Hillary Clinton: The International Neocon Warmonger

Without a doubt this coming election is the worst choice in American history for the American people.

LINK

A crazy group of GOP right-wing nuts with another sinister Bush candidate leading the way as one choice, versus literally an evil wicked “woman” as another choice…what a bargain!

Here the conspiratorial historian and writer Webster Tarpley runs down the horrible record of Hillary Clinton on foreign matters and her husbands record on free trade agreements like NAFTA that have gutted the American middle class.

As the National Journal reported in 2014, even the pathetically weak anti-war left is not ready to reconcile with Hillary given her warmongering as Secretary of State. And with good reason. Scratching just lightly beneath the surface of Hillary Clinton’s career reveals the empirical evidence of her historic support for aggressive interventions around the globe. Beginning with Africa, Hillary defended the 1998 cruise missile strike on the El Shifa pharmaceutical plant in the Sudanese capital of Khartoum, destroying the largest producer of cheap medications for treating malaria and tuberculosis and provided over 60% of available medicine in Sudan..”

This is the same leader who was murdered in the aftermath of the 2011 NATO bombing of Libya; an attack promoted and facilitated with the eager support of Mrs. Clinton. In an infamous CBS news interview, said regarding this international crime: “We came, we saw, he died.” As Time magazine pointed out in 2011, the administration understood removing Qaddafi from power would allow the terrorist cells active in Libya to run rampant in the vacuum left behind. Just last month the New York Times reported that Libya has indeed become a terrorist safe haven and failed state— conducive for exporting radicals through “ratlines” to the conflict against Assad in Syria. Hillary Clinton was indeed behind the Libyan fiasco her input in foregn policy as secretary of state.

Other than horrible policies like this she literally DID NOTHING as secretary of state!

….Accomplished not one foreign policy achievement!


At least John Kerry is trying to be real secretary of state by doing something other than going on lavish junket trips around the world as Hillary did

Hillary made prompt use of the ratlines for conflicts in the Middle East. In the summer of 2012, Clinton privately worked with then CIA director and subversive bonapartist David Petraeus on a proposal for providing arms and training to death squads to be used to topple Syria just as in Libya. This proposal was ultimately struck down by Obama, reported the New York Times in 2013, but constituted one of the earliest attempts at open military support for the Syrian death squads. Her voting record on intervening in Afghanistan and Iraq is well known and she also has consistently called for attacking Iran. She even told Fareed Zakaria the State Department was involved “behind the scenes” in Iran’s failed 2009 Green Revolution. . More recently in Foreign Policy magazine David Rothkopf wrote on the subject of the Lausanne nuclear accord, predicting a “snap-back” in policy by the winner of the 2016 election to the foreign policy in place since the 1980s. The title of this article? “Hillary Clinton is the Real Iran Snap-Back.” This makes Hillary the prime suspect for a return to the madcap Iranian policies that routinely threaten the world with a World War 3 scenario.

Hillary Clinton is not only actively aggressing against Africa and the Middle East. She was one of the loudest proponents against her husband’s hesitancy over the bombing of Kosovo, telling Lucina Frank: “I urged him to bomb,” even if it was a unilateral action. While no Clinton spokesperson responded to a request by the Washington Free Beacon regarding her stance on Ukraine, in paid speeches she mentioned “putting more financial support into the Ukrainian government”. When Crimea decided to choose the Russian Federation over Poroshenko’s proto-fascist rump state, Hillary anachronistically called President Putin’s actions like “what Hitler did in the ‘30s.” As a leader of the bumbled ”reset” policy towards Russia, Hillary undoubtedly harbors some animus against Putin and will continue the destabilization project ongoing in Ukraine.

Not content with engaging in debacles in Eastern Europe, she has vocally argued for a more aggressive response to what she called the “rollback of democratic development and economic openness in parts of Latin America.” This indicates her willingness to allow the continuation of CIA sponsored efforts at South American destabilization in the countries of Venezuela, Bolivia, Ecuador, Argentina and Brazil.

