It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: jrod
a reply to: NoCorruptionAllowed
That is not true.
I remember concerns about global warming being raised in the early 90's when Bush I was still in office.
No data has been manipulated, to write such a tells me that you are ignorant of the actual science and need to stop believing the BS people like Rush spew.
originally posted by: ~Lucidity
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Have you seen this one?
Sixty Years of Data Show Waves are Getting Stronger, Threatening Coastlines and Infrastructure
originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Utt Oh , Better Buy a Boat........If You Actually Believe that Fiction .
originally posted by: ParasuvO
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: HighDesertPatriot
So I am back after a long absence, and I find it amusing that this climate warming change nonsense still gets traction here.
Maybe because it's real...
Let us know where it is real, I live on a coastline and not a millimeter rise has been recorded in 20 years that we have been hearing things.
originally posted by: TheBulk
what happens when they're not underwater?
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Reallyfolks
Did you not read the final half of the OP? It clearly says that while those cities are effectively doomed, we CAN act to stop more cities from being doomed.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Bennyzilla
So a bunch of cities are doomed to be underwater, we need to act now to prevent more cities from going underwater, and you STILL want to wait for proof? You know doing so is going to cause more cities to go underwater right? What happens if we pass the tipping point for NYC while we are waiting for this to happen?
originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
originally posted by: Ghost147
I'm afraid that the deniers will not concede to the issue until they either drown in those cities, are forced to move, or even then may still deny.
It will be quite an interesting lifetime, regardless if such events occur or not.
I would love to know what any of that matters? Even if you convince all the civilians, (which is the target audience of those who create this scam). Why would governments target those who can't do anything about stopping this? Only governments have the power to shut down fossil fuel burning industries. Has the US attempted to stop China from burning coal?