It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Bleeeeep
a reply to: WCmutant
No, I'm on topic - I am just addressing the fact that you are ever so causally getting ahead of yourself: wanting to start thinking about a new economic model before an end to the current one is even in sight.
Inflation, hyperinflation, and the numbers on the paper do not matter - what matters is the promises made. That is, if the economy does collapse, the promises will still be up held: we will all have to sell our stuff, and that, in turn, would make their currency stronger, as they will then have real assets (it is a fail safe for them that has always been there but you are not accounting for it). And if that did happen, we would be left having to live with less or borrow again, just like in 1929.
Your idea, that the gov would ever tell them to go fed themselves, is ludicrous.
Anyways, I'm out. Good luck thinking up a new model.
The low labor participation rate is not all baby boomers and people entering into retirement. Below is a graph of the labor participation rate for those between the ages of 25 to 54. These are the prime working years, so one cannot blame retirement and college on the declining participation rate. The 25 to 54 age bracket labor participation rates have not been this low since the 1980's recession and the rate stands at a three month static 80.8%.
originally posted by: cenpuppie
a reply to: WCmutant
Here is the picture for seniors, GAO report shows that half of Americans 55 and older have no retirement savings at all .
Looks like the motto is, work till you die