Smithsonian destroying more evidence of alternate human evolution?

originally posted by: Murgatroid

originally posted by: Marduk
btw, you do realise that the OP which you are supporting with your conspiracy theory has been proven completely fake right ?

Let me guess, Snopes?

no, the fact that the court case against the Smithsonian didn't happen and the group who took the Smithsonian to court doesn't exist

They were referred to in ancient times as the Brotherhood of the Snake, AKA the Brotherhood of the Dragon...

Ah right, so you can link me to an "ancient" source on the "Brotherhood of the Snake", or is this one of those claims where you have to read between the lines ?

oh and if you could support your argument by not linking to your own earlier posts that'd be great

a reply to: Murgatroid

no - not snopes - why are you obsessed with snopes ??????????????

as i asked you earier :

any evidence for the existance of the group cited in the OP article

American Institution of Alternative Archeology

They tryed to do this with old egyption stuff.
but that failed.
becuse it pre dated the bible.
seems this one is failing to.

a reply to: spookysully

Its from the world news daily. That might let us think its not very reliable. This is a satire publication. Also the 900 page report is not available for download. The link is messed up. It doesnt look like it is linked to the Smithsonian archives.

This is available at the Smithsonian archive:

Samuel Foster Haven's "Archaeology of the United States," a comprehensive survey of American anthropology to-date prepared "by special request of the [Smithsonian] Institution," is published in volume 8 of Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge. First Smithsonian Secretary Joseph Henry sees this survey as an important synthesis of work that had been done in this area, and ensures that it is free of speculation regarding the widely-held theory that a distinct race of mound-builders, separate from North American Indians, had once existed.

siarchives.si.edu...

This was published in 1856. I didnt see anything else. Basically if they are being investigated they arent going to have the information readily available for download. I have no idea where the source of this all got his information.

I do think there was an ancient race of humans before written history.


EDIT TO ADD:
There is this, a more recent publication. Prehistoric Ohio Mounds & Earthworks
Date: 1962

siarchives.si.edu...

originally posted by: tadaman
a reply to: spookysully


I do think there was an ancient race of humans before written history.

Take your pick
en.wikipedia.org...
en.wikipedia.org...
en.wikipedia.org...
en.wikipedia.org...
en.wikipedia.org...
en.wikipedia.org...
en.wikipedia.org...
en.wikipedia.org...
en.wikipedia.org...
en.wikipedia.org...
en.wikipedia.org...
en.wikipedia.org...

Although you can probably ignore that last one from the possible giants category

originally posted by: SLAYER69
a reply to: spookysully

Smithsonian Admits to Destruction of Thousands of Giant Human Skeletons in Early 1900s

The supposed "Giants" often found in the ancient native mounds in the US where supposedly the Smithsonian carted off for examination were never heard from again.....


Sorta like an archaeological Jimmy Hoffa syndrome.

I don't believe in the skeleton things. Any scientist would give their souls for evidence like that, discovering that there were gians before would make the dude Eistein from his field.

originally posted by: Murgatroid

originally posted by: Marduk
Your earlier source is so credible that its using well known photoshopped pictures as evidence

www.snopes.com...

Two words: George Soros...

Three words: refute Snope's article.

Harte

originally posted by: Marduk
oh and if you could support your argument by not linking to your own earlier posts that'd be great

My bad, I forgot you prefer CNN and Snopes...

originally posted by: SLAYER69

originally posted by: Marduk
The famous puppet of Miss Piggy was allegedly sexually assaulted by star comedian turned sexual predator, Bill Cosby,

Well, she did get around.

I'm sure Kermitt has a few interesting stories to tell.

I think she gave Kermitt a social disease. What that all about?

originally posted by: Nickn3
I think she gave Kermitt a social disease. What that all about?

You got it backwards. Kermit gave her genital warts.

Harte

a reply to: SLAYER69

It's not easy getting 'greened'!

a reply to: spookysully

What ? There is Still Some Left ? I thought they had it All Covered for the Last 100 Years now..........

originally posted by: Murgatroid

originally posted by: Marduk
oh and if you could support your argument by not linking to your own earlier posts that'd be great

My bad, I forgot you prefer CNN and Snopes...

neither of which you have debunked and no, I don't like your circular reasoning.

please add further comment to the following LOL thread:

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Thread closed.