It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: crazyewok
originally posted by: UnBreakable
originally posted by: 3danimator2014
And as usual you guys will bury your heads in the sand and deny that the US has a massive gun problme.
Very sad.
Problem is not one of those poor victims was carrying because a church is supposed to be a safe haven. If someone had a CCW permit, they could've have nipped the situation in the bud before nine people were shot and killed. Yes, that is a massive gun problem where only the crazies are the ones shooting people.
Or the one with CcW could have been shot first before he/she realised.
Not a fan of strict gun control but let's be real guns are not a magic fix all solution.
originally posted by: crazyewok
Not sure how it works in US courts but the above planning iliminates insanity in UK.
originally posted by: Stormdancer777
And he does have that dead look in his eyes.
originally posted by: DelMarvel
The bodies are still warm and people are talking about Manchurian candidates and handlers. Alex Jones already has something up insinuating this is a false flag involving Soros using the facebook page as evidence.
It's pretty disgusting .
originally posted by: Silcone Synapse
originally posted by: crazyewok
Not sure how it works in US courts but the above planning iliminates insanity in UK.
Now,I know that is how the law sees it in the UK,but I ask myself-
Can a crazy personNOT plan something in advance?
And the answer I come up with is:
"Yes-IMO a crazy person can premeditate."
Sources-any serial killer/dictator/animal abuser/necrophiliac.
Of course they think about their actions prior to the event.
But that surely does not mean they are not whack jobbie crazy.
Premeditation does not equal sanity whatever the law says.
Thats my theory.
originally posted by: Shamrock6
a reply to: AmericanZombie
Theorizing is one thing, because in and of itself it utilizes facts to form an idea.
I think the point the poster was making was that "wild speculation with no basis in fact is stupid." Which I agree with.
People are already talking about this being a hoax (check the LOL bin). That's absurd and disgusting and does a complete disservice to the conspiracy theorist realm.
originally posted by: game over man
I don't understand the devil's advocate perspective for hoping this is not prosecuted as a hate crime and having the media spin it.