Stunning Warning: War Coming to Europe

If I wanted to read this type of crap everyday I would not be coming to ATS. It used to be about conspiracy theories and some partisan political debate. It seems the place has just turned into a frenzy of anti Muslim anti immigrant fear mongering. If people want to get their views from sources like jihadwatch and other such filth, just stay on those sites and leave that crap there. You could always go to storm front, where you can share your views without being challenged by lefties and liberals. It's getting beyond boring. To something more sinister. It's obviously causing a lot of you to irrationally hate people you've never met before based on dodgy articles and reporting. There's plenty of groups out there you can join who have their own websites, where the knuckle draggers can hang out frothing at the mouth over the latest jihadwatch article.

So can any of the bleeding hearts step up and tell me where you reside, globally?

I mean you must have first hand experience if you are able to make such statements about "anti muslim fear mongering propaganda". I mean you must have loads of positive experiences with these people.

Or do you maybe have no experience at all. That could be an explanation too.

a reply to: woodwardjnr

Thank you. A well worded response to all this hate on this site.

originally posted by: OHTheHumanity
So can any of the bleeding hearts step up and tell me where you reside, globally?

I mean you must have first hand experience if you are able to make such statements about "anti muslim fear mongering propaganda". I mean you must have loads of positive experiences with these people.

Or do you maybe have no experience at all. That could be an explanation too.

And would you even believe that I have the experience?
That a crowd of 3.000 refugees is indistinguishable in its behaviour to a crowd of 3.000 locals if treated the same way?

a reply to: woodwardjnr

You could always go to storm front, where you can share your views without being challenged by lefties and liberals. It's getting beyond boring. To something more sinister. It's obviously causing a lot of you to irrationally hate people you've never met before based on dodgy articles and reporting. There's plenty of groups out there you can join who have their own websites, where the knuckle draggers can hang out frothing at the mouth over the latest jihadwatch article.

Here you can see how disgusting the leftist PC horde is. Again, people voicing their legitimate concerns, while not even remotely breaking the T&C of ATS, are being associated with racism, populism and stupidity, even suggesting that their concerns are not welcome here, basically trying to exterminate the opposing viewpoint, which in a lot of cases, at least in my case, is based on personal experiences.

You people truly disgust me.

a reply to: tony9802

Would you PLEASE stop posting rhetorical nonsense featuring that thrice cursed Gellar woman? She is a racist and a bigot, and her OPINIONS are not based on fact, but on her psychopathology. As sources go, she is about as reliable as a lead life jacket.

a reply to: tony9802
Pamela Geller cribs most of her stuff from Memri dot org, which is Bibi Netanyaus personal mouthpiece. go look at their board of directors.
That said, I scan Pamela every day for years, and i believe the Islamic threat is real. it is a repeat of the near successful Islamic invasion of Europe around 1100. see historian Bill Warner.
Only this time there are traitors within Europe and the United States inviting them in. and guess who.

a reply to: ManFromEurope

And would you even believe that I have the experience?

All I see is that you didn't answer the question for some reason.

That a crowd of 3.000 refugees is indistinguishable in its behaviour to a crowd of 3.000 locals if treated the same way?

I wasn't talking about refugees, directly.

Anyways, if that is the argument you are going to use, I can rest my case. I think the last months there were enough reports of mayhem in refugee centres. Do I need to post some sources?

a reply to: tony9802

I tend to agree with the article, but I wonder if that is because I am reading so much similar propaganda that has no basis in fact.

a reply to: TrueBrit

Geller is only one of a bunch people being qouted by the article.

Maybe you should put in an effort to discredit the others too.

a reply to: OHTheHumanity if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck

a reply to: OHTheHumanity

I really do not need to!

By associating themselves with, and having views which echo those of a confirmed xenophobe, they invalidate their own positions entirely! Everything they have said in that article, and if mean every single letter of it, is based on horrifically spun information, and relies on the reader having made certain erroneous assumptions before having read the piece, in order to have that reader believe what is written therein.

It is a nonsense, and as such it would be a complete and utter waste of time, to examine the depths of the ignorance which went into creating the article. The answer is deep, the evidence is the existence of the article itself, and putting in further effort than that with regard to examining this article, would be to offer the article more respect than it, or the morally and ethically defunct people who contributed to it, could ever hope to deserve.

a reply to: TrueBrit

That's a lot of empty rethoric, not refuting anything. Off course that is what you do, use a lot of, what you think are fancy words, to make it sound like you have something substantial to say, when you really don't.

Ever.

if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck

Then why are you ignoring the widespread problems with muslims in western societies?

I'm curious about this new key-word "xenophobe". It sure is being used rather, no pun intended, liberally here.

But if I understand correctly, that is the label being given( by those that profess to hate labels!) to anyone that opposes what is basically a silent invasion, a soft coup....is that correct? Sure it is.

All I'm really hearing is :"Agree with us, conform with us, or you are a XENOPHOBE!" There is always, always, a label...

Fine then. I will wear that label if it means protesting a group of barbarians with a medieval anti-female, anti freedom, anti-everything mindset that seem hell bent on spreading their belief system at sword point.

Wake the hell up Europe, and ignore the cries of the leftist apologist.

a reply to: OHTheHumanity

I'm not, why are you ignoring the recent history of the west actions in the Middle East. 1st America blames Iraq for 911 we go to war based on lies to democratic societies hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqi men women and children are killed through our actions and unjust sanction campaign. Then we spend 11 years in Afghanistan tearing up another Muslim country. Then we have our disastrous campaign in Libya after bombing the wests former ally gadaffi. The U.K. And USA support the biggest dictator in the region, Saudi Arabia, which spreads its hardline version of Islam around the globe with little or no objection from the west as long as these brutal regimes keep buying our weapons contracts and supplying oil. We are the ones who have dished out more death on Muslims than the other way around. Yet they are the terrorists who should be feared. Our bombs are freedom and democracy bombs and only cause collateral damage. We rain terror from the skies over muslims who have never done us any harm apart from to be born into another culture on the other side of the world. So let's just try and get a bit of perspective or is that too much to contemplate

a reply to: woodwardjnr

Wow, what a load of apologist BS.

I cant believe this. First you deny that there is a problem. Then you refuse to tell me on what experience you base you viewpoint on, and then you are basically suggesting that whatever happens in Europe is somehow justified because of the actions of Western governments in the Middle East, and that this somehow rules out the valid concerns that are being put out.

Just look how crazy the leftist PC horde's propaganda is.

a reply to: OHTheHumanity

If there was any legitimacy to the article do you really think WND would have needed to write their own employees and contributors? Do you think they would have had to use duplicitous language to make it sound like Davis was a Stanford professor? What makes the opinion of Geller and Davis so valid? I mean they are Americans living far away from the refugee crisis.

originally posted by: Hyperia
a reply to: tony9802

Im patriotic and very, very, very conservative..

You are nothing but a racist, thats it..

I don't really know what that word means..



I can tell you one thing though: I do not let criminals get away with it just because they're *****.



I'll leave it to you to fill in the blanks; a simple endeavor according to your personal preference, your personal experience-
from wherever you may be...

We are wallowing in a global recession/depression or whatever you may refer to it as....

It's the banks that benefit from our being tricked into dying for pointless reasons in pointless wars.

Do the math, that's all the world has been reduced to.

She may be correct but for all the wrong reason.