$6 Billion Missing From Hillary's State Dept, While $2 Billion Pours Into Clinton Foundation

More dirt from foreign sources.....

Vitter has suggested that Clinton’s deep donor ties to Gilbert Chagoury, a major Lebanese-Nigerian land developer who has given millions to Democratic campaigns, the Clinton library and Clinton Foundation global initiatives, could have accounted for some of Clinton’s reticence in the terror designation.

When Chagoury was added to the no-fly list and pulled off a plane in 2010, it took just a few months to get a waiver and a written apology from the Department of Homeland Security — though he said afterwards that he didn’t approach the Clintons for help.

Add Boko Harem To The List Of Reasons Hillary Hid Her Email

originally posted by: IAMTAT

Exclusive: Despite Hillary Clinton promise, charity did not disclose donors

In response to questions from Reuters, officials at the Clinton Health Access Initiative (CHAI) and the foundation confirmed no complete list of donors to the Clintons' charities has been published since 2010. CHAI was spun off as a separate legal entity that year, but the officials acknowledged it still remains subject to the same disclosure agreement as the foundation.

news.yahoo.com...

Remember [email protected]?
There is a Maura Ann Daley as spokeswoman for the Clinton Health Access Initiative (Clinton Foundation)
Could THIS be Hillary's secret contact at the Clinton Foundation while she was at State?

Maura Ann Daley
Partner Relations

Phone: (617) ***-**** HQ Phone
Email: m***@***.org

Clinton Health Access Initiative
383 Dorchester Ave Suite 400
Boston , Massachusetts 02127
United States

www.zoominfo.com...
Maura Daley pops up as a Clinton Foundation employee in this most recent twist on the Hillary email/Clinton Foundation scandal:

Clinton Foundation health charity reportedly stopped publishing donor lists in 2010

The Clinton Foundation's flagship public health program reportedly stopped publishing lists of its donors for a five-year period beginning in 2010, breaking a disclosure rule agreed to by former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and the Obama administration.

According to Reuters, officials at the Clinton Health Access Initiative (CHAI) admitted that they should have kept up the annual practice of recording and updating the names of hundreds of thousands of donors. CHAI was spun off from the Clinton Foundation in 2010, but the officials said that did not change the disclosure rules it was subject to.

CHAI spokeswoman Maura Daley described the lack of disclosure as "an oversight, which we made up for this year" in an e-mail to Reuters.

Reuters also reported that at least seven foreign governments either began supporting or increased their support for CHAI during Clinton's time as secretary of state. Spokeswoman Daley admitted that at least $340,000 in donations from Switzerland's Agency for Development and Cooperation should have been reviewed by the State Department's ethics office when they were received in 2011 and 2012.

However, the State Department told Reuters it could not find any records of its officials reviewing or approving any new money for the foundation.

www.foxnews.com...

Considering the fact that it now looks like her own party has turned against her and all but her staunch supporters are done making excuses for her... I'd say it looks like Hillary's goose is well and fully cooked.

I always suspected that the Clintons had stepped on too many toes and burned too many bridges to ever get back into the White House.

HAITIAN ACTIVISTS Protest at Hillary Clinton’s Office Over BILLIONS MISSING in Relief Funds (VIDEO)

VIDEO:
www.youtube.com...

‘Where Is The Money?”

Sign reads: Bill Clinton where is the money?

Dozens of Haitian activists protested outside of Hillary Clinton’s office over “Billions Stolen” by the Clinton Foundation in hurricane relief funds.

In November Haitian activists held a protest outside of Bill Clinton’s Harlem office. The activists want Bill Clinton what he has done with the $6 billion collected for Haitian earthquake reconstruction.

The activists also denounced Hillary Clinton’s role as US Secretary of State in the installation of Michel “Sweet Micky” Martelly as a puppet president who has accelerated the US and white power destruction and plunder of Haiti.

