It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Plasma Tubes Floating Above Earth

page: 5
101
<< 2  3  4    6 >>

log in

join
share:
(post by Peeple removed for a manners violation)
(post by theabsolutetruth removed for a manners violation)

posted on Jun, 3 2015 @ 05:55 AM
link   
old facts.
The magnetic grid controls this.

Funny how ppl go crazy over something they can't see.



posted on Jun, 3 2015 @ 07:02 AM
link   

originally posted by: Peeple
a reply to: AdmireTheDistance

Still if it is connected to our magnetosphere, which it is for sure, we maybe shouldn't heat it, but it could be the answer to cold fusion? And I am leaning far out of the window saying this.
So just ignore, because I should probably shut up and learn more before my sci-fi fantasies run wild....


Not far off:

Space Magnetism May Hold Secret to Fusion Power



posted on Jun, 3 2015 @ 09:52 AM
link   

originally posted by: Epirus
Right...because it's impossible to theorize that they may have existed


Excuse me, the poster to which I was replying said that Tesla "knew" about these tubes, not "theorized" about these tubes. Big difference.



posted on Jun, 3 2015 @ 10:21 AM
link   

originally posted by: chr0naut

A Tokomak is a containment environment for a high energy plasma.

The LHC is a number of accelerators and sensors that collide particles and look at the remnants.

Both are significantly different than each other.

The goal of ITER is to produce a sustainable fusion reaction in a captive plasma with more energy output than input (potentially for energy generation purposes), not to probe the nature of reality as does the LHC.

Your assumption that they are the same is likely the source of your confusion.

As for CERN in these times, let the privateers pay for waving their Bosons about!



They are both containment for high energy particles.
I didn't say they were the same when the purposes are the opposite, I was talking about the containment.
My confusion, is about the huge amount of money involved, and the politics behind that again, and a lack of commonality by way of these bespoke projects, each of which could end up as dead ducks, especially ITER, with $20billion and rising which could end up down the swanee, when there are other fusion projects already ongoing like the National Ignition Facility, Inertial confinement fusion (ICF) which use lasers as a tool for fusion, and are not magnetic confinement instruments.

Al this when much of the world is in austerity economies, with little sign of it ending. It would be great if ITER worked in ten years time, but still it would be decades before something came on line. If the laser guys are ahead though?
edit on 3-6-2015 by smurfy because: Text.



posted on Jun, 3 2015 @ 10:41 AM
link   

originally posted by: AdmireTheDistance no ancient culture would have had any means of detecting this


no known ancient culture.
edit on R2015rd2015-06-03T10:42:30-05:0020150am1534 by RoScoLaz4 because: spacing



posted on Jun, 3 2015 @ 10:48 AM
link   
Brilliant!!!!



posted on Jun, 3 2015 @ 10:51 AM
link   
a reply to: Peeple

I don't understand any of this at all, but it makes the mind run wild, reading what I can on the subject isn't helping much, but what a wonderful planet,

BTW is this common throughout the known universe?



posted on Jun, 3 2015 @ 10:54 AM
link   

originally posted by: yeahsurexxx
old facts.
The magnetic grid controls this.

Funny how ppl go crazy over something they can't see.



oh



posted on Jun, 3 2015 @ 11:05 AM
link   

originally posted by: AdmireTheDistance

originally posted by: 0bserver1

originally posted by: Rosinitiate

Plasma tubes eh? Wonder what they be good for?


Maybe like a big television screen projecting things to earth that don't exist.. ?

What? No...Just no. First of all, just because the word 'plasma' is involved doesn't make this phenomenon "like a big television screen". At all. Secondly, plasma television screens don't 'project' anything. Thirdly, did you even read the linked article?

Edit: 1,000th post! Woohoo!

never mind
edit on 3-6-2015 by UnderKingsPeak because: won't go there



posted on Jun, 3 2015 @ 11:08 AM
link   
So from what I just read they are not really sure what they do?



As to what these tubes do, Ms Loi said they may have a ‘possibly significantly role to play in moderating the energies of the radiation belts’ that surround Earth.



posted on Jun, 3 2015 @ 12:31 PM
link   
a reply to: Stormdancer777

All the inhabited planets i visited so far


peace




posted on Jun, 3 2015 @ 01:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: MamaJ
a reply to: Wolfenz

I exhausted myself doing research on the Sun and how it as well as our planet are connected. The changes we see could very well be with our place in the Solar System. It's like we are moving back to where we began. .. to the beginning. Solar weather is as important as local. We will all realize that sooner than later. It will be the norm.

