealers




top topics



 
29
<< 1   >>

log in

join