The protesters claim the $10 billion that was collected was wildly mismanaged.
The Week reported:

More than $10 billion was donated to rebuild Haiti after Haiti’s 2010 earthquake, some of it to the Clinton Foundation, the charitable organization sponsored by former President Bill Clinton and former secretary of state Hillary Clinton. But protesters at the Foundation’s Harlem offices say the money was wildly mismanaged and did not provide the relief Haitians desperately needed.

megynkelly.us...

well of course, Hillary stole it, to fund her takeover of the world, right?....I mean she is reported to have murdered people, embezzled money, has gay lovers, etc. all covered by those great arbiters of truth, the right-wing media, back in the 2008 election...same thing, different year.

It looks like ATS called this before anyone else -- Hillary Clinton embezzling billions of dollars from the State Department by laundering the money through foreign sources.

This is the 'blockbuster exposé' Rand Paul says will wreck Hillary Clinton's campaign

"Schweizer detailed patterns of official corruption in Washington that led to congressional resignations and new ethics laws. In 'Clinton Cash,' he follows the Clinton money trail, revealing the connection between their personal fortune, their 'close personal friends,' the Clinton Foundation, foreign nations, and some of the highest ranks of government," its Amazon description promises.

a reply to: SkepticOverlord

Nothing personal SO...But this appears to the same old BS.

www.nytimes.com...

“We will see a pattern of financial transactions involving the Clintons that occurred contemporaneous with favorable U.S. policy decisions benefiting those providing the funds,” Mr. Schweizer writes.

OK…Correlation vs. Causation…anyone? Let’s take a look…

His examples include

a free-trade agreement in Colombia that benefited a major foundation donor’s natural resource investments in the South American nation,

Let’s start with the first example offered....Columbian Free Trade deal…

Colombia Free Trade Agreement, it was signed on November 22, 2006, by Deputy U.S. Trade Representative John Veroneau and Colombian Minister of Trade

Hmmm…OK…Hillary was not in office in 2006, what’s up?

The United States Congress then took on the agreement and passed it on October 12, 2011. The agreement went into effect on May 15, 2012.

….OK so maybe She got the Dems in Congress to push it through…Written and signed under Bush, but Congress hadn’t approved yet, so maybe that is where the “corruption” is?

Several Democrats and prominent labor unions, however, oppose the deals, arguing that they could help U.S. companies without bringing much benefit to U.S. workers, particularly if increased imports lead to widespread layoffs.

What?

Actually the Columbian Free Trade Act was written in 2006 by the Bush Admin and signed in 2011 with 231 GOP votes and only 31 Democrats.

Not to mention this is handled by a whole other department than State where Hillary was posted?

So…If this was Hillary’s doing…She must have bought the majority of GOP in Congress? As well as the Bush Administration back in 2006 when the agreement was written?

See…Correlation does not equal Causation…

en.wikipedia.org...

www.washingtonpost.com...

www.govtrack.us...

I have no love for Hillary...but I hate BS and this book looks like it is going to be a laundry list of ...Don't look too closely...Causation vs. Correlation BS.

a reply to: SkepticOverlord

Chew on this, if the Clinton's Fund got 2 billion imagine what the others are walking away with. That is a huge investment and also a huge political risk by the Clinton's using their names on such a fund, probably no criminal risk though.

This Clinton money for power/power for money regime is likely just one branch of a hidden system supported by those that are seeing far greater profit than the Clintons. Them even having a foreign funded war chest that they can borrow against for US political gain should be an instant disqualifier for our elections.

Nothing will probably be done about it even if Hillary gets hit bad in the polls because of it. Just like when all the allies were guilty and up to their necks in corruption and dirty money from the UN oil for food regime imposed on Saddam's Iraq. They had to be dragged away from that feeding trough kicking and screaming but none of the wrongdoing ever had to be answered for.

She wont get the Presidency, but she''ll get to keep the money, and that's what this entire thing is all about

a reply to: Indigo5

If she is the recipient of illegal foreign influence it doesn't matter who or when made it possible, that makes her Constitutionally disqualified. The Clinton Foundation has its own determination to not accept funds that would disqualify themselves from elections. If they took the money it is nobody else fault.

originally posted by: SPECULUM
She wont get the Presidency, but she''ll get to keep the money, and that's what this entire thing is all about

No, more likely whatever gave her those huge funds will want them back if she bungled the handling so badly that they never see a return on their investment.

originally posted by: TinfoilTP
a reply to: Indigo5

If she is the recipient of illegal foreign influence

I haven't seen evidence proving this...at all..

