World flood, did it happen, can it happen again?

a reply to: andy06shake

Can a pole shift bring the price of jet skis down? That's a more important question for those of us who live mere feet above sea-level : )

a reply to: markosity1973

I would tend to agree. We know that there were many (relatively) small floods in various places towards the end of the last ice age. It would seem that over time, the memories and stories of one or more such floods morphed into the myths of an impossible global flood that we have today.

a reply to: Kandinsky

Could always build city's that float on the surface, technology has been there since the inception of floatable concrete. Population numbers would somewhat have to be reduced, monitored and maintained for them to be in anyway sustainable but i imagine thats part of TBTB plan anyway.

originally posted by: flanimal4114
There is many accounts in many cultures of global floods, I'm wondering if this comes from truth? Or scientific proven truth that is.

What if there was a sheet of water in our atmosphere long ago that help stabilise the dinosaurs environment?? Then if solar activity causes this to fall to earth. This would prove the global flood accounts and give an other explanation of dinosaur extinction.

Please tell me what you think on the matter and how this could have happened, or extras in it.

there is linguistic evidence in the original MSs that there were two floods recorded in the bible. The Noah flood that everyone is familiar with was probably just a regional flood. but obscured in the texts is another flood and that flood took place way back in epochal time and was global. It is referred to as the Katabol. and it happened *Between line one and two of the genesis creation narrative. evidence is through out the bible but does not really stand out to a causal reading in english. if you look at line two there is a translation error vs the original language texts. a single word that changes the meaning the first three lines of the narrative. on top of that there is additional supporting evidence in other places in the bible such as isaiah, peter, revelation to name a few. noah's flood's purpose did not require a world flood. the language is ambigous because some of the words have multiple meanings. the one the editors chose appears to be off. The passage become unbelievable if you use the word choice the editors used. the bible cannot contradict physics and geological records. if you select another meaning from the possibilities available for the word translated as "world" in the noah flood narrative the noah flood does not contradict science at all. problem solved. plus there is evidence of a regional flood in that area at that time in earth's history.

Read Graham Hancock's new book, Magicians Of The Gods. All the answers are there.

nobody has even hinted at the possibility that both Earths global Flood (later incorporated into the Gilgamesh & Noah myths) and the Mars deluge were both realtime real, one-time events... but did not happen in the recent pre-history period following the end of this last ice-age.

Mars has one side of the Planet with signs of a great, catastrophic deluge by water, then a whole planet surface showing the effects of pools/lakes/rivers/oceans, as the water found its levels

the Earth global flood was more a continuous rain for a whole year as the planet collected the H2O floating between Mars & Venus

the single explanation for both worlds' getting inundated with water resides in the myth that our present asteroid belt was once a water-world planet (Vulcan) which exploded and the water from that exploded-planet-hypothesis washed away one hemisphere of Mars and the rest of the water fell towards the Sun and inner solar system causing a year long rain as the Earth passed through the cloud of water-ice crystals in Its normal orbit....

the Earth water level before that year long rainstorm/flood nay have filled the Atlantic ocean basin but the water collected from space would fill the Indian/Pacific/Antarctic Oceans & Bering & Carribean Seas

science does not support this as history but only as a fictional account
but science is at odds with spirituality and paganism also

My grandfather was born at the base of Mount Ararat in Turkey. The ark was on the mountain and still it. It was fully intact in 1900 and frozen in deep ice, only exposed after at least 15 years of consecutive drought. People from our town had been on it, and got into it before. Its very high up on the turkish side in a sensitive area( millitarily). There is only one explanation for how it got up there.

a reply to: visitedbythem

To be fair there are several explanations as to how it got there, if indeed it is Noahs ark, but only a few that are actually plausible.

What really gets me about this debate is that had the world been completely flooded for any length of time mankind and all the non aquatic animals and plants would have simply died out. We would not have suddenly started growing again like plants. Nobody ever thinks to question where did all the water that covered all the land go either?

World floods where the earth has no land for anyone to live off and also to stand on to keep us from drowning, would have wiped us out, yet here we are - so no! there has never been an authentic world flood, despite what biblical history would have one believe.

In fact there has been a woman scientist on the tv on several occasions who has been filmed in the ME taking earth core samples, which prove there has never been a world flood least of all there, just localised and periodic floods. These have occurred all over the world, hence they are localised accounts.

But who stretched them to encompass the world purely for sensationalism and to prove their God exists, is something its time to question and deal with.

As many people love to live near the sea and inland close to rivers/water, ancient man could not have helped to see many localised floods, tsunamis etc etc these are just normal, albeit unpleasant, actions of our planet which has switched throughout time from ice age to interglacial.

a reply to: stormbringer1701

there is linguistic evidence in the original MSs that there were two floods recorded in the bible.

