Another One That Didn't Bite The Dust

a reply to: Grimpachi
Or so we were told! Did you see the body? Did you see a warrant? Oh the glorious face of national security!

a reply to: firerescue
Then where is an engine at Shanksville? Where is an engine at the Pentagon? Why does the US Government declare this a national security secret if they have nothing to hide? We should have the entire plane from Pentagon and Shanksville for FAA examination and available to public review if we are a free nation abiding by law

It is building 6 at the site that is quite a puzzle to me the truth about building 6 is that the building exploded and it was seen on National television and then was immediately covered up.

www.groundzeromedia.org...

a reply to: stonerwilliam

I don't see that hole in WTC6 as being very mysterious at all. It was hit by a rain of hundreds, if not thousands, of tons of steel wall sections falling from up to 1000' above it and the wall sections are visible in the video. It appears that the outer walls of WTC6 fared much better than the internal supports under such a deadly rain of debris leaving the spectacular 'hole' where the floors are smashed down to ground level.

It's clearly smashed in, not blown outward.

a reply to: jimmyx

Stranger things than that have happened in other events. On mobile just now but have you seen the picture I have posted of a bent steel beam over a timber beam after a fire .

Just because you think it can't happen doesn't mean your right.

a reply to: thegimprider

The pictures of the wreckage don't back your claim.

originally posted by: opethPA
How is what you showed in that video anyway close to what happened to the Twin Towers?

One involved a clear demolition near the base while the other involved planes slamming into the upper levels.

You cannot cure something like this ^

o my...

originally posted by: CthulhuMythos
Ooooops, so now what they gonna do?

Call 911 because they know how to do it cleaner 3 times a day.

a reply to: thegimprider

sites.google.com...

jet engine recovered at Shanksville

www.aerospaceweb.org...

Multiple shots of Jet engine parts in Pentagon

3 buildings totally prepared for demolition. They failed. Wtc7 was totally intact not stripped, not prepped. A single thermal expansion and the magic happens. Nobody can be that stupid.

a reply to: Pilgrum

Cue Bono ? Building 6 apparently exploded at 9:04 a.m i do not remember seeing hundreds of tons of steel flying about ?

Follow the money trail Besides being the Home of U.S. Customs, building 6 housed several federal departments and agencies. One agency in particular was the Export-Import bank of the United States. Destroying this building was crucial because there may have been records that would have exposed who provided the investment capital for the attacks on the United States and who would have benefitted financially from the attacks.The Building 6 connections to bank exchanges and documentation of these events prior to 9/11 are dismissed outright by the mainstream media and many other truth movements because of links that may lead us to consider that 9/11 may have been financed by Saudi Arabia or Israel.


Building 6 was also home to the El Dorado task force, an interagency money-laundering group from 55 agencies created in 1992. The El Dorado Task Force was responsible for coordinating all major money-laundering investigations in the U.S. In the immediate aftermath of9/11 attacks, these groups would coincidentally be redirected to investigate terrorist financing.

On the same day, the Securities and Exchange Commission declared a national emergency and for the first time in U.S. history invoked its emergency powers under Securities Exchange Act Section 12(k) and eased regulatory restrictions for clearing and settling security trades for the next 15 days. These changes would allow an estimated $240 billion in covert government securities to be cleared upon maturity without the standard regulatory controls around identification of ownership

As the Gold was being removed Firefighters and FEMA incident workers were told not to enter the restricted areas or face lethal force.

a reply to: stonerwilliam
The cut pattern is clearly seen here, the only explanation other than explosives would be a large meteor the shape of the cut and it's impact would have left a crater bigger than all ground zero.

a reply to: thegimprider

Or somebody with a cutting torch.

a reply to: stonerwilliam

9:04 when flight 175 hit WTC2?

All I could find about it indicates the building being essentially intact with no crater until after both tower collapses. Aerial pics indicate the roof caved in due to damage from falling heavy debris which is lying all around and inside the 'crater'

Perhaps you could guide me to reliable information indicating otherwise?

a reply to: Pilgrum

What I find ironic is that Barry Jennings, who the Conspiracy people repeatedly quote, said himself that as he attempted to escape WTC7 he discovered half the building was gone.

So either they're saying we should only listen to those specific parts of Barry Jennings' testimony that happens to agree with what they're saying...but no farther...or Barry Jennings himself is a sinister secret agent planting false information about the WTC 7 being severely damaged...but we can believe the OTHER parts that hint of conspiracy without question.

This "approach" to investigating seems more like a faith based argument to me. One must automatically assume something is correct first and then piece together whatever information is available even if it happens to contradict itself.

a reply to: GoodOlDave

One must automatically assume something is correct first and then piece together whatever information is available even if it happens to contradict itself.

But it works in Washington.

a reply to: GoodOlDave
Investigation vs explanation
Both 911 report and Warren report clearly fall into the latter category. Add all the promotions top people responsible for zero response received, we have a 1984 tongue twister of info tweek.

originally posted by: thegimprider
a reply to: GoodOlDave
Investigation vs explanation
Both 911 report and Warren report clearly fall into the latter category. Add all the promotions top people responsible for zero response received, we have a 1984 tongue twister of info tweek.

Ok. We'll go with your hypothesis. Massive cover up and loads of clear evidence of this. So how many people need to be involved? How many people prepped the buildings to fall? How many people worked on the planes? How many people made and fired the missile? How many people were planners and administration staff? How many people do you reckon in total were involved? That's only on the military side. How many people needed to be involved in the public side so the buildings could be prepped and areas cleared? The financial guys who were then responsible for moving the money about? The people shifting the gold?

I'd say you're looking at quite a decent number. If you reckon that every single person involved was involved and managed to keep a secret this long you are off your rocker. The problem with this conspiracy angle is that the slightest bit of logical thought and it falls apart. Humans can't keep secrets in a large conspiracy. Just doesn't happen. Wiki leaks and prisme has shown you that.

Also. Why? Why go to such extraordinary lengths to do something which a couple of massive truck bomb could have accomplished? Why involve 4 planes when all you were doing was robbing a bank?

really great post is this..
www.vivoipl2016.com...

www.vivoipl2016.com...

www.vivoipl2016.com...

www.vivoipl2016.com...