It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: ParasuvO
Rather than point out that several crewed spacecraft are being developed by the United States, and that China shows every sign of further developing its spacefaring capacity, I'll give in and ask: why do you say that? (Already hearing the steady march of Aliens approaching.)
originally posted by: intrptr
The US shuttle program was the most ambitious, expensive, complex over engineered return vessel ever.
I expect the Russians figured this out before their copy even got off the ground.
I think, the Russians wanted to show that they were capable of doing the things that the US could.
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: buddah6
I think, the Russians wanted to show that they were capable of doing the things that the US could.
The space race?
Te Russians were the first to put something in orbit, a man in orbit, a woman, first to hit the moon with a lander, etc.
Personally I think they wanted to analyze the US space program, go so far as "mocking it" (the shuttle copy) and when done, abandoned it for their return system, which is still in operation today.
Not everyone wants to "be like Mike".
ETA: Defending against expansionist America is more like it.
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: buddah6
What did they discover about the Buran program that warranted program cancellation?
Cost.
Much harder to shoot a glider to space that can land on runways than to just return a slug that hits the ground.
Obviously.
originally posted by: buddah6
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: ParasuvO
Rather than point out that several crewed spacecraft are being developed by the United States, and that China shows every sign of further developing its spacefaring capacity, I'll give in and ask: why do you say that? (Already hearing the steady march of Aliens approaching.)
They are going to have to steal some more from the US and Russia. The sad part is when they have to do the problem solving without their thieves.
originally posted by: DJW001
originally posted by: imitator
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: RubberSky
America has a very active unmanned launch schedule lofting a wide variety of unmanned spacecraft. It is only in manned spacecraft that the US is temporarily relying on Russia.
That is true with the likes of Boeing, SpaceX and Sierra Nevada Corporation.... plus Nasa funding them. But seemingly odd that the Boeing’s CST-100 looks like an old Apollo capsule... fancy space shuttle rides is a thing of the past... in reality all one needs is a simple ride up to and back from space... funny how we got it right the first time around....
There have long been two schools of thought when it comes to spacefaring technology. Single purpose, single use design and multi-purpose reusable design. Apollo was the apotheosis of the first school of thought, the Space Shuttle the best example to date of the latter. A British firm is working on a single-stage-to-orbit craft, Skylon, that lifts off horizontally as a jet then switches to rockets in the upper atmosphere.
originally posted by: JadeStar
originally posted by: buddah6
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: ParasuvO
Rather than point out that several crewed spacecraft are being developed by the United States, and that China shows every sign of further developing its spacefaring capacity, I'll give in and ask: why do you say that? (Already hearing the steady march of Aliens approaching.)
They are going to have to steal some more from the US and Russia. The sad part is when they have to do the problem solving without their thieves.
This is kinda funny considering both the US and Russia "stole" from Germany to get it all started.