It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: buddah6
Looks like a 737NG, so there might be some minor damage to #1 ring cowling, and some minor FOD damage to the blades, but at worst its a minor chip to the blades and a small dent to the cowling. Agreed, no wing damage. They would have been going slow enough that it would have barely hurt anything.
originally posted by: F4guy
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: buddah6
Looks like a 737NG, so there might be some minor damage to #1 ring cowling, and some minor FOD damage to the blades, but at worst its a minor chip to the blades and a small dent to the cowling. Agreed, no wing damage. They would have been going slow enough that it would have barely hurt anything.
It's actually a 737-900 and contrary to earlier reports (and posts) it happened on landing. It exited the runway and not a taxiway. I would suspect dynamic hydroplaning since it was raining at IAH. An aircraft will hydroplane at a speed (in mph) of 6.9 times the square root of the tire pressure (in psi), which is 185 psi for the mains and 165 for the nose. So it can slide at or above 90 mph, which is above the touchdown speed for a 737 at landing weight.
It's actually a 737-900 and contrary to earlier reports (and posts) it happened on landing. It exited the runway and not a taxiway.