It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: xuenchen
This just won't go away.
Now we find out the Judge that "blocked" those Planned Parenthood videos is a BIG Obama supporter !!!
Politics is everything as they say.
Hmmm.
Guess the outfit knew what judge network to make contact with. Winky Winky was in play.
Surprise Surprise !
Judge who blocked Planned Parenthood videos RAISED $230,000 for OBAMA
Well damn it looks like the fix is in. The good people at the Federalist found out that the judge who has blocked footage from being released in the fourth Planned Parenthood is not only an Obama appointee, but he raised a whole lotta money for his campaign:
Judge William H. Orrick, III, granted the injunction just hours after the order was requested by the National Abortion Federation.
Orrick was nominated to his position by hardline abortion supporter President Barack Obama. He was also a major donor to and bundler for President Obama’s presidential campaign. He raised at least $200,000 for Obama and donated $30,800 to committees supporting him, according to Public Citizen.
You think maybe Judge Billy might be slightly biased towards the left? Sounds mighty suspicious to me.
AND ...
1960's thinking at PP..
BOMBSHELL Planned Parenthood Brochure: “Abortion kills the life of a baby…”
“An abortion kills the life of a baby after it has begun. It is dangerous to your life and health. It may make you sterile so that when you want a child you cannot have it. Birth control merely postpones the beginning of life.”
originally posted by: Benevolent Heretic
Who would be impartial? A judge is in the business of being impartial.
originally posted by: Benevolent Heretic
originally posted by: xuenchen
So he campaigns and raises money for Obama, and he is impartial?
Who would be impartial?
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Benevolent Heretic
originally posted by: xuenchen
So he campaigns and raises money for Obama, and he is impartial?
Who would be impartial?
Why a Republican of course! Siwwy Heretic!
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: xuenchen
The "judge" should have recused himself in the interests of justice.
He had prior and personal knowledge.
So, in any ruling right-wingers don't agree with, the judge should have recused themselves.
Think about what you're saying.
originally posted by: neo96
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: xuenchen
The "judge" should have recused himself in the interests of justice.
He had prior and personal knowledge.
So, in any ruling right-wingers don't agree with, the judge should have recused themselves.
Think about what you're saying.
Using the judicial system to crush FREEDOM of SPEECH is RIGHT WING.
I really wish people would use the term correctly.
originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: Gryphon66
Right-wingers want to crush freedom of speech???
That is what their critics have been saying for years.
As the op says a judge blocked PP videos pretty much shows just how hot for 'freedoms' PP defenders are.