It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
so most of the cost of the now 10 billion dollar complex didn't come from larry's pocket, yet he 'owns' a considerable amount of it now. it is rare to multiply an initial investment by such a factor, is it not?
a reply to: samkent
You seem to forget Larry has been paying on the original loan for 14 years. And in all those years he hasn't received any rent.
originally posted by: urasoul
afaik, it was his decision to take on the task of rebuilding the tower complex and i am not aware of him being in any way obliged to use the insurance payout to rebuild. maybe i am missing some details here (that have not been written by others here in response to me so far), but whether or not he turns out to make a profit or not on the rebuild doesn't change the fact that he apparently received a vast payout against a relatively small initial investment, shortly before 911. he then chose to use that money to rebuild, to attempt to make further profit.
i am not saying he is guilty due to what evidence is available, i am simply saying that among the wide variety of evidence relating to 911 that shows the presence of denial and numerous obviously highly questionable claims, lies and what appear to be coverups being put forward by those writing the 'official narrative, it is for those with conscience to monitor the situation closely and not jump to conclusions.
originally posted by: skyeagle409
There is nothing in the video that even remotely suggest a false flag operation.
Look at the governments history of false flags, operation northwoods? The government was gonna stage faked terrorist attacks on their own people and say it was Cuban "terrorists" in order to invade a country in their effort for never ending wars around the world. The 911 attacks that two thousand architects and engineers saying couldn't have happened without being a demolition sure were pretty convenient for the people who made billions from oil by the attack happening, pretty convenient for someone guy who took an insurgence policy in the building month before with his own money and then made a few billion dollars from itedit on 27-9-2015 by Telepathy3 because: (no reason given)edit on 27-9-2015 by Telepathy3 because: (no reason given)
Look at the governments history of false flags, operation northwoods?
The 911 attacks that two thousand architects and engineers saying couldn't have happened without being a demolition...
Architects and Engineers
123,000 members of ASCE(American Society of Civil Engineers) who do not question the NIST Report. There are also 80,000 members of AIA(American Institute of Architects) who do not question the NIST Report.
120,000 members of ASME(American Society of Mechanical Engineers) who do not question the NIST report. There are also 370,000 members of IEEE(Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers) who do not question the NIST report. There are also 40,000 members of AIChE(American Institute of Chemical Engineers) who do not question the NIST Report. There are also 35,000 members of AIAA (American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics) who do not question the NIST report.
911-engineers.blogspot.com...
... sure were pretty convenient for the people who made billions from oil by the attack happening, pretty convenient for someone guy who took an insurgence policy in the building month before with his own money and then made a few billion dollars from it