Oh ETA: see my signature
hope ya enjoy the read


Amen Mama J.
We are all going to get a crash course in Solar Happenings
and learn just how much that 1million mile wide sphere controls.



posted on Jun, 3 2015 @ 01:35 PM
link   

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: the2ofusr1

The same electric universe that was recently destroyed by actual observations made on an actual comet? I think not.

Awesome story, I hope they win some awards.



Except that has not happened.
In fact the observations of 67P have done quite a bit to further the EU model.
For example,

www.sciencedaily.com...


The detection of this process is consistent with the process described in the EU Electric comet model. This article of course is filled with the statements that continue to try and reconcile the observations with the standard model. The claim that H2O is present on these bodies in frozen form and sublimated by solar heating is not consistent with what has been observed. H and O are present but so are a host of other elements and compounds and they are dispersed by the electrical discharge process which forms the plums we are all familiar with.

The statement that this is similar to the process observed on Europa where they acknowledge Jupiter's magnetic field as the cause is quickly shored up with the traditional "except this is solar heating".

Keep bailing but your bucket has a hole in it.
edit on 3-6-2015 by Dragoon01 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 3 2015 @ 01:49 PM
link   
But




Seriously, what are the implications of this?



Plus, I'm just jazzed that the name Cleo is now associated with genius, as that is my grandaughters name.



posted on Jun, 3 2015 @ 01:50 PM
link   
I take it no one knows how to splain this to me?

What I did hear was nothing is seen through our eyes like it actually appears.

Ms Loi said the drifting plasma tubes could distort astronomical data, especially satellite-based navigation systems. It may also mean we need to re-evaluate our thinking about how galaxies, stars and clouds of gas behave and what they look like.
edit on 013030p://bWednesday2015 by Stormdancer777 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 3 2015 @ 04:31 PM
link   

originally posted by: smurfy

originally posted by: chr0naut

A Tokomak is a containment environment for a high energy plasma.

The LHC is a number of accelerators and sensors that collide particles and look at the remnants.

Both are significantly different than each other.

The goal of ITER is to produce a sustainable fusion reaction in a captive plasma with more energy output than input (potentially for energy generation purposes), not to probe the nature of reality as does the LHC.

Your assumption that they are the same is likely the source of your confusion.

As for CERN in these times, let the privateers pay for waving their Bosons about!



They are both containment for high energy particles.
I didn't say they were the same when the purposes are the opposite, I was talking about the containment.
My confusion, is about the huge amount of money involved, and the politics behind that again, and a lack of commonality by way of these bespoke projects, each of which could end up as dead ducks, especially ITER, with $20billion and rising which could end up down the swanee, when there are other fusion projects already ongoing like the National Ignition Facility, Inertial confinement fusion (ICF) which use lasers as a tool for fusion, and are not magnetic confinement instruments.

Al this when much of the world is in austerity economies, with little sign of it ending. It would be great if ITER worked in ten years time, but still it would be decades before something came on line. If the laser guys are ahead though?


We live in a technological world. The products we use today are pushing at the edges of what we can achieve physically. To advance from here, we are going to REQUIRE breakthroughs in our scientific understandings. If we stop here,we simply progress no further. Similarly, commercial success in many areas is entirely dependent upon new technological feature sets. Without the science, that will stop happening.

Big science relies on big investment and we need the big science because all the low budget stuff can only go so far.

The Murcheson Array spoken of in the OP article is a "big science" project, without which, this discovery would not be likely. There are also many other big science projects that will totally (without a shadow of a doubt) revolutionize our knowledge and will likely pay for themselves at some stage.


edit on 3/6/2015 by chr0naut because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 3 2015 @ 05:34 PM
link   
uh... I think I may have recorded a plasma tube using solar obliteration technique.... please tell me what you think
youtu.be...



posted on Jun, 3 2015 @ 09:56 PM
link   

originally posted by: thetruthisupthere
uh... I think I may have recorded a plasma tube using solar obliteration technique.... please tell me what you think
youtu.be...


Fragment of spiderweb floating on the breeze with the Sun beaming through it.

Not a plasma tube which is invisible (even with a "solar obliteration" technique, just like SOHO uses - but we don't see many spiderwebs in space).



new topics

top topics



 
101
<< 2  3  4    6 >>

log in

join