It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: grainofsand
No need to blaspheme, although as you know I don't believe in any spiritual things! lol
You made a point of hiding your opinion regarding the definition of 'hate crimes' and I wondered what you were doing here if you had no interest in sharing your opinion.
And your reply answered nothing,
why should it be a hate crime to beat up someone because of their skin colour but not a hate crime if you beat them up for being an immigrant or say a homeless beggar?
I am neither defending or criticizing the existence of hate crime legislation.
originally posted by: grainofsand
a reply to: whyamIhere
Lol, are you making the case that some beatings are not inspired by hate then?
You know, not defending oneself, beating them in an attack, that a position of love or hate?
Come on, you're being a silly billy now.
Retribution is the public manifestation of hate though, don't you think?
originally posted by: woodwardjnr
I got smacked round the back of the head from behind once by some guy, not because he hated me, but because I told his girlfriend who was also a Friend of mine from school, that he cheated behind her back. It wasn't a hate crime, just an idiot wanting to prove he was a tough guy and a bit of revenge. He didn't hate me just felt the need for retribution
I agree.
originally posted by: woodwardjnr
a reply to: grainofsand I think the motive behind the beating is important.
No it wouldn't in current law.
originally posted by: woodwardjnr
You'd best ask a judge, but if the motivation was because you were Welsh and the offender was a known well hater, then maybe it was a hate crime.