It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Multiple advocates for the pair said they became very different in jail to the young men sentenced to death by the court.
Chan, 31, ran Bible study classes in Bali's Kerobokan jail, while Sukumaran, 33, became a keen artist.
The son of restaurant owners, and a former part-time cook, Chan also ran a cooking school in Kerobokan prison.
And he featured in a documentary seeking to educate secondary school students about the dangers of drug taking.
The film includes a six-page letter written by Chan entitled "Dear Me: The Dangers of Drugs".
In it he writes: "Dear Me, when you are older you will be in a Bali prison and you will be executed. This happened to you because you thought taking drugs was cool.... Your family and friends are heart broken... Underneath you are not a bad person."
He also addresses young people in the film.
"I have missed weddings, funerals, just the simple presence of my family. The hurt and pain that I don't just put onto myself, but my family, is agonising," he says.
"My life is a perfect example of an absolute waste. That does not have to be [the case] for you."
The director of the film, Malinda Rutter, met Chan in prison and said he was a transformed man.
"He's funny, articulate, he is charismatic and has a very caring personality," Ms Rutter told News Limited.
She said that his unhappy childhood led him into criminal activity. "He was a really troubled kid and he wanted to be tougher and bigger than the other kids," she said.
Chan tells the documentary that he got involved in drugs "at a pretty young age" and that by the time he was 15 he was "merged into the scene".
Chan's final wish was granted by Indonesian authorities the day before he died when he married his Indonesian girlfriend at the prison.
Sukumaran attended the same high school as Chan in south-west Sydney although the two men did not meet until years later.
Sukumaran's mother told News Limited that her son was also "rehabilitating" and had set up several courses in prison, including those in philosophy and art.
Painting "gives you a sense of control", the Sydney Morning Herald quoted him as saying.
"Before I got arrested, I was never really good at anything. Zero skills or hobbies, no real direction in life," he said.
"When I do a good painting, it's like you see yourself improving, you can make something that's good."
Artist Ben Quilty, who has been mentoring Sukumaran, said he was surprised by his demeanour.
"He was not this dark character out of Batman but a young, shy Australian man," he told the paper.
One of his paintings is a portrait of Joko Widodo with the words "People can change" on the back.
During a court hearing in 2010 Sukumaran said he had changed.
"From the bottom of my heart I can honestly say I am now a different person and a reformed person," he said.
The Australia Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) reported that as his last request he had asked to be allowed to paint "for as long and as much as possible".
originally posted by: Kryties
Multiple advocates for the pair said they became very different in jail to the young men sentenced to death by the court.
Bali 9 executions: What kind of country kills people this way?
When an individual plots a chilling, malodorous killing, it's called mass murder.
The only difference to what we witnessed this week, is that the culprit was the Indonesian Government, hiding like a coward behind laws that it knows it can bend with the breeze.
But it's not even this week's state-sanctioned murder that highlights the barbarism of Joko Widodo's regime; it's the tortuous, cruel way the killings were carried out, aimed at both humiliating Australia and bringing two families to their knees.
How else do you explain a regime that assassinates two young men, after they have spent 10 years rehabilitating themselves and proving they could be the pro-education weapon Indonesia needs to fight drug crime?
Why else would a government, asked by our own not to announce the pending executions on Anzac Day, proceed to do just that?
Why wouldn't authorities initially remove the hand shackles of eight prisoners who wanted one of their last acts to be the warm embrace of their families; good law-abiding parents who have already lived a decade in hell?
Can you imagine an authority acting with the spite that would be needed to threaten that two young men, sentenced to death, would be refused permission to have with them the comfort of a religious advisor in their final moments?
What kind of regime has its senior officials pose for selfies with death row prisoners, ahead of an execution?
Is there a word other than "barbaric" to describe the humiliating circus their families were placed in, with officials forcing them to walk through crowds and a world media pack to reach their sons, on their final day?
How do you describe a government which sentences to death - and then carries out that sentence - while the stench of corruption allegations continue to swirl around its judiciary?
Or which refuses to accept that the law, good sense and good government should dictate that an execution is carried out AFTER all legal and judicial avenues are ended?
How do you describe a regime - a so-called friend of Australia - who doesn't bother to return calls made by our own government, over the impending callous murder of two of its citizens? Or which appears to be behind the leak of private photographs of someone's wedding day, 24 hours before they end it in the dark of night, with a bullet?
