It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Arrow22
originally posted by: Entreri06
originally posted by: Arrow22
Because the Left do not see the end picture with their heads are up their butts
Says the climate denier?!??!? LOL!!!!
Global Warming is the idiotic name given to "Written End Times"
I deny Global Warming (it was supposedly warmer in other times)
I support the idea of End Times World Changes to which
Warming is only one part of it.
originally posted by: Zoyd23
I'm totally turned off by political right and left wingers, and I don't see the right wing bias at all...in fact, all the liberal antisemitism and pro-Obama chatter has kept me away for months at a time. I stay away from political forums....all propaganda these days, and when did liberals a become so damn mean? They used to be compassionate people, as I recall.
originally posted by: LOSTinAMERICA
Because the left screwed it up.
originally posted by: Zoyd23
I'm totally turned off by political right and left wingers, and I don't see the right wing bias at all...in fact, all the liberal antisemitism and pro-Obama chatter has kept me away for months at a time. I stay away from political forums....all propaganda these days, and when did liberals a become so damn mean? They used to be compassionate people, as I recall.
originally posted by: amazing
originally posted by: LOSTinAMERICA
Because the left screwed it up.
What did the left screw up? Or, perhaps more relevantly, when have the left screwed up anything worse than the right?
originally posted by: amazing
originally posted by: LOSTinAMERICA
Because the left screwed it up.
What did the left screw up? Or, perhaps more relevantly, when have the left screwed up anything worse than the right?
originally posted by: Entreri06
originally posted by: Zoyd23
I'm totally turned off by political right and left wingers, and I don't see the right wing bias at all...in fact, all the liberal antisemitism and pro-Obama chatter has kept me away for months at a time. I stay away from political forums....all propaganda these days, and when did liberals a become so damn mean? They used to be compassionate people, as I recall.
There is no way some one not affiliated looks at both sides and falls for the "Obama the messiah" stuff. Liberals don't shy away from critizizing Obama. They just go after him got real issues not fake ones, like Benghazi.
originally posted by: Zoyd23
I'm totally turned off by political right and left wingers, and I don't see the right wing bias at all...in fact, all the liberal antisemitism and pro-Obama chatter has kept me away for months at a time. I stay away from political forums....all propaganda these days, and when did liberals a become so damn mean? They used to be compassionate people, as I recall.
originally posted by: ketsuko
originally posted by: Entreri06
originally posted by: Zoyd23
I'm totally turned off by political right and left wingers, and I don't see the right wing bias at all...in fact, all the liberal antisemitism and pro-Obama chatter has kept me away for months at a time. I stay away from political forums....all propaganda these days, and when did liberals a become so damn mean? They used to be compassionate people, as I recall.
There is no way some one not affiliated looks at both sides and falls for the "Obama the messiah" stuff. Liberals don't shy away from critizizing Obama. They just go after him got real issues not fake ones, like Benghazi.
Wait. Please explain how Benghazi is a fake issue.
You had an ambassador, someone who has a rank similar to a four star general and who is symbolically like a presidential proxy in a world hot spot with only local contractors as his security? Why did he not have at least a mix of trained US military and local contractors, especially as there was a detachment of marines guarding our embassy in the Caribbean. Those marines, I would have thought, could have been assigned to Libya with local contractors working in the Caribbean.
But then, you had no attempt to secure the crime scene. Even supposing the military could not have gotten assets there in time to make any difference to the immediate outcome. There were assets who could have secured the crime scene. Instead, you have reporters and who knows who all else traipsing through the burned out facility recovering who knows what out of the ashes afterward. What security sensitive stuff went unrecovered?
Then, we were told that our people could not find the perpetrators, but of course, the media found them ... and interviewed. If they were so hard to find, why could reporters find them? Why have they not been brought to justice? I'm not talking about the guy who made that movie no one saw. He's a red herring, an excuse.
Now, 30 people were taken out of there. Where are they and what is their story? They have been under NDA probably for security reasons. But if what they have to say is so security sensitive ... then what about the stuff left at the scene that was NOT secured? Was there nothing there that was also security sensitive?
There are a lot of unanswered questions about Benghazi and these are going to be bad for Hillary because this happened on her watch. There is a lot we don't know and lot that has not been laid to rest.
But what difference does it make as far as you're concerned I guess.
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: Entreri06
Go back and read my post.
Where did I mention Obama?
originally posted by: Entreri06
Because niether Obama or Clinton, neither left or right caused it. The worst critisim that's fair is the movie story. Which isn't suprising considering they were still investigating it at that time like 48 hours later.
So what would be the reason to cover it up that would rightfully lead back to high level administration people? Obama and the election?? All the polls said the country trusted Obama over Romney on forien policy. So more terrorists would be better for Obama in the election. Not better for Romney.
It's a conspiracy theory without a conspiracy end game. The right played up all the BS "Obama let them die" garbage. Like he orcesrated the attack, because you know he's trying to desroy America... Ridiculous...
originally posted by: Guidance.Is.Internal
originally posted by: Entreri06
Because niether Obama or Clinton, neither left or right caused it. The worst critisim that's fair is the movie story. Which isn't suprising considering they were still investigating it at that time like 48 hours later.
So what would be the reason to cover it up that would rightfully lead back to high level administration people? Obama and the election?? All the polls said the country trusted Obama over Romney on forien policy. So more terrorists would be better for Obama in the election. Not better for Romney.
It's a conspiracy theory without a conspiracy end game. The right played up all the BS "Obama let them die" garbage. Like he orcesrated the attack, because you know he's trying to desroy America... Ridiculous...
Oh BS. The Obama administration played it off as a reaction to some anti-muslim preacher's videos. They were spinning the murder of an ambassador so it wouldn't reflect poorly on the administration. Despicable.
originally posted by: Guidance.Is.Internal
Oh BS. The Obama administration played it off as a reaction to some anti-muslim preacher's videos. They were spinning the murder of an ambassador so it wouldn't reflect poorly on the administration. Despicable.