If one considers the Sumerian story of "Tiamat", the watery planet that was destroyed in a ancient war, then waters above starts to become a possibility. And, it would have arrived here on earth in cycles. But more than waters would have arrived. Just try to imagine what the Remnants of a planet would look like after circling the sun in a vacuum would look like over millions of years.

Not likely.....



‘The water table is dropping all over the world’: NASA warns we’re on the path to global drought

Thanks to Geology we have seen that a world flood did not happen.

Its true that different past civilizations talked about global floods. But they were most likely local floods. Back then all they would be able to see was water all around them. If they had the means to fly in a helicopter they would be able to see that it was local. Floods happen all over the world, which is why you see flood accounts everywhere.

We know there was a big earthquake in Mexico in 1985, Japan in 2011, and Chile in 2010. That doesnt mean there was a "world earthquake".

In my view, when discussing sea levels around the globe, t's all pretty relative to the sea levels at the specific era in which you live.

I believe there have been many, many 'seasons' of humanity upon the Earth, as evidenced by the revisions of the true age of monuments like the Sphinx and the great pyramid, which it now seems existed long before the Egyptian society we read about in our history books, at a time when rain fell regularly in that area. Also the discoveries and study of sites like Gobekli Tepe and Puma Punku, and the huge connected networks of underground passages and hallways in places like China & Turkey, lend much creedence to this idea. Ten to fifteen thousand years ago, world sea levels were hundreds of feet lower. It seems pretty obvious that whatever version of culture existed at that time would build the majority of its settlements on the coastline, as that's where all the tasty animals and fish tend to hang out. So to those societies, we're living in the time of a massive global flood, and we just don't know it.

I know this isn't what you intended to imply with your original post, but when I get thinking about stuff like this, I've got big problems with the modern academically- and politically-supported scientific view, which seems to be 'the Earth has always been just the way it is now- sea levels and temperatures haven't ever been higher or lower, and any change in those things must surely be caused by our own evil behaviors.'

We are like fleas living on the back of this Earth. Granted, we're fleas that have figured out how to have some tiny effect on our environment. But if we tip the scales too far, and almost certainly even if we don't, we'll eventually be scratched off in some sort of apocalypse, and the survivors will have to go to ground. it will happen as it has happened before, not a question of if, but only when. And when mankind rises again, the sea levels at that time will not be the same.

For anyone interested, there's some really fascinating evidence in this video relating to the info above, enjoy!

Joe Rogan Experience with Randall Carlson - - -
youtu.be...

So most of what has been said comes to this: was it just a local flood, and that waters could not cover earth.
Let's start with waters couldn't cover earth: let's think about if there was a sheet of water in the atmosphere or maybe not pure water at all but something to that kind of degree. If it all fell it would cause a lot of extra weight that would cause earth quakes, and title waves that wight be so large that under water sources would lift up as the earths shape changes.

It is imposible for it to have been a local flood, if it was the account of a bird sent our would have not come back the first time.

Also I will go and say how do we know all of the animals on the ark, so how do we know they couldn't fit?

Oh and I live 100 metres from the sea in New Zealand for everyone out there to know, jet skis = important

originally posted by: flanimal4114
let's think about if there was a sheet of water in the atmosphere or maybe not pure water at all but something to that kind of degree. If it all fell it would cause a lot of extra weight that would cause earth quakes, and title waves that wight be so large that under water sources would lift up as the earths shape changes.

You got the answer for this on page 1.

Now there is the star water theory. A good explanation that a layman can understand can be seen here.

S0 Video on Super floods


I'm not saying this is true, but makes the most sense scientifically to me

a reply to: Agartha

Your pics hot, but you can be a pain... Lol

a reply to: MidKnight

Sorry can't arch vids at the moment 😢😢😢😢😢 but others will benefit.

a reply to: flanimal4114

Sorry to hear that as this video explains it way better than I can, but here is an attempt -

Basically the video makes a case for the earths magnetic field in the state of reversal, allowing for more cosmic rays to get in, making it so the oxygen can escape the normal atmosphere. and if there was a mega flare from the sun, the Hydrogen from this flare would be able to bond with the escaping oxygen, eventually bonding to 2 oxygen to create water. this would collect in the upper atmosphere until saturation then fall back to earth as precipitation.

This is only a brief summary, and I don't do it any justice. So please let S0 explain it and find a way to watch the video.

originally posted by: flanimal4114


Your pics hot, but you can be a pain... Lol

~sigh~ story of my life... lol

Seriously, pal, the H2O canopy is not possible unless you are talking about a divine intervention which is even less plausible than the canopy.

There is also no evidence of a global flood because it's also physically impossible.