How do you describe the hypocrisy of a country that relishes in extinguishing the life of criminals from foreign countries while complaining loudly when the same justice is handed out to its own citizens elsewhere?
When Myuran Sukumaran left Homebush Boys High School, his school reference labelled him honest, reliable, responsible, punctual and well-prepared with high standards and a good example to junior students.
He had taken part in national maths and science competitions, was a gold-medal winner in karate and played in the school's second-grade rugby team. He gave blood in the annual school appeal and was a volunteer collector for the Salvation Army's Red Shield Appeal.
Like Andrew Chan, he fell in with a bad crowd, made an absolutely atrocious decision, committed a serious crime, and ended up in an Indonesian jail.
They both belonged there, not in a field with a marksmen a few metres away, aiming a bullet at their heart.
So how do you describe a country with such little regard for life or the voice of a neighbour striving to cherish its friendship?
How about a country that should be left to sort out its own refugee problem, and its own aid problem, and one that many Australians will never set foot in again.
originally posted by: Kryties
But it's not even this week's state-sanctioned murder
aimed at both humiliating Australia and bringing two families to their knees.
Or which refuses to accept that the law, good sense and good government should dictate that an execution is carried out AFTER all legal and judicial avenues are ended?
originally posted by: Kryties
if they will admit to being compliant in sending two Australians to their deaths,
(one may ask why this was also not the case for the Chan and Sukumaran, why were they not allowed to conclude their appeals?
originally posted by: Kryties
Everything you have just said has been dealt with and shot down multiple times in this thread,
and allowed them to be put in jeopardy of execution
rather than waiting for them to return to Australia.
It is also worth noting that at NO point in time were the Indonesian in ANY DANGER from the smugglers,
[ therefore should have been dealt with by Australian Police and the Australian Courts system who would have given them a humane and fair jail sentence - rather than execution.
originally posted by: hellobruce
They never made it back to Australia, so how could the be arrested here?
How silly can you get, ever thought that the courier that delivered the convicted drug dealers their drugs also bought some in to sell in Indonesia?
originally posted by: Kryties
Now you are just being plain silly. It is obvious that had the AFP not allowed the Indonesians to capture them in Bali
that they would have made it to Melbourne to be arrested there. Please stop the nonsense and twisting of words.
No they did not, stop making things up.
Do you have anything NEW to add to MY thread,
originally posted by: hellobruce
originally posted by: Kryties
Now you are just being plain silly. It is obvious that had the AFP not allowed the Indonesians to capture them in Bali
They committed the crime of drug smuggling in Indonesia, they were caught in Indonesia - all their own fault. Why are you trying to blame others?
You are the one posting nonsense, and not wanting to blame those responsible - the drug smugglers themselves!
originally posted by: Kryties
Why are you deliberately ignoring the fact that had the AFP not alerted the Indonesians to the smugglers that they would have made it to Australia to be arrested there?
What a load of crap.
stinks of desperation on your part
originally posted by: Kryties
originally posted by: hellobruce
They never made it back to Australia, so how could the be arrested here?
Now you are just being plain silly. It is obvious that had the AFP not allowed the Indonesians to capture them in Bali that they would have made it to Melbourne to be arrested there. Please stop the nonsense and twisting of words.
How silly can you get, ever thought that the courier that delivered the convicted drug dealers their drugs also bought some in to sell in Indonesia?
No they did not, stop making things up.
originally posted by: hellobruce
Apparently some people think that drug smugglers in a country where the penalty for that is death should have no responsibility or blame put on them - it is all the fault of anybody and everybody else, no blame at all should be put on the drug smugglers. These people must be desperate to get drugs smuggled into Australia.
Then when the drug smugglers are caught and jailed, at their trial they constantly lie about having nothing at all to do with the drug smuggling, but that is fine as they are drug smugglers.
We share the world with drug smugglers and their supporters, who want no blame at all to fall on the drug smugglers, it is the fault of everyone else, no blame at all lies on the drug smugglers.
Laws mean nothing to drug smugglers and their supporters, they smuggle drugs in a country where the penalty for that is death, but when they are caught they start whining that it was all someone else's fault, the laws that they broke were not fair on drug smugglers.
We have to share the world with drug smugglers and their supporters, whose actions threaten the moral fabric of our society, destroys homes and families. One day the world will experience freedom from drug smugglers and their supporters and their dark and monstrous thinking that dealing in drugs is fine, when we evolve enough drug dealers and their supporters will be recognised and exterminated immediately upon showing themselves.