So it seems that Hillary is a neocon hawk certainly more hawkish than her husband Bill Clinton was as president, so expect Hillary to be George Bush with a wig on

Maybe on domestic issues will she be more progressive than Bill Clinton. But that’s not saying much of the president, Clinton, who gutted welfare for the poor and brought us NAFTA that is aiding in the destruction of the middle class


The “Giant Sucking Sound”: Clinton Gave US NAFTA and Other Free Trade Sellouts

“There is no success story for workers to be found in North America 20 years after NAFTA,” states AFL-CIO president Richard Trumka. Unlike other failures of his Presidency, Bill Clinton can not run from NAFTA. It was Vice President Al Gore, not a veto-proof Republican congress, who lobbied to remove trade barriers with low-wage Mexico. The record of free trade is clear. Multinational corporations and Wall Street speculators realize incredible profits, wages remain stagnant in the US, poverty persists in the developing world, and the remaining industrial corporations in America and Canada are increasingly owned by Chinese, Indian and other foreign interests.

America’s free trade policy is upside down. Besides Canada, Australia and Korea, most of our “free” trade partners are low-wage sweatshop paradises like Mexico, Chile, Panama, Guatemala, Bahrain and Oman. The US does in fact apply tariffs on most goods and on most nations of origin – rates are set by the US International Trade Commission (USTIC), a quasi-public federal agency.

Here’s were Hillary the so called liberal just like her husband will pretend to be a domestic progressive but will stab the middle class in the back by the horrible trade agreements like NAFTA( THAT Bill Clinton enacted).

Indeed nothing is more vital to the 1 present club of hedonistic fascists than these crooked trade agreements that take middle class jobs from Americans and go down to a country like Mexico and pay slave wage where the same job here use to pay a highly livable wage.

Unfortunately though any thing bad Hillary will do the GOP candidate will triple in harm as did the last GOP scoundrel in office George Bush.


The future I am afraid people looks dim

a reply to: Willtell

First off I despise Hillary Clinton. But I have a question for you on the word neocon.

Buy Putin's actions in Georgia, Chechnya and the Ukraine do you consider him a neocon?

originally posted by: Willtell
A crazy group of GOP right-wing nuts with another sinister Bush candidate leading the way as one choice, versus literally an evil wicked “woman” as another choice…what a bargain!

Why is woman in quotes? You think she's not really a woman?

Besides, the election cycle hasn't even begun. Don't assume she'll get the Democrat's nod.

a reply to: Willtell

Now if we can only convince main street america not to be hoodwinked by "The Hillary Show" on TV.

Besides, the election cycle hasn't even begun. Don't assume she'll get the Democrat's nod.

John Kerry. Keep your eye on him. He is trying so hard to get this deal with Iran by hook or by crook. If he does succeed, he will run, and his record vs. Hillary's will shine in the eyes of their base.

Webster Tarpley???....he's a fear monger of the highest magnitude, just look at the books he publishes....geez, they would make a paranoid paranoid...money...money...money

originally posted by: queenofswords

Besides, the election cycle hasn't even begun. Don't assume she'll get the Democrat's nod.

John Kerry. Keep your eye on him. He is trying so hard to get this deal with Iran by hook or by crook. If he does succeed, he will run, and his record vs. Hillary's will shine in the eyes of their base.

I would vote for Jeb before I vote for Hillary. But I would vote for Kerry in a hot damn minute if he got the Dem nod.

originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: Willtell

Now if we can only convince main street america not to be hoodwinked by "The Hillary Show" on TV.

OMG, they all almost looked orgasmic in anticipation.

I bet they even had a 'thrill' running up their legs.

God help us all.

ETA: I find the 'Scooby Van' to be a fitting title.

originally posted by: ScientificRailgun

originally posted by: queenofswords

Besides, the election cycle hasn't even begun. Don't assume she'll get the Democrat's nod.

John Kerry. Keep your eye on him. He is trying so hard to get this deal with Iran by hook or by crook. If he does succeed, he will run, and his record vs. Hillary's will shine in the eyes of their base.

I would vote for Jeb before I vote for Hillary.

Really?

Between those two id rather stay in Japan and tear my passport up in your place

originally posted by: queenofswords

Besides, the election cycle hasn't even begun. Don't assume she'll get the Democrat's nod.

John Kerry. Keep your eye on him. He is trying so hard to get this deal with Iran by hook or by crook. If he does succeed, he will run, and his record vs. Hillary's will shine in the eyes of their base.

Kerry? Lol, he's been swift boated so he stands no chance. He may move up the ladder though, Senator to Secretary of State to possibly vice presidential candidate. He is perfect POTUS insurance, nobody wants the vp to succeed. Look at Quale, Bush Sr, AL Gore, Cheney, Biden. He fits in with that crowd.

originally posted by: crazyewok

originally posted by: ScientificRailgun

originally posted by: queenofswords

Besides, the election cycle hasn't even begun. Don't assume she'll get the Democrat's nod.

