It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Willtell
a reply to: ManBehindTheMask
What’s the big deal, I look at this persons fixation and hear her words and determine she is crazy.
Not a way out conclusion, imo
Btw, we have all kinds of problems and all kinds of extremists
originally posted by: Shamrock6
Why is it when the FBI does something, it's suspicious and must be indicative of some nefarious plot? But if they DON'T do something, it is also suspicious and indicative of a nefarious plot? Is it just a matter of wanting to have the bases covered so no matter what, somebody is right? It seems that whatever action taken is wrong. And where there's inaction, it's also wrong. That continues to amaze me.
originally posted by: Rocker2013
....are they all idiots? Are they all "in on it"? Are they all "actors"?
originally posted by: chibistevie
Why doesn't anyone consider this lady who held this Muhammad cartoon event as an extremist? She is anti-Muslim and did something to disrespect the entire religious all because assholes which represent a small percentage of the religion spread hate and terror. That would be like hating Christianity because of what groups like Westboro Baptist church do. It encourages Islamaphobia and non extremist Muslims suffer.
Freedom of expression is often exploited to take shots at others from behind a protective veil. This lady must watch South Park because this sounds just like an episode where the Prophet Muhammad is depicted as a giant teddy bear. The show's creators Trey Parker and Matt Stone revealed on a 60 Minutes interview that they received death threats after making that episode.
originally posted by: Noobarino
Here is an interview with Peter Powers that details how his Anti-terrorist units
It encourages Islamaphobia and non extremist Muslims suffer.
originally posted by: Bilk22
That's all fine and good, but the cop is a public servant and his identity should be known. If indeed the law allows for his name to be withheld, then we know why this idiotic event was STAGED in Texas.
originally posted by: ManBehindTheMask
originally posted by: Bilk22
This is true even when said officer guns down an American citizen?
originally posted by: Shamrock6
a reply to: Bilk22
Is it? Turns out in Texas, a police department can't release an officer's picture unless they've been charged with a crime, named in a civil suit, or the officer consents to it. They also can't release personnel files or information without the state AG office signing off on it.
Brah. Lulz.
I guess the citizen shouldnt have drawn down on the officer........thats a pretty quick way to get shot here in Texas, and not just by officers
originally posted by: ketsuko
originally posted by: chrismarco
a reply to: Willtell
I'm putting Pam Gellar right up there whith Nancy Pelosi...two annoying people...Who seriously didn't think something was not going to happen either buy alleged terrorists or some lunatics...I don't like people dumping on religion in general regardless how fantastic it may sound...it's just respect and free speech is one of those dodgy rights that can be expoited by attention seekers to be a douche under the guise of freedom and free speech...
You know what? Normally, I'd agree with you, but I'm sick and tired of this country letting Islam put our nuts in her purse. Honestly.
This country spends all its time insulting religion and telling the religious to sit down and shut up because we aren't a religious nation ... until we're talking about one specific religion and then we tip-toe all over respecting it.
And you and I both know it isn't because this country has suddenly discovered the magic of treating others with any kind of respect. It's only because they're scared. They're cowards. They know this is exactly what will happen. Oh, that and they'll lose Muslims as their fellow travelers for the time being.