It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Bone75
I'm not a dino-denier, nor am I feathered-dino-denier. In fact, I'd say a feathered dinosaur throws a pretty significant monkey wrench into the whole "unguided" aspect of evolutionary theory.
originally posted by: deadeyedick
So a blanket statement that if one believes in the bible then they could not possibly know any other subject.
Billions disagree with you.
originally posted by: deadeyedick
Oh and there you go.
People that do not buy this theory should not be able to teach.
So much blind hate for alternative theorist these days.
originally posted by: peter vlar
a reply to: trifecta
What exactly does the Smithsonian have to do with University of Alberta, in Canada, where the specimen was found? That's who ran this study. The Smithsonian had nothing to do with it. Was finding the link and reading the article that difficult or do you prefer to just express your umbrage towards science based purely on ignorance all the time?
The discovery is shedding light on the convergent evolution of these dinosaurs with ostriches and emus relating to thermoregulation and is also tightening the linkages between dinosaurs and modern birds.
originally posted by: trifecta
Acedemia is by far one of the most incestuous of institutions on Multinational scale.
originally posted by: Cypress
originally posted by: deadeyedick
Oh and there you go.
People that do not buy this theory should not be able to teach.
So much blind hate for alternative theorist these days.
The problem with your statement is that creationism is not a viable alternative to the theory of evolution, has zero evidence supporting it and is a fraudulent approach to teaching.