John Kerry. Keep your eye on him. He is trying so hard to get this deal with Iran by hook or by crook. If he does succeed, he will run, and his record vs. Hillary's will shine in the eyes of their base.

I would vote for Jeb before I vote for Hillary.

Really?

Between those two id rather stay in Japan and tear my passport up in your place

LOL Chances are by the time it comes time to vote I'll be a Japanese Citizen, and no longer an American Citizen so it probably won't matter.

The Clintons aren't neocons. Neither is Bush-41.

They're CFR. Asia-centric, not ME-centric.

Kind of a big difference.

Not getting whether some clearly clueless or clearly purposeful people are trying to pin the neoconservative label on her.

Be forewarned that Hilary is playing the 'Pitchforks are Coming" card, to save the zionist technofascistic regime from being called out for what they are. It is the simplest way to save the government from blame which they absolutely deserve and have earned. Just smash open the piggy banks of the evil rich, and maybe use the killer cops to redistribute wealth. Already they are doing this on anyone who has a 'large amount of cash' on them when they hit the amerikan highways. Money is now something that they have a right to search for, inquire about, and confiscate, with zero cause. They are taking it because by simply having money, you are involved in crime. I assume that they do some sort of comparison between how much wealth you have in total versus how much you are 'holding' when busted for having it. In other words, if you are Oprah, you get a pass. If you are Joe Six Pack, you get your ass handed to you. Such iniquities are designed to enflame hatred toward the wealthy. You'd have to be brain dead to not see this.

I saw this coming with the timing of her "Poor Clintons" schtick, which came out on the heels of the Amazon co-founder's extorted "pitchfork" essay, approximately 1 year ago. Sure, sure, Clinton's are just po folk. That's why that looted the furnishings at the White House, right? It all makes sense.

The "pitchforks are Coming" essay is a masterful work of deception designed to gage public sentiment. Public sentiment, on Bolshevism. It is their way out. Make us all happy by stealing the very thing that we are calling evil.
Nevermind the police state. They let you off with your puny pot bust, right? Now they just steal all your property and the arrest stays off your record. Don't believe me? It is happening now. This is pure zionisim, a way to hold onto their war machine and keep it turned against us and everyone who hates them. This is being orchestrated from behind the same curtains whether Democrat or Republican.

a reply to: Willtell

# 415

originally posted by: Benevolent Heretic

originally posted by: Willtell
A crazy group of GOP right-wing nuts with another sinister Bush candidate leading the way as one choice, versus literally an evil wicked “woman” as another choice…what a bargain!

Why is woman in quotes? You think she's not really a woman?

Besides, the election cycle hasn't even begun. Don't assume she'll get the Democrat's nod.

she's america's version of thatcher
whom quite a few feminists of the day claim she wasn't one either

surely Ma'am, you of all people aren't considering voting for this reptilian psychopath?

Why don't you just admit you have no clue what the expression "NeoCon" actually means?

a reply to: DJW001

I was thinking the same thing, also include apparently "woman", "evil" and "wicked".

originally posted by: AdamuBureido

originally posted by: Benevolent Heretic

originally posted by: Willtell
A crazy group of GOP right-wing nuts with another sinister Bush candidate leading the way as one choice, versus literally an evil wicked “woman” as another choice…what a bargain!

Why is woman in quotes? You think she's not really a woman?

Besides, the election cycle hasn't even begun. Don't assume she'll get the Democrat's nod.

she's america's version of thatcher
whom quite a few feminists of the day claim she wasn't one either

surely Ma'am, you of all people aren't considering voting for this reptilian psychopath?

Personally I don't trust a damn word she says. And despite my gender, I won't be voting for her just to make her the first female President. I'd rather vote for a qualified male than an unqualified female.

I too, would vote for a qualified male, rather than elect an unqualified female for the sake of having a female President. But as it happens, Hillary Clinton is infinitely qualified.

a reply to: AdamuBureido

she's america's version of thatcher

In what way is New Deal Progressive/Faux Populist Hillary like welfare slashing free marketeer Thatcher? Make it good, this may be the biggest laugh of the day!

a reply to: ScientificRailgun

that insane cackle
when she was gloating on the news RE having Gaddafi murdered...

it should be used for the ad campaign against her

did you perchance see this
13 Words Journalists Were Told Not to Say About Hillary Gets Exposed on NY & Las Vegas Street Art