The Clinton Foundation has its own determination to not accept funds that would disqualify themselves from elections. If they took the money it is nobody else fault.

Confusing wording? The Clinton foundation established higher standards than the law required. If they failed to meet those standards is in question, but even if they failed to meet those standards and accepted foreign donations while Hillary was at State, it is not illegal by any definition of current laws.

Again...not defending Hillary, but looking for actual meat (facts, evidence and logic) here and finding constructed BS for a political agenda (election season) instead.

a reply to: SkepticOverlord

You could have pictures of Hillary going over 911 plans with Osama and she'd still get a pass from her supporters.

originally posted by: Indigo5

originally posted by: TinfoilTP
a reply to: Indigo5

If she is the recipient of illegal foreign influence

I haven't seen evidence proving this...at all..

The Clinton Foundation has its own determination to not accept funds that would disqualify themselves from elections. If they took the money it is nobody else fault.

Confusing wording? The Clinton foundation established higher standards than the law required. If they failed to meet those standards is in question, but even if they failed to meet those standards and accepted foreign donations while Hillary was at State, it is not illegal by any definition of current laws.

Again...not defending Hillary, but looking for actual meat (facts, evidence and logic) here and finding constructed BS for a political agenda (election season) instead.

Rand Paul seems to think she is all washed up from this one.

a reply to: SkepticOverlord

From 2009-2012
15% of the $500M raised by the Clinton Foundation...actually went to charity!
25% went to travel expenses, salaries & employee benefits.
60% went to unspecified "OTHER EXPENSES".

Between 2009 and 2012, the Clinton Foundation raised over $500 million dollars according to a review of IRS documents by The Federalist (2012, 2011, 2010, 2009, 2008). A measly 15 percent of that, or $75 million, went towards programmatic grants. More than $25 million went to fund travel expenses. Nearly $110 million went toward employee salaries and benefits. And a whopping $290 million during that period — nearly 60 percent of all money raised — was classified merely as “other expenses.” Official IRS forms do not list cigar or dry-cleaning expenses as a specific line item. The Clinton Foundation may well be saving lives, but it seems odd that the costs of so many life-saving activities would be classified by the organization itself as just random, miscellaneous expenses.

thefederalist.com...

a reply to: IAMTAT

(A) The Clinton Foundations Tax Forms, plus all other financials are posted publicly.
See here..
www.clintonfoundation.org...

(B) Secondly
"Between 2009 and 2012, the Clinton Foundation raised over $500 million dollars according to a review of IRS documents by The Federalist (2012, 2011, 2010, 2009, 2008). A measly 15 percent of that, or $75 million, went towards programmatic grants."

In 2012 alone the Clinton Foundation spent $200,871,074 on Program Services...

Not sure your source is trustworthy in facts or math?

Let me keep looking..

a reply to: queenofswords

I think Valerie got revenge by leaking out the facts on her email.

Members of Bill Clinton’s camp say the former president suspects the White House is the source of the leak and is furious.

‘Obama and Valerie Jarrett will go to any lengths to prevent Hillary from becoming president.’

“My contacts and friends in newspapers and TV tell me that they’ve been contacted by the White House and offered all kinds of negative stories about us,” one of Bill’s friends quotes him as saying. “The Obamas are behind the email story, and they’re spreading rumors that I’ve been with women, that Hillary promoted people at the State Department who’d done favors for our foundation, that John Kerry had to clean up diplomatic messes Hillary left behind.”

*snip*

“Obama and Valerie Jarrett will go to any lengths to prevent Hillary from becoming president,” a source close to the White House told me. “They believe that Hillary, like her husband, is left of center, not a true-blue liberal.”

If she gets into the White House, they believe she will compromise with the Republicans in Congress and undo Obama’s legacy.

“With Obama’s approval,” this source continued, “Valerie has been holding secret meetings with Martin O’Malley [the Democratic former governor of Maryland] and [Massachusetts Sen.] Elizabeth Warren. She’s promised O’Malley and Warren the full support of the White House if they will challenge Hillary for the presidential nomination.”

nypost.com...

They need to have a good 'ole cat fight.