9 dead in shooting at South Carolina church Senator Clementa Pinckney killed

originally posted by: LDragonFire
a reply to: Sremmos80

Its on CNNs website but not the main story and I'm seeing CNN Twitter posts nothing from FOX news at all so far....Someone said MSNBC is reporting on it now.

They were all waiting under orders until the "official story" has been formulated for this obvious psych op that is all part of the plan.

This just stinks of a false flag to me.

originally posted by: real_one

originally posted by: Shamrock6
a reply to: real_one

You said, specifically, the media is using "this event."

The question stands.

I did not see any valid question pertaining to anything I actually said, please elaborate on the question which "stands" and I will do my best to riddle you that at least.

Then scroll up and read it again. You said "this event." I asked questions in regard to your statement pertaining to this event.

a reply to: FinalCountdown

So when the media jumps the gun and misreports everything (as was the case for Sandy Hook), that is evidence of psy-op. But when the media actually holds OFF for once and waits to get the story straight, that is ALSO evidence for a psy-op. Good to know.

originally posted by: Shamrock6

originally posted by: real_one

originally posted by: Shamrock6
a reply to: real_one

You said, specifically, the media is using "this event."

The question stands.

I did not see any valid question pertaining to anything I actually said, please elaborate on the question which "stands" and I will do my best to riddle you that at least.

Then scroll up and read it again. You said "this event." I asked questions in regard to your statement pertaining to this event.

See, you are doing it again. Deflecting and running away when presented with facts and logic and refusing to answer (I called you out on this previously in another thread).

Honestly, nowhere in your loaded reply could I find anything pertaining to what I actually typed. In the chance I made an error and missed it, I kindly asked you to elaborate on the "question which still stands" but yet you refuse to answer but yet still demand an answer from me on a question that I am unaware of.

I am regretting offering you the courtesy of a clarification, especially after you ran way in the other thread and are pulling the same crap in this thread.

At the very least, copy and paste the question and explain how it pertains to anything I typed, all I see you doing right now is spinning out of control and my replies to you are causing thread drift. Please get to the point and clarify or let the people who want to discuss the topic do so.

Thanks.

the shooter must be captured alive and interrogated using psychiatric tools to determine what controlled him. unfortunately the police will likely be issued shot to kill orders...
a reply to: alienjuggalo

a reply to: alienjuggalo

I almost fell off my chair when I saw what shooter looks like. He seems to look like me with 20 years less.
And I also drive a black car atm ... what brand/model is this one exactly ? The registration number could be used to hunt him, as there don't seems to be that many digits.

Prayers to the victims.

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: FinalCountdown

So when the media jumps the gun and misreports everything (as was the case for Sandy Hook), that is evidence of psy-op. But when the media actually holds OFF for once and waits to get the story straight, that is ALSO evidence for a psy-op. Good to know.

I was going to write something like that, could not have written it better
If I could give you 100 stars I´d do, just so your post does not get overread.

This is horrible.

But, sadly, not surprising at all. There is so much hate on line....untethered, off the hook vile spewings regarding wedge issues like race, religion, sexuality.

The system wants us at each other's thoats.

I sincerely hope Charleston comes together and rises above what is essentially an act of epic trolling to light the world on fire. Don't take the bait people.

a reply to: real_one

Lol oh my god your ability to spin is utterly impressive.

It's pretty simple: you said the media is using THIS to divide people.

I asked how, as it pertains to this event.

And instead of answering it, you give a smarmy answer and then go on the offensive to accuse me of deflecting. Instead of answering the question.

Get a new schtick man. That one is tired.

I haven't read the whole thread but it seems that there is really not much to go on at this point?

a reply to: NavyDoc

You've been around a while. When has that ever stopped anybody?

C'mon, doc.

Nine people were shot dead In a church by a white man. That is fact.

The rest is hearsay or speculation, and speculating is not going to do anyone any favors. I'll bet my last dollar that somebody has already cooked up a conspiracy theory despite the limited amount of info released.

This is a tragedy, and should be treated as such until more details emerge. I expect a dozen threads on this tragedy have been started by the end of this sentence.

originally posted by: Shamrock6
a reply to: real_one

Lol oh my god your ability to spin is utterly impressive.

It's pretty simple: you said the media is using THIS to divide people.

I asked how, as it pertains to this event.

And instead of answering it, you give a smarmy answer and then go on the offensive to accuse me of deflecting. Instead of answering the question.

Get a new schtick man. That one is tired.

These media outlets are using this story to fuel an already volatile situation without having all the facts first. That is how they are helping cause a deeper divide among the people. Does that pertain enough for you?

I assure you my intention is not to spin as you have implied, what I am trying to do is get a clear answer from you (which is like pulling teeth), and it looks like this quote above is as close to that I am going to get so please let me clarify.

As of now, we have not much to go on. Other than the obvious facts. The obvious facts (as we have been tol by the media at least, which means the facts are not that obvious) is that a white man has gone into a black church and killed 9 black people.

Media automatically says hate crime due to race. Even though it is a logical assumption it is too soon to be presenting this as near fact. The general public is gullible and will let the media make their mind up for them.

For all we know he was after the politician for something they did which he did not agree with, no one knows for sure, yet the media has to put it out as a black vs white, which will not help today's current atmosphere.

Another possibility is a relationship gone bad? Could be anything.

Media divides people, are you not aware that media outlets are not true journalism and they peddle what they are told. There is an obvious agenda at play here, not just today's event, but over the last few years the race issue has certainly heated up.

I am not saying all these events were false flags, but whether they were staged or not, the media sure did a fine job at putting out sensational stories void of fact but they sure were full of assumptions and misinformation. People say this is all routine as they "scramble to get the story out" but I believe there is more to it than this. These contradictions by the media are intentional, to keep the public confused and misinformed.

If you don't think that the media is in cahoots with the government in regards to the current racial tension in the United States then I have some ocean front property in Nebraska to sell you.

This might have been an attack on religion.

They needed a diversion to get the TPA passed today.

a reply to: real_one

Have you actually physically watched any MSM reports on this story?

Because I've been watching CNN for the last few hours and there not spinning anything, there simply reporting what the police are stating. "Hate crime" is not even the MSM phrase, it's the police who have called it that. In fact, CNN have had several debates about whether that's a correct phrase.

Anyway, what the police have released.

1. The shooter told one of the victims he was letting her live so she could tell people what happened.
2. The shooter made hateful statements well open firing.

It quite clearly sounds like both a hate crime and domestic terrorism to me.

Prayers and my compassion to the families and the victims.

Shame on people already pushing there agenda.

originally posted by: xuenchen
This might have been an attack on religion.

This is true, could be. But since this happened in an AME (African Methodist Episcopal) church, the first conclusion people will jump to is racial.

originally posted by: Shamrock6
a reply to: NavyDoc

You've been around a while. When has that ever stopped anybody?

C'mon, doc.

LOL.

Local law enforcement has issued a BOLO for a 2000 Honda Elantra, dark in color, SC registration of LGF330; driven by a approximately 21 years old white male, 5'9", 120 pounds.

They said Honda, but they may have meant Hyundai, IDK.

SC Highway patrol is stating the license is LGP330. I guess its total confusion right now to get clear info out...