Ufo depictions throughout history

originally posted by: Telepathy3

Sure, but you can't either say "ooo that's symbolic" and that's it's not a ufo even tho that's exactly what it is.

No, that's exactly what it's not. Seriously, read the links start to finish that were posted earlier. You'll learn a lot.

The ones with the straight beam of light I find very interesting.
I have seen "strange lights in the sky."
I have been zapped straight in the retina with beams of light.
I do not have any great message from god to spread.
Have you ever had an eye exam where they dilate your eyes and shine a bright light into your eye where you can actually see the inside of your eyeball?
It was like that.
It was like a pink laser beam that sounded like bacon frying.
Only lasted for a second or two, but it felt like it downloaded the entire contents of my brain.

a reply to: Telepathy3

Yes because ALL artists paint EXACTLY what they see don't they



Some great examples below.

Dali Paintings

a reply to: Telepathy3


Yep. If we open our minds and take into account the tall beings that have been reported (Not saying I believe) then we could make the connection.

As for inter-dimensional beings... Well I don't know too much about all that.

originally posted by: Bedlam

originally posted by: Telepathy3

Sure, but you can't either say "ooo that's symbolic" and that's it's not a ufo even tho that's exactly what it is.

No, that's exactly what it's not. Seriously, read the links start to finish that were posted earlier. You'll learn a lot.

I already know. And like I've already said, interpretations of angels could just be what are ufos or extraterrestrials, that's angels and aliens are the same thing and thats why a ufo or angel would be depicted. There's no "debunking" this. The angels and ufos their showing could be the same thing, that angels are ufos and ufos are angels. Again, like I've already said the ufo depiction of what they called a "flaming shield" is of a ufo, it has nothing to do with angels or symbolic imagery, it's a depiction of an object that was sighted over a battle field

a reply to: wmd_2008


There's a UFO in there somewhere! lol

originally posted by: wmd_2008
a reply to: Telepathy3

Yes because ALL artists paint EXACTLY what they see don't they

Some great examples below.

Dali Paintings

Whatever gods may exist, blessed be Picasso and Dali. They made some good stuff.

a reply to: brace22

Lol, I mention peoples belief of some aliens being inter dimensional because, for example, when their crafts go invisible they seem to not just go invisible but to disappear, meaning they aren't there anymore, that they moved into a different "dimension". This would maybe explain why ufos go off of radar because when they "blink out", they aren't psychical anymore so the radar has nothing to bounce off of

a reply to: Telepathy3

Fair point. I struggle with dimensional travel and whether other dimensions exist, because at my noob level of knowledge on it, I am still struggling with the science behind it. I am still open for it to exist, I need to understand it first though.

Maybe my bank balance is inter-dimensional then! Would explain a lot actually.

a reply to: Telepathy3

Fair point. I struggle with dimensional travel and whether other dimensions exist, because at my noob level of knowledge on it, I am still struggling with the science behind it. I am still open for it to exist, I need to understand it first though.

Maybe my bank balance is inter-dimensional then! Would explain a lot actually.

a reply to: wmd_2008

Is that suppose to be evidence? Where talking about depiction of angels and crafts and wether or not the ufos and angels where seen as the same thing. Your picture of some distorted face is imaginative, but where talking about depictions of actual objects that were seen in the sky over battle fields

a reply to: Telepathy3

The Flaming Shields look more like a Comet to me and Annales Laurissenses covers the years AD 703-803 and Comet Halley made an appearance between those dates.

originally posted by: Telepathy3
a reply to: wmd_2008

Is that suppose to be evidence? Where talking about depiction of angels and crafts and wether or not the ufos and angels where seen as the same thing. Your picture of some distorted face is imaginative, but where talking about depictions of actual objects that were seen in the sky over battle fields

No what it shows is that HUMANS have an imagination and a capacity to use it .

a reply to: wmd_2008

That wouldn't account for something sitting in the sky for extended periods of time, or any of the other ufo sighting less then a few hundred years ago before we had aircrafts. HUman imagination has nothing to do with real and actual sightings of objects in the sky

originally posted by: Telepathy3
a reply to: wmd_2008

That wouldn't account for something sitting in the sky for extended periods of time, or any of the other ufo sighting less then a few hundred years ago before we had aircrafts. HUman imagination has nothing to do with real and actual sightings of objects in the sky

Can YOU prove every account was documented by the actual eye witness and is 100% accurate I will answer NO!

We see the problem often enough on here when people think every video & every picture of a dot of light at night is AUTOMATICALLY Mog from Zog on a day trip to Earth.

I mean the Chinese thought that a Solar Eclipse was a dragon eating the Sun do YOU think that

a reply to: wmd_2008

I don't claim everything is, but thats not an argument to discount real sightings of crafts before aircrafts came and it doesn't discount any actual sightings before then

originally posted by: Telepathy3
a reply to: uncommitted

And I could easily argue that the so called angels shinning lights down on them are in fact aliens, that aliens and angels are the same thing and that's why a ufo would be depicted. As I also mentioned the painted above of "flaming shields" isn't one of symbolic imagery, it's of an object that was seen over a battle field

You can't easily argue that - well, you can but it's a failed argument. You have to remember, the artist isn't painting an eye witness picture - he's depicting a scene from biblical text using the style of the day - anything you add over and above that is nothing - absolutely nothing - but your own comprehension.

a reply to: uncommitted

No, I've said several times in this post already that the ufo depiction of what they called a "flaming shield" IS an eye witness depiction of an object that was sighted over a battle field and isn't biblical or symbolic imagery

Where's Robert Langdon when you need him?

originally posted by: Telepathy3
a reply to: uncommitted

No, I've said several times in this post already that the ufo depiction of what they called a "flaming shield" IS an eye witness depiction of an object that was sighted over a battle field and isn't biblical or symbolic imagery

These images of two crusaders date from a 12th century manuscript “Annales Laurissense”, and refer to a Ufo sighting in the year 776 A.D. during the siege on Sigiburg Castle, France, by the Saxons. Suddenly a group of discs (flaming shields) appeared and started hovering over the top of the church. The Saxons believed the French were protected by these objects and fled.”

So the manuscript is MANY MANY years after the event.

To add (in bold)

The oldest manuscript known today which contains a copy of the Annales Laurissenses is known as the Lorsch Codex. This is where the Annales Laurissenses took their name, monasterium Laureshamense being the Latin name of the Lorsch monastery. The Lorsch Codex is indeed dated from the 12th century and is most probably the one referred to when talking about the provenance of the above illustrations. [...] Unfortunately, even if the Lorsch Codex does contain some miniatures for initials, it does not contain our beautiful world-wide-web illustrations. These must have come from elsewhere.

So YOUR illustrations DON'T actually appear in the original and to add insult to injury read this

So, yes, there is a chronicle which describes glowing shields in the sky, but there is no illuminated copy of it that has images that even remotely look like those.

Read and look at the illustrations HERE